Why the Left Loses elections
Antrax wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Bradleigh wrote:
Most people is not all people, your country is punishing the poor for being unable to afford healthcare, my country and every other 1st world country does not have that problem. Why should it be up to the individual for being able to afford being looked after if something bad happened to them? Why do you want to punish children if their parents don't have healthcare either? Why do you think it is better to rely on private insurances that aim to pad their bottom dollar to shareholders, where they are incentivised to try and weasel out paying anything if possible?
The thing is that people like you are so high on the concept that America is the best ever, that you don't realize that it has fallen behind everywhere else in looking after its people.
The thing is that people like you are so high on the concept that America is the best ever, that you don't realize that it has fallen behind everywhere else in looking after its people.
That's what kills me.
Just about every other First World country has had this stuff figured out for a long time. Americans are so afraid of the "socialism" boogeyman that they scream at any thought of universal health care or expanded social programs. The longer I live the more I've come to see the U.S. as a sullen, petulant teenager who thinks they know everything, and the "old people" are a bunch of silly fools that can't grasp his superior youthful "wisdom."
Very ironic choice of metaphor because it's the "old people" who says these programs are a bad idea.
Truth is everything comes at a tradeoff. Do you truly believe the rest of the world is so much better than the U.S. Perhaps explain why 20% of the worlds immigrants reside in a country with 5% of the total population?
After all my time on WP, you'd think I'd learn to avoid using metaphors to make a point.
What I meant was, that the U.S. was the "teenager," and places like Europe and the Netherlands were the "old people" that the "teenager" thought that he knew better than.
Anyway, I apologize for not being clear. I've been a bit grumpy lately in regards to society/politics, so I think I'll bow out of this thread until I'm in a better mood.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
vermontsavant wrote:
The main reason the left looses is because there divided and are always fighting against each other and they are always judging and putting down those within the left wing spectrum that they disagree with.Instead of focusing in on what they do agree on and going from there and accepting with gratitude the support of those who they don't completely agree with.
The right on the other hand works together and accepts all conservative viewpoints even ones they don't like,do you really think Trump likes the religious right,of coarse not he pays hush money to hookers.But he gratefully accepts there support.Do you really think most republicans in America like Trump,of coarse not but they rally around the conservative canidate that is most electable.
A lot of republicans are pro choice but they embrace the religious right because they are conservative,in short the right are not fighting with each other they are banded together to form a strong unit.The left does not do this and this leaves them weak.
The right on the other hand works together and accepts all conservative viewpoints even ones they don't like,do you really think Trump likes the religious right,of coarse not he pays hush money to hookers.But he gratefully accepts there support.Do you really think most republicans in America like Trump,of coarse not but they rally around the conservative canidate that is most electable.
A lot of republicans are pro choice but they embrace the religious right because they are conservative,in short the right are not fighting with each other they are banded together to form a strong unit.The left does not do this and this leaves them weak.
I've read that the Left has less of a sense of a "core identity," so, while it allows them to be more tolerant of homosexuals or other social "outsiders," it causes them to be much more prone to in-fighting among themselves.
In contrast, the Right is less tolerant of "otherness," but they have a stronger sense of party unity.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
XFilesGeek wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
The main reason the left looses is because there divided and are always fighting against each other and they are always judging and putting down those within the left wing spectrum that they disagree with.Instead of focusing in on what they do agree on and going from there and accepting with gratitude the support of those who they don't completely agree with.
The right on the other hand works together and accepts all conservative viewpoints even ones they don't like,do you really think Trump likes the religious right,of coarse not he pays hush money to hookers.But he gratefully accepts there support.Do you really think most republicans in America like Trump,of coarse not but they rally around the conservative canidate that is most electable.
A lot of republicans are pro choice but they embrace the religious right because they are conservative,in short the right are not fighting with each other they are banded together to form a strong unit.The left does not do this and this leaves them weak.
The right on the other hand works together and accepts all conservative viewpoints even ones they don't like,do you really think Trump likes the religious right,of coarse not he pays hush money to hookers.But he gratefully accepts there support.Do you really think most republicans in America like Trump,of coarse not but they rally around the conservative canidate that is most electable.
A lot of republicans are pro choice but they embrace the religious right because they are conservative,in short the right are not fighting with each other they are banded together to form a strong unit.The left does not do this and this leaves them weak.
I've read that the Left has less of a sense of a "core identity," so, while it allows them to be more tolerant of homosexuals or other social "outsiders," but it causes there to be much more prone to in-fighting among themselves.
In contrast, the Right is less tolerant of "otherness," but they have a stronger sense of party unity.
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
firemonkey wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
Sorry, I just don't buy it guys. If you are a true handicap
That gets to the heart of the matter as to how those on the political right view the disabled . They're people to be found guilty unless proven innocent ,within a system where the bar proving you're disabled enough to need support has been raised a significant amount .
It becomes increasingly obvious that the political right has wholeheartedly embraced a thoroughly dishonest and quite abusive mindset .
It wasn't always like that . Things changed for the worse with Thatcher and Reagan . In the UK there was Tory paternalism , yes those people believed there were those who were born to lead and those who were not . However they also believed that they had a responsibility towards those lower down the totem pole .
That was swept away , and replaced by a far more nasty and uncivilised conservatism .
One thing I can't stand about the, "Just get a better job!" line of thinking is: 1) Not everyone has the mental/emotional/physical ability to do everything, and 2) Are there enough "better jobs" out there for everyone?
If all the people who are "poor" suddenly walked off their current job to pursue a STEM degree, or a trade, the only thing that would happen is the value of those skill-sets would plummet. Yes, the U.S. needs engineers and plumbers, but it only needs so many.
Our current system doesn't answer the question if there is truly enough "skilled labor" available for EVERYONE to be able to pull themselves up by their proverbial bootstraps.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
XFilesGeek wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
Sorry, I just don't buy it guys. If you are a true handicap
That gets to the heart of the matter as to how those on the political right view the disabled . They're people to be found guilty unless proven innocent ,within a system where the bar proving you're disabled enough to need support has been raised a significant amount .
It becomes increasingly obvious that the political right has wholeheartedly embraced a thoroughly dishonest and quite abusive mindset .
It wasn't always like that . Things changed for the worse with Thatcher and Reagan . In the UK there was Tory paternalism , yes those people believed there were those who were born to lead and those who were not . However they also believed that they had a responsibility towards those lower down the totem pole .
That was swept away , and replaced by a far more nasty and uncivilised conservatism .
One thing I can't stand about the, "Just get a better job!" line of thinking is: 1) Not everyone has the mental/emotional/physical ability to do everything, and 2) Are there enough "better jobs" out there for everyone?
If all the people who are "poor" suddenly walked off their current job to pursue a STEM degree, or a trade, the only thing that would happen is the value of those skill-sets would plummet. Yes, the U.S. needs engineers and plumbers, but it only needs so many.
Our current system doesn't answer the question if there is truly enough "skilled labor" available for EVERYONE to be able to pull themselves up by their proverbial bootstraps.
In IT fields, they're already dropping the computer science degree requirement in some cases, instead allowing coding boot camps.
Also, in general, open courseware is becoming more and more available, and employers need to be more accommodating of non-traditional learners, and for God sake, ditch the applicant tracking software.
MIT has a good open courseware site:
https://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Now proficient in ChatGPT!
Tim_Tex wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
Sorry, I just don't buy it guys. If you are a true handicap
That gets to the heart of the matter as to how those on the political right view the disabled . They're people to be found guilty unless proven innocent ,within a system where the bar proving you're disabled enough to need support has been raised a significant amount .
It becomes increasingly obvious that the political right has wholeheartedly embraced a thoroughly dishonest and quite abusive mindset .
It wasn't always like that . Things changed for the worse with Thatcher and Reagan . In the UK there was Tory paternalism , yes those people believed there were those who were born to lead and those who were not . However they also believed that they had a responsibility towards those lower down the totem pole .
That was swept away , and replaced by a far more nasty and uncivilised conservatism .
One thing I can't stand about the, "Just get a better job!" line of thinking is: 1) Not everyone has the mental/emotional/physical ability to do everything, and 2) Are there enough "better jobs" out there for everyone?
If all the people who are "poor" suddenly walked off their current job to pursue a STEM degree, or a trade, the only thing that would happen is the value of those skill-sets would plummet. Yes, the U.S. needs engineers and plumbers, but it only needs so many.
Our current system doesn't answer the question if there is truly enough "skilled labor" available for EVERYONE to be able to pull themselves up by their proverbial bootstraps.
In IT fields, they're already dropping the computer science degree requirement in some cases, instead allowing coding boot camps.
Also, in general, open courseware is becoming more and more available, and employers need to be more accommodating of non-traditional learners, and for God sake, ditch the applicant tracking software.
MIT has a good open courseware site:
https://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm
Yeah, I've also heard that "coding" is a mostly crap job.
And the same problem remains: are there enough coding jobs for EVERYONE who is struggling? It works fine as an individual solution, but not a social one.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
XFilesGeek wrote:
Antrax wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Bradleigh wrote:
Most people is not all people, your country is punishing the poor for being unable to afford healthcare, my country and every other 1st world country does not have that problem. Why should it be up to the individual for being able to afford being looked after if something bad happened to them? Why do you want to punish children if their parents don't have healthcare either? Why do you think it is better to rely on private insurances that aim to pad their bottom dollar to shareholders, where they are incentivised to try and weasel out paying anything if possible?
The thing is that people like you are so high on the concept that America is the best ever, that you don't realize that it has fallen behind everywhere else in looking after its people.
The thing is that people like you are so high on the concept that America is the best ever, that you don't realize that it has fallen behind everywhere else in looking after its people.
That's what kills me.
Just about every other First World country has had this stuff figured out for a long time. Americans are so afraid of the "socialism" boogeyman that they scream at any thought of universal health care or expanded social programs. The longer I live the more I've come to see the U.S. as a sullen, petulant teenager who thinks they know everything, and the "old people" are a bunch of silly fools that can't grasp his superior youthful "wisdom."
Very ironic choice of metaphor because it's the "old people" who says these programs are a bad idea.
Truth is everything comes at a tradeoff. Do you truly believe the rest of the world is so much better than the U.S. Perhaps explain why 20% of the worlds immigrants reside in a country with 5% of the total population?
After all my time on WP, you'd think I'd learn to avoid using metaphors to make a point.
What I meant was, that the U.S. was the "teenager," and places like Europe and the Netherlands were the "old people" that the "teenager" thought that he knew better than.
Anyway, I apologize for not being clear. I've been a bit grumpy lately in regards to society/politics, so I think I'll bow out of this thread until I'm in a better mood.
I knew what you meant, I was pointing out the irony of the younger generation telling the older generation that they are behaving like the younger generation on a global scale. Older generations in Europe, the Netherlands etc. tend to be more consevative too, and having elderly family members under the UK NHS I can tell you they don't think much of it. Just about every young person I know from England praises the NHS.
_________________
"Ignorance may be bliss, but knowledge is power."
Antrax wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Antrax wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Bradleigh wrote:
Most people is not all people, your country is punishing the poor for being unable to afford healthcare, my country and every other 1st world country does not have that problem. Why should it be up to the individual for being able to afford being looked after if something bad happened to them? Why do you want to punish children if their parents don't have healthcare either? Why do you think it is better to rely on private insurances that aim to pad their bottom dollar to shareholders, where they are incentivised to try and weasel out paying anything if possible?
The thing is that people like you are so high on the concept that America is the best ever, that you don't realize that it has fallen behind everywhere else in looking after its people.
The thing is that people like you are so high on the concept that America is the best ever, that you don't realize that it has fallen behind everywhere else in looking after its people.
That's what kills me.
Just about every other First World country has had this stuff figured out for a long time. Americans are so afraid of the "socialism" boogeyman that they scream at any thought of universal health care or expanded social programs. The longer I live the more I've come to see the U.S. as a sullen, petulant teenager who thinks they know everything, and the "old people" are a bunch of silly fools that can't grasp his superior youthful "wisdom."
Very ironic choice of metaphor because it's the "old people" who says these programs are a bad idea.
Truth is everything comes at a tradeoff. Do you truly believe the rest of the world is so much better than the U.S. Perhaps explain why 20% of the worlds immigrants reside in a country with 5% of the total population?
After all my time on WP, you'd think I'd learn to avoid using metaphors to make a point.
What I meant was, that the U.S. was the "teenager," and places like Europe and the Netherlands were the "old people" that the "teenager" thought that he knew better than.
Anyway, I apologize for not being clear. I've been a bit grumpy lately in regards to society/politics, so I think I'll bow out of this thread until I'm in a better mood.
I knew what you meant, I was pointing out the irony of the younger generation telling the older generation that they are behaving like the younger generation on a global scale. Older generations in Europe, the Netherlands etc. tend to be more consevative too, and having elderly family members under the UK NHS I can tell you they don't think much of it. Just about every young person I know from England praises the NHS.
Ahh, youth (most). Get about 55 years worth of abuse on your form and get back to me.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
firemonkey wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
Sorry, I just don't buy it guys. If you are a true handicap
That gets to the heart of the matter as to how those on the political right view the disabled . They're people to be found guilty unless proven innocent ,within a system where the bar proving you're disabled enough to need support has been raised a significant amount .
It becomes increasingly obvious that the political right has wholeheartedly embraced a thoroughly dishonest and quite abusive mindset .
It wasn't always like that . Things changed for the worse with Thatcher and Reagan . In the UK there was Tory paternalism , yes those people believed there were those who were born to lead and those who were not . However they also believed that they had a responsibility towards those lower down the totem pole .
That was swept away , and replaced by a far more nasty and uncivilised conservatism .
Do you think that 'things' changed because society changed? More people were goldbricking, instead of working? Disability is supposed to be a rarity, not the norm. Everyone has something wrong with them, that shouldn't constitute disability.
I think the belief that there were more people goldbricking is something that those on the political right , due to their political philosophy and/or lack of intellect , have chosen to embrace .
Most people aren't disabled . However those on the political right spout ignorant BS that says disability is becoming the norm . It isn't . Embracing a false belief that it is allows right wing policy makers to think it is morally acceptable for disabled people to get less and less help and support . As in the eyes of those right wing policy makers most of them are just goldbrickers,scroungers etc . That there aren't masses of people goldbricking etc is an inconvenient truth right wing policy makers chose to ignore .
You could be right.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia
XFilesGeek wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
Sorry, I just don't buy it guys. If you are a true handicap
That gets to the heart of the matter as to how those on the political right view the disabled . They're people to be found guilty unless proven innocent ,within a system where the bar proving you're disabled enough to need support has been raised a significant amount .
It becomes increasingly obvious that the political right has wholeheartedly embraced a thoroughly dishonest and quite abusive mindset .
It wasn't always like that . Things changed for the worse with Thatcher and Reagan . In the UK there was Tory paternalism , yes those people believed there were those who were born to lead and those who were not . However they also believed that they had a responsibility towards those lower down the totem pole .
That was swept away , and replaced by a far more nasty and uncivilised conservatism .
One thing I can't stand about the, "Just get a better job!" line of thinking is: 1) Not everyone has the mental/emotional/physical ability to do everything, and 2) Are there enough "better jobs" out there for everyone?
If all the people who are "poor" suddenly walked off their current job to pursue a STEM degree, or a trade, the only thing that would happen is the value of those skill-sets would plummet. Yes, the U.S. needs engineers and plumbers, but it only needs so many.
Our current system doesn't answer the question if there is truly enough "skilled labor" available for EVERYONE to be able to pull themselves up by their proverbial bootstraps.
The system should be dealing with labour shortages, rather than employment shortages. If everything that needs to be done is getting done, then we're doing ok. Civilization will function.
If everything that needs to be done is getting done and some people are still unemployed, why should we makeup makework jobs for them? "Because I don't want to pay for them" cry some. We still end up paying when people are made to do makework jobs.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
XFilesGeek wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
Sorry, I just don't buy it guys. If you are a true handicap
That gets to the heart of the matter as to how those on the political right view the disabled . They're people to be found guilty unless proven innocent ,within a system where the bar proving you're disabled enough to need support has been raised a significant amount .
It becomes increasingly obvious that the political right has wholeheartedly embraced a thoroughly dishonest and quite abusive mindset .
It wasn't always like that . Things changed for the worse with Thatcher and Reagan . In the UK there was Tory paternalism , yes those people believed there were those who were born to lead and those who were not . However they also believed that they had a responsibility towards those lower down the totem pole .
That was swept away , and replaced by a far more nasty and uncivilised conservatism .
One thing I can't stand about the, "Just get a better job!" line of thinking is: 1) Not everyone has the mental/emotional/physical ability to do everything, and 2) Are there enough "better jobs" out there for everyone?
If all the people who are "poor" suddenly walked off their current job to pursue a STEM degree, or a trade, the only thing that would happen is the value of those skill-sets would plummet. Yes, the U.S. needs engineers and plumbers, but it only needs so many.
Our current system doesn't answer the question if there is truly enough "skilled labor" available for EVERYONE to be able to pull themselves up by their proverbial bootstraps.
In IT fields, they're already dropping the computer science degree requirement in some cases, instead allowing coding boot camps.
Also, in general, open courseware is becoming more and more available, and employers need to be more accommodating of non-traditional learners, and for God sake, ditch the applicant tracking software.
MIT has a good open courseware site:
https://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm
Yeah, I've also heard that "coding" is a mostly crap job.
And the same problem remains: are there enough coding jobs for EVERYONE who is struggling? It works fine as an individual solution, but not a social one.
What kinds of solutions do you think would be best?
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Now proficient in ChatGPT!
Honestly, I have no idea. I'm not exactly a political or economic mastermind.
I just know that the current U.S. system has many flaws that I fear are going to eventually bite us in the butt.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
XFilesGeek wrote:
Honestly, I have no idea. I'm not exactly a political or economic mastermind. I just know that the current U.S. system has many flaws that I fear are going to eventually bite us in the butt.
I'm hoping that I will be in a much better place by then ... maybe even the Philippines!
_________________
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,561
Location: the island of defective toy santas
In the US, "the left" has an odd philosophy.
They think government is better at postal work, medical care, education, managing jails …
However, not at car making, house making, restaurants …
This is confusing logic.
Why is government good at some industries, and not good at other industries?
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.