Greshym_Shorkan wrote:
I never said it was a given, just a possibility.
Don't you see? If you make an observation, then make a prediction based on that observation, in the world of science you're allowed to call people on their bulls**t or prove them right. Example: you notice that when you let go of a ball on planet Earth, it falls to the surface at 9.8 m/s^2. You decide to tell others that this is the case, and that if they drop something, it will fall at the same rate. Others are now able to test it for themselves, to see if your idea is any good. You can't do that with something that is 'supernatural'. This is not an opinion, it is part of the definition of 'supernatural'.
Let me again try to get my point across: you say there is a
possibility of something supernatural existing. By thinking this, you accept that there
may be things which no other human can understand, but that happen regardless. And that's the problem: in even accepting the possibility that stuff happens that can't be proved by people, you're essentially being a child with fingers in his ears going 'LA LA LA LA LA LA I can't hear you!! !'.
This is also known by such fascinating terms as: ignorance, psychosis, dogma, faith, belief, 'I've-just-got-a-feelin', and 'f**ck you, I'm right'. Whether you go the whole way or just accept the
possibility of supernatural phenomena, you're being just as ignorant.
Although, you know what they say: ignorance
is bliss.
. I said I believe in the possibility. I can't make any simpler. That doesn't make me right, or you wrong, but you're obviously not capable of comprehending that. And you obviously just wanna argue but you can't reason worth ****. And no I don't owe anybody proof, seeing as I already admitted it might not exist.