Pepe wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
Probably realize that if they engage in a fight they may lose badly.. but if they just wait, the Ukrainians may run out of food and water etc before they do and then be unable to put up much of a fight. May be as simple as that.
Hopefully there’s air backup on the way before that can happen.. that’d be dope.
But pootin has a deadline.
The 9th of May, I have heard.
Economist, Xu Xiaowei, February 26Calculated according to the troops dispatched at that time. I only quote direct expenditures for "military operations" and do not take into account the loss of Russia's overseas assets and sanctions.
Quote:
If Russia's invasion of Ukraine lasts for a month, the cost of personnel, equipment, ammunition, etc. will cost 18 billion US dollars. The damage to personnel and armaments, calculated at 10% of the fixed purchase cost, will cost 5 billion US dollars. The total military expenditure is 23 billion US dollars, accounting for 1.54% of its 2021 GDP and 7.2% of its 2021 fiscal revenue.
If there is no solution for a long time, the Russian army will spend 108 billion US dollars in Ukraine for a year, personnel, equipment operations, ammunition consumption, etc. After one year, the damage to personnel and armaments, calculated at one-third of the purchase cost, will cost another 17 billion US dollars. A total of $125 billion. 8.4% of its 2021 GDP and 39% of its 2021 fiscal revenue.
This really can't last too long.
A prolonged siege is unrealistic.
May 9 sounds like it will keep the budget within a reasonable range, or Russia will get itself into even more trouble. Especially considering their economy itself is not that good.
_________________
With the help of translation software.
Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.