PunkyKat wrote:
People have been murdering each other since the dawn of time, abortion is murder.
The legal concept of murder pre-dates human rights by thousands of years. The original reason for punitive measures against killing people is because it denies society a productive member.
I certainly cant deny that a foetus has productive potential, but there is a statistical difference between that and a skilled adult whose society already depends on him and who has emotional bonds with other members of society.
This is still true today. Doctors will save a mother over her unborn child.
Summing up, a doctor who does that will not be charged with murder, which is solely a legal concept. Even though he killed a baby. Catch-22, right?
Of course. But thats not what we are talking about is it? We are talking about the killing of the foetus that inconveniences the mother. No danger to her before hand.
But she'll never get charged with murder in this case either. Do you know why? Because no one can ever determine motive. And no elected judge will ever will take actions that revoke any human rights from 50% of the population. He would have to be insane. Another catch-22. Societies rights are embodied by the mother, and the majority wins over a baby.
And if you wont charge a wilful mother, how can you charge the doctor without being a hypocrite?
_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.