Page 5 of 6 [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

20 Mar 2009, 5:32 am

azulene wrote:
I am a scientist from my first atom to my last, so here is what I think:

Without science and technology humans would not exist.

.


You have it backwards. Without humans, science and technology as they are would not exist. Some of the primates can make very crude tools (which is technology, version 0.1) but not much else.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

20 Mar 2009, 5:35 am

monkees4va wrote:
I am proud that I am not human. I am proud I don't belong to the quivering mess that is humanity.
I socialize with them, but only certain members of the species. Those higher up in the dominance hierarchy (both social and political) generally don't deserve that power.
I am a human-shaped being, one whose existance needs a new genus from homo sapians sapians


I am sure an analysis of your genome by Venter's sequencing process would reveal that you are a member of the species homo sapien sapien. You have cultural differences with the vast majority of the species, as do I. Deny it if you must, but you are one of the Smart Apes in The Monkey House.

ruveyn



Shadowgirl
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 458

20 Mar 2009, 10:50 am

A creation by God.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

20 Mar 2009, 11:23 am

Shadowgirl wrote:
A creation by God.


It's surprisingly difficult to convince naive minds that there is no Santa Claus, no Easter bunny, no fairies, no vampires, etc.



JetLag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2008
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,762
Location: California

20 Mar 2009, 5:15 pm

I believe that humans are a creation by a master scientist named God. One of the reasons that I lost my faith in the fantasy of evolution, and the unquestioning acceptance that I was an apeman, was based on the defunct theory that life started from a "simple cell," which scientist now have discovered to be a very "complex cell." And the immeasurable complexity of matter proves creation by a genius.


_________________
Stung by the splendor of a sudden thought. ~ Robert Browning


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

20 Mar 2009, 5:44 pm

JetLag wrote:
I believe that humans are a creation by a master scientist named God. One of the reasons that I lost my faith in the fantasy of evolution, and the unquestioning acceptance that I was an apeman, was based on the defunct theory that life started from a "simple cell," which scientist now have discovered to be a very "complex cell." And the immeasurable complexity of matter proves creation by a genius.


Humans are the outcome of contingent events. We are the product of genetic variation and natural selection in a world whose physical condition changes over time. There is no Master Scientist or if there is, he left town a long time ago. There is only the Laboratory.

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

20 Mar 2009, 10:33 pm

JetLag wrote:
I believe that humans are a creation by a master scientist named God. One of the reasons that I lost my faith in the fantasy of evolution, and the unquestioning acceptance that I was an apeman, was based on the defunct theory that life started from a "simple cell," which scientist now have discovered to be a very "complex cell." And the immeasurable complexity of matter proves creation by a genius.


Whenever I read statements like this I feel sad.



philosopher
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 103

31 Mar 2009, 7:57 pm

We are human beings not human doings cliche but true.Despite our percieved antagonisism to the world why not embrace the neurotypical illusion but quote them platos anology of the cave.



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

31 Mar 2009, 8:04 pm

half apes / half Et's


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

31 Mar 2009, 10:59 pm

azulene wrote:
Even quantum mechanics tells us objectivity is impossible.

Does it now?


_________________
* here for the nachos.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Mar 2009, 11:39 pm

azulene wrote:

Even quantum mechanics tells us objectivity is impossible. I put an asterix next to the question alluding to the most "scientific" perspective above. The rest was a subjective weave in demonstrating possible emotional coloring on or around the topic of comparing humans to animals :wink: .



Quantum physics tells no such thing. Quantum electrodynamics predicts ensemble behavior to twelve decimal places as verified by tens of thousands of experiments. Is that objective enough for you?

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

01 Apr 2009, 12:48 am

To speak of humans versus animals is like speaking of grasshoppers versus animals or paramecium versus animals. We are all animals.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

01 Apr 2009, 9:23 pm

Actually, I'm pretty sure that paramecia aren't animals.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

01 Apr 2009, 10:42 pm

twoshots wrote:
Actually, I'm pretty sure that paramecia aren't animals.


Then it's about time you changed your mind.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

01 Apr 2009, 10:51 pm

Sand wrote:
twoshots wrote:
Actually, I'm pretty sure that paramecia aren't animals.


Then it's about time you changed your mind.

A paramecium is no more an animal than a tree or a piece of kelp is.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

01 Apr 2009, 10:54 pm

twoshots wrote:
Sand wrote:
twoshots wrote:
Actually, I'm pretty sure that paramecia aren't animals.


Then it's about time you changed your mind.

A paramecium is no more an animal than a tree or a piece of kelp is.


See http://101science.com/paramecium.htm