Top 17 Reasons Why Gay Marriage is Wrong
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
spdjeanne wrote:
I just want to say that I am a Christian and I support gay marriage. These are not mutually exclusive.
Also, consider the penguin that has wings which its ancestors once used to fly, but now it uses to swim. Is the penguin not using its wings for their natural designed function? Is it immoral for the penguin to swim?
Caveat: this argument assumes that one accept that wacky thing called the Theory of Evolution.
Also, consider the penguin that has wings which its ancestors once used to fly, but now it uses to swim. Is the penguin not using its wings for their natural designed function? Is it immoral for the penguin to swim?
Caveat: this argument assumes that one accept that wacky thing called the Theory of Evolution.
The flippers of a penguin may have been initially for swimming; also, who's to say they didn't evolve from marine reptiles or fish. Why do they have to be flying birds first; that you just presumed apparently, do you have facts to back it up?
Quote:
The question if penguins evolved from non-flying ancestors or just are birds who lost their aviation during time, caused a lot of debating among ornithologists. Now it is generally agreed that penguin flippers are reconstructed wings and they evolved from flying birds indeed.
Closer research of the skeleton and the composition of the proteins proved that the closest relatives of penguins are the Procellariiformes (Albatross, petrels and gulls).
http://www.pinguins.info/FRAMES/Evolutie_eng.html
Closer research of the skeleton and the composition of the proteins proved that the closest relatives of penguins are the Procellariiformes (Albatross, petrels and gulls).
My point wouldn't be any different if penguins evolved from reptiles. In fact, it is widely accepted that birds did evolve from reptiles. At some point, their ancestors would have used a body part or two (not necessarily wings) for a different function than its "intended" purpose causing the penguin ancestor to evolve into a penguin.
I'm not trying to say by this that I think homosexual behavior is the next step in human evolution, but that body parts, although they can become specialized, do not have intended purposes only current purposes. Human beings benefit greatly because many of our body parts are not specialized and have multiple functions like the hands, for example. Without our multipurpose bodies we would not be capable of culture or civilization as we know it or even as it could be.
Since my argument is based on the idea that the theory of evolution is currently the most plausible explanation for how things came to be this way, I suspect that you may not consider it valid.
Averick wrote:
Ah, poor Benjamin. I wonder what would happen say if Ben's offspring turned out gay?
Would he drown his progeny or disown them?![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Would he drown his progeny or disown them?
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Poor child, gay children with homophobe parents, God help them.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Kilroy wrote:
no man I am annoyed because you are persistent in telling me that I and many of my friends (for loving our own gender-or both or wanting to be a different gender) is wrong
you have no idea how that infuriates some people
well of course you don't you think some book is always right
you have no idea how that infuriates some people
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
well of course you don't you think some book is always right
You are annoyed because you don't like my answers. I have not brought up the Bible once and you are now accusing me of using the Bible.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
hmmm, well..., you mentioned scripture posts ago and well, we all know where it comes from, the basic reason of your disaproval of gay relationships comes from the Bible and your religion, even if you haven't directly mentioned it, you have brought up things like "design". Using such arguments with a majority of people here that are not creationists nor they believe in intelligent design, would not have value for them.
My take here is that there is no evidence to support this antigay argument other than a belief system, Moses and Paul writings about homosexuality were written in a society, culture and time when there was ignorance about a lot of things, adding that, the practice being from other societies they hated, like the romans as one example, and being a patriarchal society, all of it which provide enough elements for Doubt.
Is it unnatural? nature itself and the human brain are complicated enough to actually say and claim to really know what is unnatural or what is not. Would Aspergers and Autism be unnatural as well? if so, is it good or bad, a cursed, a blessing?
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Strawmen/parodies. Very interesting. Ridiculing your opponent's side causes victory, wow.
Hmmm, I don't know, but, when someone is ridiculing your opponent's side, you seem to get amused, don't you?
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
spdjeanne wrote:
I just want to say that I am a Christian and I support gay marriage. These are not mutually exclusive.
"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1Corinthians 6:9-10, NIV)"
Last edited by zendell on 09 Apr 2008, 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
zendell wrote:
spdjeanne wrote:
I just want to say that I am a Christian and I support gay marriage. These are not mutually exclusive.
"If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. (Leviticus 20:13, NIV)"
"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1Corinthians 6:9-10, NIV)"
A Christian is someone who follows the teaching of Christ.
neither of your quotes are teachings of christ but rather one is an archaic law from the old testament (pre-jebus) and the other is the first letter from paul to the corinthians which, again, is not jesus and is someone who wasn't even a direct disciple of jesus but a convert post ascension.
so really, neither are teachings of jesus.
zendell wrote:
"If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. (Leviticus 20:13, NIV)"
"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1Corinthians 6:9-10, NIV)"
A Christian is someone who follows the teaching of Christ.
"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1Corinthians 6:9-10, NIV)"
A Christian is someone who follows the teaching of Christ.
And this depends on 2 things:
1) Whether or not she promotes gay acts or simply the establishment of a legal relationship.
2) Whether or not she believes in a liberal theology.
If she does not promote homosexual acts then she can still arguably support homosexual marriage on varying grounds, such as reducing the number of partners that gays have(which leads to both less partners and less spread of disease), compassion(most Christians do not abide by Levitican law and it does not take a liberal theologian to see Christ as a kind figure), or out of a belief that married gays might make better parents than orphanages, especially given that neither of your quotes really are applicable to modern Christians outside of their personal dealings, unless either you believe that Christianity is all about theocracy building(which is questionable since early Christianity was not about seeking control of the government and reasonable arguments can be made for Christians abstaining from government), or unless you believe that Levitican law still holds in its entirety in which case the Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger is now a terrible sin.
If she believes in a liberal theology, then she could very well claim to follow the teachings of Christ but believe that there are culturally based corruptions within them and doubt the inerrancy of the Bible as a means for knowing the will of God. Perhaps you don't believe these people are Christians, but that doesn't prevent them from believing that they are so, and perhaps even better at the task then many conservative Christians. And of course, what skafater84 already stated.
zendell wrote:
spdjeanne wrote:
I just want to say that I am a Christian and I support gay marriage. These are not mutually exclusive.
"If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. (Leviticus 20:13, NIV)"
This is why I'm not a Christian.
_________________
Un-ban Chever! Viva La Revolucion!
Phagocyte wrote:
zendell wrote:
spdjeanne wrote:
I just want to say that I am a Christian and I support gay marriage. These are not mutually exclusive.
"If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. (Leviticus 20:13, NIV)"
This is why I'm not a Christian.
In my opinion, it doesn't seem very Christian of them. Whatever happened to turn thy right cheek, he who is free of guilt cast the first stone, respect thy elderly (Oh wait, that's passed from the old testament.) This Christianity all seems contradictory in itself.
_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
what is natural?
Your relatives.![Image](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Slime_mold.jpg)
Quote:
The body of the woman is designed for the man and the body of the man is designed for the woman;
They weren't "designed" for anything. I thought that I handed your ass to you in slices back in your "proving evolution" thread. Accept it, jerk: your beliefs are rubbish.
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Kilroy wrote:
he's just trying to throw you off as he has no answer
I've been answering everyone. Sorry that I'm a slow typist.
For example, you've been slow to speak out against anti-gay violence in Nigeria and other countries. Personally, I think you condone it. Your kind are responsible for it, jerk. You should have been the first to say something against it. These lunatics might have listened to you. Instead, you let it persist. You let it worsen. It's a witch-hunt, man. Don't you realize that? Don't you realize that you've created a mad witch hunt with your crap? Don't you realize that people like you are responsible for this lunacy? Don't you realize that someone is in danger of being violently murdered for every second that you remain silent on the issue? You are a pathetic human being, interested in nothing but your freaking political agenda. There is no humanity in you. You're a partisan robot. You are a nothing. Next time you consider killing yourself, just do it. I won't miss you.
Quote:
Gay marriage will change the foundation of society;
... gay sex did not exist in ancient Greece and Rome.
Conservatives know best how to create strong families.
Marriage is a religious institution, defined by churches... Christians also never get a divorce.
Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home.
Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.
Straight marriages are valid because they produce children.
Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all
Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets
Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
Being gay is not natural.
... gay sex did not exist in ancient Greece and Rome.
Conservatives know best how to create strong families.
Marriage is a religious institution, defined by churches... Christians also never get a divorce.
Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home.
Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.
Straight marriages are valid because they produce children.
Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all
Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets
Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
Being gay is not natural.
Some people actauly believe the parts of it that I left in the quote there. I heard each one used in an argument against Gay marrege, one way or another. Particularly in Christian churches.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Feel like I'm doing something wrong |
08 Jan 2025, 2:47 pm |
Hello from Michigan! New to Wrong Planet Forums |
02 Jan 2025, 12:07 pm |
What am I doing wrong to explain less luck with dating? |
17 Dec 2024, 7:09 pm |
Diane, 7:42am, December 13th. Entering the Wrong Planet. |
22 Jan 2025, 12:50 am |