i am legitimately scared about trump becoming president

Post Reply New Topic

Ok, you are right everyone knows that you lack critical thinking skills, your modus operandi. Everyone knows that you said that criticism of other people means that you are in favor of dictatorial North Korean behaviour. But wait, you criticized ravensxlaw and me. You north korean! Its so easy destroying arguments that contradict themselves.

I get what the right considers welfare.

Yet I'm not blindly supporting the left like you assume.

Personally I think we need 3 nations one for the left, one for the right and one for the other 80% of us. USA is far more purple then blue or red.

As long as Trump is pretending to be a conservative, he can't bribe voters with money from taxation like liberal parties. Though he is rich, he'd soon deplete his own wealth attempting to bribe voters with his own money and that's not likely something any rich person would do since hoarding is more their habit. With increasing population and few jobs, politicians who promise handouts are bound to be more popular.

Yes because there's zero regulations on guns . Not like there thousands and thousands of gun laws on the books. Not like full auto guns are banned, not like having a sbr is restricted, not like we need a permit to carry a gun, not like we have to pay taxes on guns, not like you have to be a certain age to buy or own guns, etc. yep guns aren't regulated at all.

I used it as an example because its something you like and people have supported banning types of music in the past and it could happen again. The 1st amendment is no more safe then the 2nd is, so if you think music is safe from people's anti freedoms they disagree with your wrong. I think a few states banned jazz and rock for a while. Am lot of people think bad violent music like heavy metal and rap cause violent culture.


Because you don't care about guns when Obama says "we should do what Australia did and ban all guns" you just continue on like its static. People have selective hearing when it comes to attacks on stuff they don't care abou or directly effects you. Do you listen and pay attention to all of obamas speeches or clintons for that sake? Gun owners do.

You said your fine with banning simi auto guns and support the supper restrictive (can't go shooting with friends) universal background checks.

A lot of people are single issue voters. A lot of women voted for Obama because of women's rights, others for gay rights. But democrats are not just attacking gun rights they attack many rights. I know if any of them are elected their come for a bunch of my freedoms, if trump is he might take away welfare. He's a unknown he might even turn back to his democrats ways. Personally I'd rather have Ted cruez, or an idea pro gun pro welfar candidate but sadly those are few and will never get support from either party.

He removed your right to medical privacy so that he could use medical records to ban guns, this opens you private information up to others though not jus for gun stuff. But I suppose if you don't care about your privacy and potential employers knowing your infor the oh well. Personally I'm against this attack on aspies and Americans right to privacy. So now he can label all aspies as defective and mentally incompetent and employers can find out which employees are aspies or other disorders and let them go.

As a gun owner, ssi/ssdi receiver, food stamp person, and friends and family who shake weed I actually care quiet a bit about all that. Heck I even think crack should be legal. I'm for people's rights to do what they want as long as it don't effect others, so if someone wants to shoot up with crack in their house that's fine. I personally wouldn't want to but why should people not be able to do stuff because i don't like it. Really can't stand that. Like that person here who thought sex should be illegal because they think sex is disgusting. Republicans don't like me because I support welfare as I know how important it is.


Problem is that the proposed background check systems don't just target violent felons or child molesters. He wants to label aspies as the same as felons, I'm not s felon because I was born with a social disorder, social disorder doesn't make us more violent, it just means we have a hard time socializing in a world where socializing is important. It also makes it a felony to hand your friend you gun, that's an illegal transfer you need to legally transfer the gun to him via background check then when he's done transfer it back, though he can just not and keep it because legally it's his now. You can only do it without background check if it's family spouse or gay partnership, no gf/bf, and non family only if it's for a hunting trip and limited to like 5 days. If I had a gf I couldn't temporary leave a gun with her because she's had someone creeping around her place at night looking in her Windows. Heck if she lived with me I could only leave her alone with the guns in my house up to 14 days before I'd be s felon and her too.
If more people read the proposed background checks they'd probably be against it. Honesty if it was just "you must do a background check when buying a gun to keep as your so" then I wouldn't care other then its basically registration, but it's not it's a bloated law that makes regular people felons for doing stuff most normal people wouldn't be against them doing. The federal one required you go to a federal licensed gun range, those don't exist. Mean they get zoned and get s business permit with the the county but not with the Feds so there'd the no where to shoot, and most people in the northwest and in south west just go out into the forest or desert and shoot. But can't have that as then they wouldn't know if we let our friend shoot our gun, and can't have that oh noes.

If you ban some guns your banning guns, last I checked simi auto guns are guns and so a ban on them is banning guns. As I listed at the start there's tons and tons of regulations on guns already, gun owners feel like we are being strangled more and more. The anti gun people have already regulated us so much and they want more. They use lies like saying you can buy a gun online and have it shipped to your house, but that's been illegal since 1986. No shipping company is going to break the law for people, no gun company is going risk losing their business license and even attempt it. Guns online are shipped to a ffl where you go through a background check and if u fail you don't get the gun or your money back, if you pass you get a gun un inspected that could be scratched up or not what u thought it was. That's just one of many lies Obama and democrats tell to deceive the people in the middle.

...the issue becomes Illegal Atomic Assault Weapons in redneck bigot pickup trucks. ....

Also I think I said high power assualt rifles...does a semi auto even qualify as that?

But yeah I am not the most knowledgeable on the issue but I think at least some on the right are pushing for too loose of regulations like allowing anyone and everyone to buy a gun without any kind of background check even actual high power assualt rifles with no limitations...

I mean like maybe full automatic powerful enough that an average person with no military training has no business with it, sorry I do not know a lot of gun terminology.

I think we're all very scared and we have a right to be so. He'd make a good fuhrer.

Meanwhile, Obama uses his tyrannical powers to protect quality of life over business interests. Such an evil man