visagrunt wrote:
Liberalism is about creating the greatest opportunities for the greatest number of people. Using the power of the State to redistribute wealth (which the United States does in spades, btw), and to ensure comparable levels of access to public goods--those things that it's in no one's commercial interest to ensure universal access to, but which benefit us all: infrastructure, education, health, employment, and housing.
You are talking about socialism, liberalism is the origin of libertarianism.
The definition has change a lot, but still I don't think it is accurate to define it primarily on the redistribution of wealth.
The word 'Liberals' (note the s) was a dergatory term which these people (social democrats and socialists), then adopted. But this is nothing to do with the Liberal political movement as it was.
Liberals should believe in economic and social freedoms, the Conservatives historically didn't entirely. Perhaps the word came in to play becuase these were traditionally political adversaries.
Social democrat is another moment which in some cases has merged with traditionally Liberal parties, but that is not the same as saying liberalism, is equivalent. Simply people shifted their position or left.
Social democrat also is not as socialist as the Labour movement for example or Fabian Socialism, they believe in social justice, but believe in a more pragmatic approach to the problem, they would argue.