ruveyn wrote:
Why is there such an antipathy toward international commerce?
And what is wrong with cheap labor? Labor is a commodity, bought and sold in the market place. The people who moan and groan about how we are "exploiting" cheap labor will by their meat or gasoline at the lowest available price quality being the same.
There is nothing wrong with international commerce, but it is a simple fact that, for a variety of reasons, the costs of living in one nation is not equal to that of other nations. Tariffs were used to hinder trade so that domestic production of goods could not be undercut by foreign made goods purely because of price of production.
With trade tariffs, if you wanted to buy something that was made cheaper in India, the tariffs brought the price of that good in the US up to what a domestic made good cost. You based your purchase decision on the QUALITY of the good. This maintained the healthy competition of the marketplace because the better made product would outsell the other. When this was eliminated, cheap-made goods easily sold more because it was cheaper to replace a cheap good than it was to repair it.
As cheap goods displaced domestic-made goods, people lost jobs, incomes dropped, dependence on cheap goods increased.
Now, the USA has almost no manufacturing base, and the economy reflects that problem.