Page 6 of 7 [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Sep 2011, 5:21 pm

Joker wrote:
North Korea is a Juche unitary single-party state.

1. According to Kim Il-sung, the Juche Idea is based on the belief that "man is the master of everything and decides everything."

2. A unitary state is a state governed as one single unit in which the central government is supreme and any administrative divisions (subnational units) exercise only powers that their central government chooses to delegate. Many states in the world have a unitary system of government.

3. Single-party state is a type of party system government in which a single political party forms the government and no other parties are permitted to run candidates for election. Sometimes the term de facto single-party state is used to describe a dominant-party system where laws or practices prevent the opposition from legally getting power.


And you can tell just how successful N.K. is. The only people getting enough to eat in N.K. are the men in the army.

ruveyn



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

14 Sep 2011, 5:40 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Joker wrote:
North Korea is a Juche unitary single-party state.

1. According to Kim Il-sung, the Juche Idea is based on the belief that "man is the master of everything and decides everything."

2. A unitary state is a state governed as one single unit in which the central government is supreme and any administrative divisions (subnational units) exercise only powers that their central government chooses to delegate. Many states in the world have a unitary system of government.

3. Single-party state is a type of party system government in which a single political party forms the government and no other parties are permitted to run candidates for election. Sometimes the term de facto single-party state is used to describe a dominant-party system where laws or practices prevent the opposition from legally getting power.


And you can tell just how successful N.K. is. The only people getting enough to eat in N.K. are the men in the army.

ruveyn


I would'nt like to live in a country, like that where only the men, in the army, are taken care of.
Another good example would be Nazi Germany, and the Soviet Union, people in China, are better taken care of the in N.K.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Sep 2011, 6:04 pm

Joker wrote:

I would'nt like to live in a country, like that where only the men, in the army, are taken care of.
Another good example would be Nazi Germany, and the Soviet Union, people in China, are better taken care of the in N.K.


Look at this: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... k-dark.htm

This tells the entire story of N.K.

ruveyn



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

14 Sep 2011, 6:22 pm

North Korea is a very dark place indeed



ROIH
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 23

17 Sep 2011, 9:47 am

http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2011/201109/news16/20110916-01ee.html

Kim Il Sung's Work Posted on Internet of Regional Organization

Pyongyang, September 16 (KCNA) -- The International Alliance of Societies for the Study of the Juche Idea and Songun Policy in East European and Central Asian Regions on Sept. 9 posted on its Internet homepage President Kim Il Sung's work "Political Programme of the Government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea".

The work, published on Sept. 10, Juche 37 (1948), clarifies the tasks for the reunification of the country and the building of a rich and powerful state, democratic and independent.

Also posted on the homepage was a photo of Kim Il Sung publishing the political programme of the DPRK government at the First Session of the Supreme People's Assembly.

What other country would get so excited about an internet posting?



ROIH
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 23

21 Sep 2011, 8:46 am

Something a bit lighter

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJNBfBr-OGU[/youtube]



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,743
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 Sep 2011, 10:06 am

ROIH wrote:
Something a bit lighter

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJNBfBr-OGU[/youtube]


Well, if North Korea has a single commodity, it's some really hot chicks - though that's countered with even more sour faced old people.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

21 Sep 2011, 11:21 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Some people think that North Korea is a Marxist dictatorship. Originally North Korea mentioned Karl Marx in it's constitution but it now has no mention of Karl Marx or Marxism in its constitution. If your country has no mention of Karl Marx or Marxism in its constitution then it isn't Marxist says I.

Some people think that North Korea is left-wing but North Korea promotes racism and tells its citizens to prepare for war. If your country is racist and obsessed with war then it isn't left-wing says I.



Yet another manifestation of the "No True Scotsman ..." fallacy.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

ruveyn


Back to topic, North Korea is the result of the Far Left style of governing.

Liberals push for Government to control everything, that businesses and rich people are evil personified, etc.

That kinda fits North Korea's governing style.


The right taken to extremes will result in something as equally ugly. What do you think you'd get if you make the poor and social programs the personification of evil? And as a matter of fact, with the right calling the current culture war a fight between "the producers and the moochers," and basing social policy on that notion, we're halfway there already.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Could it be that your idea of "poor and social programs" and our idea of them is different.
We'd rather offer help in the form of employment and/or job training while the left's idea is perpetual welfare even to those able to work.
I guess I see the benefit of more people on the dole, though. The more of them there are the more democratic votes.
Kinda makes sense if you look at it that way. :roll:
Since in North Korea, being a communist country, the government is the controller and provider it looks like we’re back to it being leftist…..



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,743
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 Sep 2011, 11:53 am

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Some people think that North Korea is a Marxist dictatorship. Originally North Korea mentioned Karl Marx in it's constitution but it now has no mention of Karl Marx or Marxism in its constitution. If your country has no mention of Karl Marx or Marxism in its constitution then it isn't Marxist says I.

Some people think that North Korea is left-wing but North Korea promotes racism and tells its citizens to prepare for war. If your country is racist and obsessed with war then it isn't left-wing says I.



Yet another manifestation of the "No True Scotsman ..." fallacy.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

ruveyn


Back to topic, North Korea is the result of the Far Left style of governing.

Liberals push for Government to control everything, that businesses and rich people are evil personified, etc.

That kinda fits North Korea's governing style.


The right taken to extremes will result in something as equally ugly. What do you think you'd get if you make the poor and social programs the personification of evil? And as a matter of fact, with the right calling the current culture war a fight between "the producers and the moochers," and basing social policy on that notion, we're halfway there already.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Could it be that your idea of "poor and social programs" and our idea of them is different.
We'd rather offer help in the form of employment and/or job training while the left's idea is perpetual welfare even to those able to work.
I guess I see the benefit of more people on the dole, though. The more of them there are the more democratic votes.
Kinda makes sense if you look at it that way. :roll:
Since in North Korea, being a communist country, the government is the controller and provider it looks like we’re back to it being leftist…..


That job training is among the programs the right wants to cut.
And where are the jobs that are supposed to liberate poor Americans? Oh, yeah, they're being sent over to China and India by politically conservative businessmen.
And name one instance where the left in this country has control over poor people.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

21 Sep 2011, 5:30 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

Quote:
That job training is among the programs the right wants to cut.


I’d be for it as long as it has real value and isn’t some pork barrel project disguised as something else.
How does that proverb go, “Give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach him to fish and feed him for a lifetime”?

Quote:
And where are the jobs that are supposed to liberate poor Americans? Oh, yeah, they're being sent over to China and India by politically conservative businessmen.


How 'bout with the help of your union buddies wanting more to do less? I’ve seen their handiwork myself.
That and draconian environmental law.

Quote:
And name one instance where the left in this country has control over poor people.


Control through fear.
Control through welfare.
Control through leftist public education
Control through racism (yes RACISM).
They all tie in together to effect control.
If I have to come back and explain each one you won’t like how I do it.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,743
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 Sep 2011, 6:48 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Quote:
That job training is among the programs the right wants to cut.


I’d be for it as long as it has real value and isn’t some pork barrel project disguised as something else.
How does that proverb go, “Give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach him to fish and feed him for a lifetime”?

Quote:
And where are the jobs that are supposed to liberate poor Americans? Oh, yeah, they're being sent over to China and India by politically conservative businessmen.


How 'bout with the help of your union buddies wanting more to do less? I’ve seen their handiwork myself.
That and draconian environmental law.

Quote:
And name one instance where the left in this country has control over poor people.


Control through fear.
Control through welfare.
Control through leftist public education
Control through racism (yes RACISM).
They all tie in together to effect control.
If I have to come back and explain each one you won’t like how I do it.


How about my Union buddies wanting to be able to live the American dream, with proper wages and benefits?
Draconian environmental laws? Well, I guess I'm just a p**** who needs to breath clean air and drink clean water in order to live. Plus, I'd like to have forests and animal life left over for my little daughter to enjoy.
And when have poor people in this country have ever been controlled by fear by liberals? If anything, it's fear of conservatives cutting benefits that poor people have.
Control through welfare? Really? It's a known fact that many of the most conservative people can be the poorest.
Control through leftist public education? You righties really are going over the deep end with your fear of free eduction for everyone.
Racism? When have the people behind civil rights (liberals) resorted to oppressing anyone on racial grounds? Unless your one of those nuts who think whites are being discriminated against because others are given rights.
Now, lets here your counter rant..., er, I mean argument.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Abgal64
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

21 Sep 2011, 7:01 pm

Raptor wrote:
How 'bout with the help of your union buddies wanting more to do less? I’ve seen their handiwork myself.
That and draconian environmental law.
I do like unions any more than any other interest group as they are just helping their friends at the expense of the rest of society, just like I have issues with fossil fuel lobbies and "think-tanks" that function as a cover for special interests.

Raptor wrote:
Control through fear.

Please explain; I do not know of any significant leftist fear-mongering campaign that has established large-scale control of any major aspect of US society.
Raptor wrote:
Control through welfare.
Then why are countries like Germany, New Zealand, France and Finland, which are all welfare states, doing so much better economically, in terms of education and in voter turnout?
Raptor wrote:
Control through leftist public education

Really, is that the biggest problem facing American public education today, "leftism?" I am just out of high school, from both Washington state and California, and, as a self-described progressive, I see the American School System as "leftist" so much as just bad: We reused textbooks from years ago, we had no instructional control in most of our classes, my second school was ran like a prison (a closed campus.) Let us leave aside political aspects, but American schools are horrid by any reasonable standards.
Raptor wrote:
Control through racism (yes RACISM).
They all tie in together to effect control.
If I have to come back and explain each one you won’t like how I do it.

Please do explain each of these propositions that the American left is controlling the USA; I just do not see it.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

21 Sep 2011, 7:11 pm

Quote:
How about my Union buddies wanting to be able to live the American dream, with proper wages and benefits?


Do you have any idea how hard it is to get rid of some slacker under union protection? I’ve seen a union employee tell his manager (more like scream) to shove a good paying job up his ass then walk out only to have the union sue to take him back EVEN THOUGH HE QUIT. I could go on and on about this. Shall I?

Quote:
Draconian environmental laws? Well, I guess I'm just a p**** who needs to breath clean air and drink clean water in order to live. Plus, I'd like to have forests and animal life left over for my little daughter to enjoy.


Right now what we need are jobs. In this century we can compromise and have some of both but we will never be “green” and prosperous at the same time.

Quote:
And when have poor people in this country have ever been controlled by fear by liberals? If anything, it's fear of conservatives cutting benefits that poor people have.


Quote:
Control through welfare? Really? It's a known fact that many of the most conservative people can be the poorest.


The poor can be principled, too.

Quote:
Control through leftist public education? You righties really are going over the deep end with your fear of free eduction for everyone.


Less social s**t and more science, math, and history. REAL history, not that revisionist feel good BS. We need technology and industry, not a big commune of false love and diversity.

Quote:
Racism? When have the people behind civil rights (liberals) resorted to oppressing anyone on racial grounds? Unless your one of those nuts who think whites are being discriminated against because others are given rights.


Welfare IS suppression. See my post on the other thread. Same goes for the other question about them a few histerical questions up...

Quote:
Now, lets here your counter rant..., er, I mean argument.


Happy now? :P



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,743
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 Sep 2011, 7:30 pm

Raptor wrote:
Quote:
How about my Union buddies wanting to be able to live the American dream, with proper wages and benefits?


Do you have any idea how hard it is to get rid of some slacker under union protection? I’ve seen a union employee tell his manager (more like scream) to shove a good paying job up his ass then walk out only to have the union sue to take him back EVEN THOUGH HE QUIT. I could go on and on about this. Shall I?

Quote:
Draconian environmental laws? Well, I guess I'm just a p**** who needs to breath clean air and drink clean water in order to live. Plus, I'd like to have forests and animal life left over for my little daughter to enjoy.


Right now what we need are jobs. In this century we can compromise and have some of both but we will never be “green” and prosperous at the same time.

Quote:
And when have poor people in this country have ever been controlled by fear by liberals? If anything, it's fear of conservatives cutting benefits that poor people have.


Quote:
Control through welfare? Really? It's a known fact that many of the most conservative people can be the poorest.


The poor can be principled, too.

Quote:
Control through leftist public education? You righties really are going over the deep end with your fear of free eduction for everyone.


Less social sh** and more science, math, and history. REAL history, not that revisionist feel good BS. We need technology and industry, not a big commune of false love and diversity.

Quote:
Racism? When have the people behind civil rights (liberals) resorted to oppressing anyone on racial grounds? Unless your one of those nuts who think whites are being discriminated against because others are given rights.


Welfare IS suppression. See my post on the other thread. Same goes for the other question about them a few histerical questions up...

Quote:
Now, lets here your counter rant..., er, I mean argument.


Happy now? :P


My Dad had been a union grievance man, and it was his job to defend workers who had been badly treated either by management, or by other workers. I don't recall him ever demanding that a worker who had walked off the job be reinstated. And he and other union reps had let a pedophile who had molested another worker's child to be fired, rather than standing up for the sleaze bag. I can't believe that my Dad had been the only union guy with scruples.
And yes, we can be productive and green.
I agree, we should teach science, math, and English. Defunding public schools for tax cuts for the rich isn't going to make things any better. And yes, history should be taught in it's purity. If the left has been guilty of political correctness in the past, the right has been just as guilty by putting a conservative slant on things. Recent text books in Texas schools have made a case for the Confederate cause, even denying slavery was the cause of the Civil War. Another recent history book in another southern state's schools even told the outrageous lie that black slaves had served willingly with white Confederate troops. Talk about untruths in school text books.
As for welfare itself being racism - I suppose it's racism to feed and house desperately poor people.
Now excuse me, but my wife has been calling me to dinner for the last five minutes.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

21 Sep 2011, 7:36 pm

Quote:
Recent text books in Texas schools have made a case for the Confederate cause, even denying slavery was the cause of the Civil War. Another recent history book in another southern state's schools even told the outrageous lie that black slaves had served willingly with white Confederate troops.


The Civil War had multiple agendas, not just one.
There were for a fact many volunteer black confederate soldiers. You can look that up.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,743
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 Sep 2011, 7:52 pm

Raptor wrote:
Quote:
Recent text books in Texas schools have made a case for the Confederate cause, even denying slavery was the cause of the Civil War. Another recent history book in another southern state's schools even told the outrageous lie that black slaves had served willingly with white Confederate troops.


The Civil War had multiple agendas, not just one.
There were for a fact many volunteer black confederate soldiers. You can look that up.


Confederate apologists today try to defend the "Cause" by claiming that there were multiple causes of the Civil War, but the fact of the matter is, the Confederate declaration of war makes it clear that the motivation for the rebellion was the preservation of slavery.
And as for black slaves volunteering to fight for the confederacy, I suggest that you get yourself a real history book on the Civil War, rather than the pseudo history written by Confederate apologists.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer