guzzle wrote:
And this is where science behaves like a religion...
Acupuncture has been effectively used for couple of thousand years now.
I disagree. Acupuncture may have been anecdotally valid for centuries, but so has a lot of voodoo.
And science isn't acting like a religion. If it were to act like a religion, it would deny acupuncture as heretical medicine.
In the case of acupuncture, rather than rely on subjective anecdotal evidence, science uses empirical evidence.
Homeopathy was once in the same credibility sphere as acupuncture. Science has proven acupuncture valid, but it has also proven homeopathy invalid. Homeopathy continues to survive because its theory sounds logical and it's backed up by subjective anecdotal evidence.
Acupuncture is still pseudoscience and probably only useful due to the placebo effect.