Ragtime wrote:
If God exists, Dawkins was defeated the moment he first uttered his doubts.
no. his point is more "there is no proof so therefore there is no god." so he's yet to be defeated. god has yet to be proven in any capacity rather less the christian capacity.
Ragtime wrote:
I personally deeply know that God exists. So, to whatever degree I can evidense that knowledge to others, I still have the personal knowledge that Dawkins is wrong. And on a certain level, so does he.
i'll translate what you just said into real people's...what you're saying is you have no idea at all but you believe strongly and that is more than enough proof for you.
you then seek to instill others with the same belief and accepting of a belief as fact rather than just a personal believe that can neither be proven or disproven.
you think dawkins is wrong but you can't prove it. he thinks your wrong and he has more evidence on his side
(the blatant lacking of anything god related in the world other than stories).
That's hearsay and you know it. I'm getting tired of these stupid arguments from Christ-haters like yourself...