Page 43 of 82 [ 1307 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 ... 82  Next

WAautisticguy
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 280

02 Mar 2016, 10:43 pm

I watched a lot of the Super Tuesday coverage. Was I surprised? Not really. I knew voters would go straight for Trump in those seven states. Cruz would win TX (and he also won Oklahoma), and I'm glad Rubio finally got a state.
Dr. Ben Carson seems to be ending his run for President: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/03/us/po ... .html?_r=0
He was last place in practically every state last night.

Still not a fan of Trump. Sure, I'm moderate. But anyone, even Hillary, is better than him. I don't need a wall over Mexico, Muslims deported, and a dictatorship. But I do agree that more troops should be sent gradually to go fight ISIS. Who knows, the mainstream media doesn't tell us, but we don't know if they are planning another attack on America as we speak. Those poor refugees - and I mean the non-terrorist/extremists. Too many are dying, and many of them are children.
Women's rights, the poor, and changing the education standards should be on the docket as well. WAY too many people in or below poverty in America. Come on, this isn't Africa. More jobs to help the poor; provide them assistance; and get rid of the so called Common Core.
And don't open the race card. We are the land of the free - and the home of the brave. Not the "land of only white." Land of the FREE, meaning we are melting pot of immigrants and interesting cultures.

- I am expressing my own opinions, as a moderate. Not a strict liberal, not a strict conservative.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

02 Mar 2016, 10:56 pm

Trump pushes out wild claims as if they were facts, and his supporters spread it like fundamentalist believers of the gospel. If he is doing this deliberately, he is contemptuous of facts, uses lies to manipulate and deceive. If he is doing this unknowingly, then he is ignorant of the facts and doesn't bother with fact checking. Example - try fact checking it:

From Fact Checks:


Donald J. Trump
Eighth Republican Debate
Feb. 6, 2016
"Right now, we're the highest-taxed country in the world."

Not even close.

By several measures, Mr. Trump’s claim about the country’s taxes does not check out.

The United States’ total tax revenue as a share of gross domestic product ranked toward the bottom of the pack among the countries that are members in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

In 2014, according to O.E.C.D. data, the United States’ tax revenue represented 26 percent of gross domestic product. The organization's average was about 34 percent, and the country with the largest share was Denmark, at 51 percent.

The United States was in the middle of the pack for total taxes per capita, according to O.E.C.D. data.

And if you judge by which country has the highest top personal income tax rate, the United States is not close to the highest, either.

— Thomas Kaplan

See: http://ceoworld.biz/2015/10/20/top-25-c ... world-2015



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

02 Mar 2016, 11:35 pm

Trump is talking corporate income taxes which are the highest in the world



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

03 Mar 2016, 12:18 am

A nil rate of tax for not a few corporations in actuality:

http://moneymorning.com/2015/05/21/char ... -no-taxes/



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,710
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

03 Mar 2016, 12:35 am

B19 wrote:
A nil rate of tax for not a few corporations in actuality:

http://moneymorning.com/2015/05/21/char ... -no-taxes/


Thank you! Too many of those bastards are slipping out of paying their taxes, all the while complaining about their tax burden!


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

03 Mar 2016, 12:48 am

B19 wrote:
A nil rate of tax for not a few corporations in actuality:

http://moneymorning.com/2015/05/21/char ... -no-taxes/


That's kind of the whole point of what Trump is saying, the reason these companies don't pay any taxes is because they are keeping their profits outside of the country because of how high the corporate tax rate is. There are also a lot of deductions as well. Trump wants to lower the corporate tax rate while eliminating loophole/deductables and have a one time repatriation tax at 10% to bring back some of the $2 trillion dollars of profit stashed outside the country.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

03 Mar 2016, 1:05 am

care2 is hardly neutral

may as well link the DailyKos or MotherJones



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,710
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

03 Mar 2016, 1:53 am

Jacoby wrote:
care2 is hardly neutral

may as well link the DailyKos or MotherJones


Regardless, does that mean it's wrong?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

03 Mar 2016, 10:26 am

:!:

Jacoby wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
If he had considerable diplomatic skills, the English Parliament would not have considered banning him from entering the UK.

He is seen, by many people, as a person with little class, a hair-trigger temper, and just somebody with whom they don't want to associate.

His election would bring the US down a few notches when it comes time to bargain with the world.


Who cares who the parliament of the UK wants as our president? Their whole ban threat was a total joke especially considering how many of their own citizens are being radicalized and fighting for ISIS. The UK has a serious security problem, I don't want that same problem and maybe that's not politically correct for somebody in the UK to say but tell me how it has been a net positive in any way?

The UK has it's own Donald Trump, look up Boris Johnson who may condemn Trump for his criticisms of his country but is the same bombast that he is with the hair to boot. He is leading the UK campaign to leave the European Union right now, perhaps one day the UK can graduate from being a protectorate, if they do he will more than likely be the next Prime Minister. They can't judge us at all and besides, they do not act independently of the US so its is pointless. Everybody will fall in line when they need to fall in line. There are going to be some big changes in Europe by 2020, trust me.

We don't need to negotiate peace between the US and Europe, we need someone that can bridge the divide between the US and our "enemies" and Trump is the only person in either party that will make that happen with Russia which is the important bilateral relationship in the world even 2016. All these other countries have leaders just like Trump, they have policies just like Trump, do you think the Japanese or South Koreans would allow their manufacturing base to be stolen away? Hell no.

Interesting how you ignore the point and reply about something never claimed. The issue was diplomatic skills. He failed to use any diplomatic skills with the UK government. The claim has nothing to do with who the UK wants elected as our President....



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

03 Mar 2016, 10:29 am

Donald Trump's campaign is based on his attitude, and not his (lack of) aptitude for the job.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

03 Mar 2016, 12:26 pm

pcuser wrote:
:!:
Jacoby wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
If he had considerable diplomatic skills, the English Parliament would not have considered banning him from entering the UK.

He is seen, by many people, as a person with little class, a hair-trigger temper, and just somebody with whom they don't want to associate.

His election would bring the US down a few notches when it comes time to bargain with the world.


Who cares who the parliament of the UK wants as our president? Their whole ban threat was a total joke especially considering how many of their own citizens are being radicalized and fighting for ISIS. The UK has a serious security problem, I don't want that same problem and maybe that's not politically correct for somebody in the UK to say but tell me how it has been a net positive in any way?

The UK has it's own Donald Trump, look up Boris Johnson who may condemn Trump for his criticisms of his country but is the same bombast that he is with the hair to boot. He is leading the UK campaign to leave the European Union right now, perhaps one day the UK can graduate from being a protectorate, if they do he will more than likely be the next Prime Minister. They can't judge us at all and besides, they do not act independently of the US so its is pointless. Everybody will fall in line when they need to fall in line. There are going to be some big changes in Europe by 2020, trust me.

We don't need to negotiate peace between the US and Europe, we need someone that can bridge the divide between the US and our "enemies" and Trump is the only person in either party that will make that happen with Russia which is the important bilateral relationship in the world even 2016. All these other countries have leaders just like Trump, they have policies just like Trump, do you think the Japanese or South Koreans would allow their manufacturing base to be stolen away? Hell no.

Interesting how you ignore the point and reply about something never claimed. The issue was diplomatic skills. He failed to use any diplomatic skills with the UK government. The claim has nothing to do with who the UK wants elected as our President....


What? Trump is not president yet, the UK parliament did jack squat, it was just a bunch of hot air from place that is completely ruled by political correctness. They have to condemn Trump or else they quite literally might have violence on their streets, they protest when a cartoon gets drawn so I understand their fear but privately I'm sure the opinions of the leaders over there are all quite different. It would be amusing if any Brits actually think we take that seriously. Trump is pretty much the American incarnation of the populist European right that has gained so much influence these last decade or so, it's not going away any time soon and there will countries in Europe that elected similar leaders in the coming years. Like I said, we don't need diplomacy with our protectorates but rather with our so called enemies who respect and understand strength and Trump doesn't adhere to this bizarre idea that not speaking with them somehow deprives them of legitimacy when the reality is that is just an excuse to not change our course as far as foreign policy goes which is making a lot of people in this country very very rich.

Hillary has zero diplomatic skill and she is a neocon to boot, she's the worst possible person besides maybe Marco Rubio in this regard but even a return to the Bush era diplomacy would be an improvement over the disaster Obama has presided over. He supposedly going to fix our image in the world and usher in this era of good feelings, it hasn't happened and he'll leave the world a much more dangerous place than when he found it.



pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

03 Mar 2016, 12:33 pm

Jacoby wrote:
pcuser wrote:
:!:
Jacoby wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
If he had considerable diplomatic skills, the English Parliament would not have considered banning him from entering the UK.

He is seen, by many people, as a person with little class, a hair-trigger temper, and just somebody with whom they don't want to associate.

His election would bring the US down a few notches when it comes time to bargain with the world.


Who cares who the parliament of the UK wants as our president? Their whole ban threat was a total joke especially considering how many of their own citizens are being radicalized and fighting for ISIS. The UK has a serious security problem, I don't want that same problem and maybe that's not politically correct for somebody in the UK to say but tell me how it has been a net positive in any way?

The UK has it's own Donald Trump, look up Boris Johnson who may condemn Trump for his criticisms of his country but is the same bombast that he is with the hair to boot. He is leading the UK campaign to leave the European Union right now, perhaps one day the UK can graduate from being a protectorate, if they do he will more than likely be the next Prime Minister. They can't judge us at all and besides, they do not act independently of the US so its is pointless. Everybody will fall in line when they need to fall in line. There are going to be some big changes in Europe by 2020, trust me.

We don't need to negotiate peace between the US and Europe, we need someone that can bridge the divide between the US and our "enemies" and Trump is the only person in either party that will make that happen with Russia which is the important bilateral relationship in the world even 2016. All these other countries have leaders just like Trump, they have policies just like Trump, do you think the Japanese or South Koreans would allow their manufacturing base to be stolen away? Hell no.

Interesting how you ignore the point and reply about something never claimed. The issue was diplomatic skills. He failed to use any diplomatic skills with the UK government. The claim has nothing to do with who the UK wants elected as our President....


What? Trump is not president yet, the UK parliament did jack squat, it was just a bunch of hot air from place that is completely ruled by political correctness. They have to condemn Trump or else they quite literally might have violence on their streets, they protest when a cartoon gets drawn so I understand their fear but privately I'm sure the opinions of the leaders over there are all quite different. It would be amusing if any Brits actually think we take that seriously. Trump is pretty much the American incarnation of the populist European right that has gained so much influence these last decade or so, it's not going away any time soon and there will countries in Europe that elected similar leaders in the coming years. Like I said, we don't need diplomacy with our protectorates but rather with our so called enemies who respect and understand strength and Trump doesn't adhere to this bizarre idea that not speaking with them somehow deprives them of legitimacy when the reality is that is just an excuse to not change our course as far as foreign policy goes which is making a lot of people in this country very very rich.

Hillary has zero diplomatic skill and she is a neocon to boot, she's the worst possible person besides maybe Marco Rubio in this regard but even a return to the Bush era diplomacy would be an improvement over the disaster Obama has presided over. He supposedly going to fix our image in the world and usher in this era of good feelings, it hasn't happened and he'll leave the world a much more dangerous place than when he found it.

Are you on drugs???



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

03 Mar 2016, 12:46 pm

pcuser wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
pcuser wrote:
:!:
Jacoby wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
If he had considerable diplomatic skills, the English Parliament would not have considered banning him from entering the UK.

He is seen, by many people, as a person with little class, a hair-trigger temper, and just somebody with whom they don't want to associate.

His election would bring the US down a few notches when it comes time to bargain with the world.


Who cares who the parliament of the UK wants as our president? Their whole ban threat was a total joke especially considering how many of their own citizens are being radicalized and fighting for ISIS. The UK has a serious security problem, I don't want that same problem and maybe that's not politically correct for somebody in the UK to say but tell me how it has been a net positive in any way?

The UK has it's own Donald Trump, look up Boris Johnson who may condemn Trump for his criticisms of his country but is the same bombast that he is with the hair to boot. He is leading the UK campaign to leave the European Union right now, perhaps one day the UK can graduate from being a protectorate, if they do he will more than likely be the next Prime Minister. They can't judge us at all and besides, they do not act independently of the US so its is pointless. Everybody will fall in line when they need to fall in line. There are going to be some big changes in Europe by 2020, trust me.

We don't need to negotiate peace between the US and Europe, we need someone that can bridge the divide between the US and our "enemies" and Trump is the only person in either party that will make that happen with Russia which is the important bilateral relationship in the world even 2016. All these other countries have leaders just like Trump, they have policies just like Trump, do you think the Japanese or South Koreans would allow their manufacturing base to be stolen away? Hell no.

Interesting how you ignore the point and reply about something never claimed. The issue was diplomatic skills. He failed to use any diplomatic skills with the UK government. The claim has nothing to do with who the UK wants elected as our President....


What? Trump is not president yet, the UK parliament did jack squat, it was just a bunch of hot air from place that is completely ruled by political correctness. They have to condemn Trump or else they quite literally might have violence on their streets, they protest when a cartoon gets drawn so I understand their fear but privately I'm sure the opinions of the leaders over there are all quite different. It would be amusing if any Brits actually think we take that seriously. Trump is pretty much the American incarnation of the populist European right that has gained so much influence these last decade or so, it's not going away any time soon and there will countries in Europe that elected similar leaders in the coming years. Like I said, we don't need diplomacy with our protectorates but rather with our so called enemies who respect and understand strength and Trump doesn't adhere to this bizarre idea that not speaking with them somehow deprives them of legitimacy when the reality is that is just an excuse to not change our course as far as foreign policy goes which is making a lot of people in this country very very rich.

Hillary has zero diplomatic skill and she is a neocon to boot, she's the worst possible person besides maybe Marco Rubio in this regard but even a return to the Bush era diplomacy would be an improvement over the disaster Obama has presided over. He supposedly going to fix our image in the world and usher in this era of good feelings, it hasn't happened and he'll leave the world a much more dangerous place than when he found it.

Are you on drugs???


do you have an argument? are you on drugs?



pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

03 Mar 2016, 2:03 pm

Jacoby wrote:
pcuser wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
pcuser wrote:
:!:
Jacoby wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
If he had considerable diplomatic skills, the English Parliament would not have considered banning him from entering the UK.

He is seen, by many people, as a person with little class, a hair-trigger temper, and just somebody with whom they don't want to associate.

His election would bring the US down a few notches when it comes time to bargain with the world.


Who cares who the parliament of the UK wants as our president? Their whole ban threat was a total joke especially considering how many of their own citizens are being radicalized and fighting for ISIS. The UK has a serious security problem, I don't want that same problem and maybe that's not politically correct for somebody in the UK to say but tell me how it has been a net positive in any way?

The UK has it's own Donald Trump, look up Boris Johnson who may condemn Trump for his criticisms of his country but is the same bombast that he is with the hair to boot. He is leading the UK campaign to leave the European Union right now, perhaps one day the UK can graduate from being a protectorate, if they do he will more than likely be the next Prime Minister. They can't judge us at all and besides, they do not act independently of the US so its is pointless. Everybody will fall in line when they need to fall in line. There are going to be some big changes in Europe by 2020, trust me.

We don't need to negotiate peace between the US and Europe, we need someone that can bridge the divide between the US and our "enemies" and Trump is the only person in either party that will make that happen with Russia which is the important bilateral relationship in the world even 2016. All these other countries have leaders just like Trump, they have policies just like Trump, do you think the Japanese or South Koreans would allow their manufacturing base to be stolen away? Hell no.

Interesting how you ignore the point and reply about something never claimed. The issue was diplomatic skills. He failed to use any diplomatic skills with the UK government. The claim has nothing to do with who the UK wants elected as our President....


What? Trump is not president yet, the UK parliament did jack squat, it was just a bunch of hot air from place that is completely ruled by political correctness. They have to condemn Trump or else they quite literally might have violence on their streets, they protest when a cartoon gets drawn so I understand their fear but privately I'm sure the opinions of the leaders over there are all quite different. It would be amusing if any Brits actually think we take that seriously. Trump is pretty much the American incarnation of the populist European right that has gained so much influence these last decade or so, it's not going away any time soon and there will countries in Europe that elected similar leaders in the coming years. Like I said, we don't need diplomacy with our protectorates but rather with our so called enemies who respect and understand strength and Trump doesn't adhere to this bizarre idea that not speaking with them somehow deprives them of legitimacy when the reality is that is just an excuse to not change our course as far as foreign policy goes which is making a lot of people in this country very very rich.

Hillary has zero diplomatic skill and she is a neocon to boot, she's the worst possible person besides maybe Marco Rubio in this regard but even a return to the Bush era diplomacy would be an improvement over the disaster Obama has presided over. He supposedly going to fix our image in the world and usher in this era of good feelings, it hasn't happened and he'll leave the world a much more dangerous place than when he found it.

Are you on drugs???


do you have an argument? are you on drugs?

I'm not on drugs and I have valid arguments. Unfortunately, you have such deep flaws in your arguments it would take too much time to bring you up to speed to even understand what's wrong with what you're claiming...
[personal attacks are prohibited on WrongPlanet]



Last edited by Adamantium on 03 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.: Personal attack

Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

05 Mar 2016, 4:17 am

Jacoby wrote:
AspE wrote:
Jacoby, you sound just like David Duke:

"...The top seven Super PACs of Hillary Clinton are all Jewish Zionists. No wonder she’s always supported these insane wars for Israel in the Middle East orchestrated by neocons for the interests of Israel rather than America. We have the same thing going on with the Republican Party today. The only person who has stepped out of that agenda has been Donald Trump..."


While it is interesting that you do so much research on David Duke, a broken clock is right twice a day. It's like saying because Hitler liked dogs so all dogs are bad, it's just stupid mind manipulation.


Duke supporting Trump.

This comes from a Duke statement that what he has been saying for decades, and the majority of Americans support, is that the Government has to enforce laws equally, and cannot pick and chose to not enforce immigration law without undermining all laws.

Illegal immigration has polled high for the last twenty-five years in what Americans are concerned about.

On that single issue, Trump is the first national figure to agree with the American Public.

Duke never endorsed Trump, he only mentioned that one of Duke's causes had been brought to the national stage.

The Media however, ran a story that they were dating.

You have to support illegal immigration, because David Duke wrote that the Immigration Laws should be enforced.

This proves Trump is a NAZI!

Low energy JEB spent $100 Million, more than a Billion will be spent between now and the election on Lies, Social Media, and Slander.

The Alien Grays and the Tall Whites do endorse Trump, as the only defense against Hillary the Reptilian.

This election is important, the Time Travelers say this is the choice between our joining the Federation of Solar Systems, or Reptilians openly feeding on the surface. Reptilians are not, just like us with green scales. It is not Racist to not want to be eaten.

The choice is, vote for the future, or vote for the past.