I hate feminazis

Post Reply New Topic

The "pay gap" isn't a relevant issue regardless, women are not discriminated against as far as employment goes and by most accounts better equipped to deal with the modern economy. Far more women go to college then men in a country that has more and more moved to a society where having a college degree is as necessary as a high school one as far as employment goes.

I don't like intersectional feminists because they often tend to be one-sided. More people prefer the term humanist or egalitarian over feminist because in recent years feminism has become synonymous with radicality, gynarchy or a female-centered world view.

There is far more conclusive evidence for climate change.

I think these groups are to be honest they need to make clear they are not talking about pay gap, but possible issue in getting hired or comparing different careers and their salaries.

Btw is it men and women who contest this claim. Not just men.

Also the technical careers in question most people are not in, that is men and women. It just happens to be that more men are in them. But this is in countries where you have a broader choice of career. In countries where you don't the story can be quite different.

I prefer choice/equality feminist over gender feminist. However I agree with you, we need to stop the divisiveness and understand that discrimination is all over the place and these broad conspiracies model its nature very poorly.

I find it hard to understand why such group are so keen on pigeon-holing people and grading them by their assumed identity, you would think that would be counter to their aims.

The severity of the pay gap is a central tenet of the feminist faith, while climate change is significantly more substantiated.

Christina Hoff Sommers on the subject: http://www.aei.org/publication/the-equa ... ity-check/

I think the by-products of drinking Haterade are a key factor in climate change.

I want my weekly blizzards back. No not the Dairy Queen kind, they're a subsidiary of Haterade corp.

The pay gap is the central tenet of capitalist/liberal feminism. I think there are much more gender issues worth discussing than just the pay gap.

Humanists seek universal cooperation among everyone. Radicals are NOT about cooperation! In fact, radical ideology is a strategy for social competition.

First of all unless there are feminists that really would like a final solution killing off all men we should not be calling them Nazis.

I remember feminists often bieng called man haters back in the '70's when feminism was associated with equal pay and rights with debunking the idea that women exist solely for the pleasure of men. Now some 40 odd years later feminism is associated with creating and manipulating language to ban certain thought, the belief that all men are overt and closet rapists and that women are so fragile they need safe spaces(another good idea whose meaning has been hijacked/redefined by opponents)

My question bieng old and out of touch is not if these extreamist feminists exist, but if they are a fringe part of feminism that has come to define the term because 1. These extremists are loud and persistent 2. It is in the interest of opponents of feminism to redefine the term to mean what the extreme wing of the movement believe?

Ever hear of the SCUM manifesto? I'd like to think of it as as the ramblings of a madwoman not taken seriously by anyone, but there's apparently a play based on it touring here in sweden right now. As part of the presentation, female 7th graders are seated in comfy chairs and given candy, while the male students are seated on the floor and get obscenities shouted at them.

Then there's #KillAllMen and the lovely woman who runs the Femitheist.net blog, with wonderful humanitarian ideas such as "National Castration Day" and the idea of reducing men down to 1-10% of the population in order to achieve "true equality".

While I think the term "feminazi" is pretty dated, and feels extra dirty for being coined by Rush Limbaugh, it's not a comparison that came out of nowhere.

Wow, these women are crazy!

The New York Times, Time Magazine, and USA Today on the pay gap: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/upshot/the-pay-gap-is-because-of-gender-not-jobs.html?_r=0

http://time.com/105292/gender-wage-gap/

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/stubborn-pay-gap-is-found-in-nursing/

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/18/there-is-a-salary-gap-even-when-women-pay-themselves/

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2012/10/24/gender-pay-gap/1652511/

From the times article:

I don't see anything gendered here. A woman putting in 80 hours a week at a corporate firm would earn the same as a man doing the same. It's entirely possible that men on average are more willing to put in those long hours than women on average are, but that's down to individual choices and not an injustice in either direction.

God, no, not matriarchy!


I think this is more the definition of a spoiled brat, male or female.

It really doesn't take much to stir up the anti-femiwhateverists around here. I wonder if men often feel frustrated with women and seek out the extremists to justify their angry feelings. I wonder if it weren't for sex would men have clubbed us all to death eons ago. Guess I can't know, but it feels that way sometimes.

As I have said about a MILLION TIMES BEFORE in case you forget to read, radical ideology is not egalitarian nor concerned with fairness for any and every individual! It is very much a social climbing strategy and the reason why men like me are calling out feminists on their shady behavior is that many of the more outspoken extreme feminists actively target autistic men(along with geek men)
[Redacted: do not make personal attacks] Besides, modern feminism is conditioning women that it's okay for them to act like spoiled brats as this ideology has inculcated them with a sense of entitlement. I mean, they're only human but being female doesn't excuse this kind of behavior.

Last edited by Adamantium on 28 Dec 2015, 12:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.: Personal attack in violation of rule 1

I agree with the first part about radical ideology. Not sure about what shady behaviour you're referring to. But I don't support targeting autistic men for their geekiness.


So are you saying all women act like spoiled brats because feminism has said it's okay. I'm no fan of radical or even everyday feminism, but you seem to be saying all women engage in "this kind of behaviour." Honestly, I think spoiled brattiness is gender neutral.