Our New President - President Donald Trump
devilSpawn
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 74
Location: Oregon
Many Arrested Inauguration Day Protesters Will Face Felony Rioting Charges, Prosecutors Say. http://tiny.iavian.net/eu92
Good. There seems to be this attitude of people being able to do anything they want and say anything they want, because of what they perceive as their civil liberties. And of course any law enforcement used against them will be branded as fascism.
Yeah, there does seem to be this attitude of people being able to scribble some s**t on paper and somehow it absolves SOME people from their natural moral duty to do no harm, when of course, it has to do with forcing other s**t that is scribbled on paper upon other defenseless people (still under natural moral obligation to do no harm, I might add) with or without their consent and anyone who speaks regarding how preposterous that really is gets branded a degenerate, worthy of abuses and cruel punishments... even whose "resistance" "justifies" "extreme use of force" aka murder; killing with intent to kill.
devilSpawn
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 74
Location: Oregon
Pardon me, I have been a Catholic my whole life and this current Pope needs to check himself. Most of the Bishops are against him and saying he is the antichrist. He is one of the reasons I have left the Church. Have you noticed that a lot of the Catholics are not supporting this Pope, but the Atheists are? You don't see a problem with that?
Current pope is doing his job. "Once a catholic always a catholic" according the the very sophisticated system of brainwashing they have established over many generations of dominating humans. Of course "Catholic" is not as religious as it seems. It is code for "Roman" which is entirely political... the religion of deified men. The very political system you are governed by. All that being said, this pope is doing his job in getting support from atheists for the "church" role in global politics, he's not worried about losing catholics, as he has said "all must find their own path...(to recognizing and submitting to hierarchy)". They don't care what it is as long as the world is governed by roman government. Is what it is.
Church won't lose any catholics because of him, "once a catholic always a catholic" is a doctrinal law or something. So he's doing his job. Gaining support for Rome's political role.
I know I know, the history buffs are all going to respond with their training ("brainwashing") on queue with "Rome fell(yada yada)..."
but that's not legitimate history. Technically, last Caesar("ceo") of Rome transferred his political authority (executive power) to the Pope of the time. This means that the roman political existence has actually never disappeared, rome just restructured its territories and then started a brainwashing campaign to claim that Rome had fallen, when the real "boss" of Rome for at least 2 centuries before "the fall" was who ended up with the title, after all. Is what it is.
Government is fiction. Man does not have "authority" to "rule". "so let it be written, so let it be done, if you disagree, I'll send a violent one, to punish and subject you to my will with cruelty". This is ancient ongoing atrocity.
Wake up
Then why does wallstreet want it removed?
devilSpawn
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 74
Location: Oregon
So, just out of curiosity, why is "reactionary" a problem? If I, as a white man, notice that terms like "white dude" are being used more and more often in a pejorative manner to discredit and insult, and decide to try and push back on that before it becomes an actual problem as opposed to an annoyance, what's the issue? Do I have to wait until there are mobs in the street before I speak up?
Nobody's ever been lynched for being a "white dude." No one's ever lost out on a job or housing because of it. If you don't like the pejorative use of "white dude," tell the person who said it that you feel wronged. Seriously though, white men will never be a second class of citizens.
devilSpawn
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 74
Location: Oregon
Let me start off by saying, yes, I am diagnosed "requiring substantial support" "without intellectual (duh) or language (questionable) impairment" after many years of misdiagnosis and possible childhood diagnosis kept secret by my mother(puke) from when I was 7-8 years old. I have not had sheltered existence, especially "growing up" in "bible belt(puke)" region of the US(puke).
I am miraculous survivor as 31-year-old blacksheep in wolves' forest. Or more like scapegoat scolded, beaten and banished to the pride's domain (lol).
As I'm sure any who resonate with the little I've said so far also resonate with being "banned" from many expressive outlets (online forum, social media, public view, society, etc, etc), can I assume this site has a policy of protecting autistic "free speech" by not banning autistics from having this outlet?
I get that impression from some of the content of this thread so I will assume such as I get on to responding to your comment...
First,
You must be an old guy who got older programming than kids get today... racism is old world issue, this is the new millennium, it's all about money regardless of skin color.
They keep racism in the spotlight so the sheltered are distracted from what's really going on in the real world; the s**t the unsheltered are experiencing in the real, un-distracted world.
Perhaps you've seen it, perhaps you take common "sheltered" side of it too... war happening right in front of you between rich and poor. Ha. You don't see it, you got different problems distracting you in your shelter. Wait til you are sheltered no more or worse, then you will see what I'm talking about right now.
"White dudes" (high number of autistics), like me, being killed and brutalized every day by police, not just that, by intentional mistreatment and other s**t, too.
Because our disconnects and alienation and "sh***y draw" for "families born into" and our significantly low social and communication vineland scores and being left to somehow survive on our own without any support much less "substantial" and such often make us the manure seating the totem pole of economic class; the scum of society deserving of abuses and cruelties, simply for having the audacity to exist in society's exalted presence (puke); everyday may be the day our time is up and society would generally support it, seems to be the case in the real world from what I've somehow survived and seen.
Skin color doesn't matter, man.
No residence no rights is the going thing now.
It's all about how you dress and carry yourself. You "act" and "present" yourself as someone with money, you are perceived as important and treated with respect. If you act like you have trouble on your own (especially if caught on your own) and "present" yourself with the same clothes everyday, unkempt face and head hair, etc. you are immediately targeted for vicious treatment. Ha. Don't believe it? Follow me around portland (or spokane for that matter) for a week with a hidden camera and we'll go back and mark the footage for all the evidence I experience regularly.
Classism. That's what it's all about today, dude. Racism is just distraction from present reality, an issue of novelty for those who miss the way things used to be...
You don't have your assigned box on cataloged grid, your own private cell in cellblock of your somewhat choosing they do bad things to you and sometimes the people who have their "own" cells do cruel things too. It's "acceptable" and "justified" because "majority rules". Wow.
So where does morality have any place in "society", again?
Second,
If we look at modern social equivalent to "lynching era" events and parameters revolving around that, especially considering "slave patrol" doing much of the lynching... You are absolutely wrong. Refer to my previous too lengthy response covering "white dudes" being killed for being poor as much as any other poor being killed for being poor. Is what it is.
Finally,
I'm convinced that nearly any conversation that can loosely associated with "race" as a subject probably launches an emotional thought train for you, as it does for many many, nonsensically, as far as I can tell. However, surely you don't mean no one has ever lost out on a job or housing simply for being white...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ff2/57ff265f4e08602e0af8a325e43a50c473daa53b" alt="Wink :wink:"
Pardon me, I have been a Catholic my whole life and this current Pope needs to check himself. Most of the Bishops are against him and saying he is the antichrist. He is one of the reasons I have left the Church. Have you noticed that a lot of the Catholics are not supporting this Pope, but the Atheists are? You don't see a problem with that?
Current pope is doing his job. "Once a catholic always a catholic" according the the very sophisticated system of brainwashing they have established over many generations of dominating humans. Of course "Catholic" is not as religious as it seems. It is code for "Roman" which is entirely political... the religion of deified men. The very political system you are governed by. All that being said, this pope is doing his job in getting support from atheists for the "church" role in global politics, he's not worried about losing catholics, as he has said "all must find their own path...(to recognizing and submitting to hierarchy)". They don't care what it is as long as the world is governed by roman government. Is what it is.
Church won't lose any catholics because of him, "once a catholic always a catholic" is a doctrinal law or something. So he's doing his job. Gaining support for Rome's political role.
I know I know, the history buffs are all going to respond with their training ("brainwashing") on queue with "Rome fell(yada yada)..."
but that's not legitimate history. Technically, last Caesar("ceo") of Rome transferred his political authority (executive power) to the Pope of the time. This means that the roman political existence has actually never disappeared, rome just restructured its territories and then started a brainwashing campaign to claim that Rome had fallen, when the real "boss" of Rome for at least 2 centuries before "the fall" was who ended up with the title, after all. Is what it is.
Government is fiction. Man does not have "authority" to "rule". "so let it be written, so let it be done, if you disagree, I'll send a violent one, to punish and subject you to my will with cruelty". This is ancient ongoing atrocity.
Wake up
"Church won't lose any catholics because of him."
You just met one. Of course, the main reason I left was the pedophilia.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
China awards Donald Trump valuable trademark days after he agrees to honour 'One China' policy
China has awarded Donald Trump a 10-year trademark for construction services in his own name, a decade after the businessman began his attempts to have the measure approved.
It is thought to be the first trademark awarded to Mr Trump’s real-estate business since he was elected.
It comes days after the US President said he would stick to the country’s “One China” policy, ending weeks of speculation he could break four decades of foreign policy by addressing Taiwan directly rather than as part of “One China”.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.independ ... html%3Famp
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
The 'One China' policy is a policy of non-intervention, it is not in the interest of the US to pick a side and restart the Chinese Civil War. Independence or rapprochement with the PROC are highly contentious issues in Taiwan/ROC, it is not the US's place to involve itself in their internal affairs. This does not mean that the US must abandon the ROC and it hasn't, it simply means a continuation of the status quo as far as considering the island of Taiwan rather than a separate independent entity.
Campin_Cat
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b314/1b3146b91e4b647af1203d7de6aa5f8b747389cd" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
I get that impression from some of the content of this thread so I will assume such...
No, free speech is NOT protected, on WrongPlanet----your post can be edited by a Mod, or deleted, and you can get banned----you're just a little more free on PPR. The only thing, though, I see wrong with your posts, so far (I only just skimmed them, though), is that you cuss too much, and that'll getcha a warning from a Mod.
Assuming you've read this site's GENERAL rules, here are the PPR rules:
http://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=204613&sid=00fce201e20bf8b1c57aba140df1016f
_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)
I think it is pretty clear that I am not voicing an opinion on the policy.
1) trump is the first president to have publicly talked with the leader in Tiawan in my lifetime
2) Mainland China complains
3) trump acknowledges the one China policy
4) China grants the trademark a few days later after not granting it for the previous 10 years.
You can deny this pattern, but then I will have to assume you are lying or not in touch with reality.
Campin_Cat
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b314/1b3146b91e4b647af1203d7de6aa5f8b747389cd" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Yeah, see----the devil is in the details..... President Trump did NOT "publicly talk" to the leader of Taiwan----it was REPORTED to the public; and, who's to say that other presidents haven't done it, and it wasn't reported.
_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)
[color=#9932CC][b]Yeah, see----the devil is in the details..... President Trump did NOT "publicly talk" to the leader of Taiwan----it was REPORTED to the public; and, who's to say that other presidents haven't done it, and it
Please refer to the last sentence of my previous post.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9fc0/f9fc0a73dd57feae8f63e27df00fdad53bd734e7" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
I think it is pretty clear that I am not voicing an opinion on the policy.
1) trump is the first president to have publicly talked with the leader in Tiawan in my lifetime
2) Mainland China complains
3) trump acknowledges the one China policy
4) China grants the trademark a few days later after not granting it for the previous 10 years.
You can deny this pattern, but then I will have to assume you are lying or not in touch with reality.
Trump accepted a congratulatory phone call from the president of the ROC, it was not a public endorsement for Taiwanese independence.
You 'pattern' is irrelevant and your insinuation poorly thought out
Kraichgauer
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9448b/9448bad1a14a481e19228f10f77575947453353d" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,734
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
-Promises of deregulation
-Promises of personal and business tax cuts
-Promise of repeal of Dodd-Frank
People are making phenomenal money thanks to Trump.
Another proof that the stock market is full of greedy idiot who love to drain money through irrational and unchecked speculation. And wasn't Trump supposed "to drain the swamp" by the way? Guess conservatives like Wall Street after all; they certainly like it better than those who know what they talking about, like university teachers and scientists.
Not to mention, isn't Dodd-Frank supposed to protect people from the financier leaches from taking their money with impunity? How is getting rid of that a good thing, save for the said financier leaches?
That's like saying ....
- Aren't the EPA safe water regulations suppose to protect Flint drinking water?
- Aren't FDA regulations suppose to protect us from one of these many, many litigated drugs we see on tv?
- Won't gun control regulations protect us from gun massacres?
Government regulations are an illusion of safety.
So there's no point in trying?
The bullsh*t in Flint happened because the Republican governor had allowed dirty river water to replace the safe stuff, and was able to get away with it because Flint is a largely poor, black city.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Campin_Cat
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b314/1b3146b91e4b647af1203d7de6aa5f8b747389cd" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Yeah, see----the devil is in the details..... President Trump did NOT "publicly talk" to the leader of Taiwan----it was REPORTED to the public; and, who's to say that other presidents haven't done it, and it wasn't reported.
Please refer to the last sentence of my previous post.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9fc0/f9fc0a73dd57feae8f63e27df00fdad53bd734e7" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
I wasn't addressing "a pattern"----I was simply addressing that ONE point (hence, my quoting only that one), and I felt it was wrong to say President Trump "publicly talked", when he didn't do that. Is there a video clip with audio, somewhere, of President Trump speaking to President Tsai Ing-wen, of Taiwan?
_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)
Kraichgauer
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9448b/9448bad1a14a481e19228f10f77575947453353d" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,734
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Let me start off by saying, yes, I am diagnosed "requiring substantial support" "without intellectual (duh) or language (questionable) impairment" after many years of misdiagnosis and possible childhood diagnosis kept secret by my mother(puke) from when I was 7-8 years old. I have not had sheltered existence, especially "growing up" in "bible belt(puke)" region of the US(puke).
I am miraculous survivor as 31-year-old blacksheep in wolves' forest. Or more like scapegoat scolded, beaten and banished to the pride's domain (lol).
As I'm sure any who resonate with the little I've said so far also resonate with being "banned" from many expressive outlets (online forum, social media, public view, society, etc, etc), can I assume this site has a policy of protecting autistic "free speech" by not banning autistics from having this outlet?
I get that impression from some of the content of this thread so I will assume such as I get on to responding to your comment...
First,
You must be an old guy who got older programming than kids get today... racism is old world issue, this is the new millennium, it's all about money regardless of skin color.
They keep racism in the spotlight so the sheltered are distracted from what's really going on in the real world; the s**t the unsheltered are experiencing in the real, un-distracted world.
Perhaps you've seen it, perhaps you take common "sheltered" side of it too... war happening right in front of you between rich and poor. Ha. You don't see it, you got different problems distracting you in your shelter. Wait til you are sheltered no more or worse, then you will see what I'm talking about right now.
"White dudes" (high number of autistics), like me, being killed and brutalized every day by police, not just that, by intentional mistreatment and other s**t, too.
Because our disconnects and alienation and "sh***y draw" for "families born into" and our significantly low social and communication vineland scores and being left to somehow survive on our own without any support much less "substantial" and such often make us the manure seating the totem pole of economic class; the scum of society deserving of abuses and cruelties, simply for having the audacity to exist in society's exalted presence (puke); everyday may be the day our time is up and society would generally support it, seems to be the case in the real world from what I've somehow survived and seen.
Skin color doesn't matter, man.
No residence no rights is the going thing now.
It's all about how you dress and carry yourself. You "act" and "present" yourself as someone with money, you are perceived as important and treated with respect. If you act like you have trouble on your own (especially if caught on your own) and "present" yourself with the same clothes everyday, unkempt face and head hair, etc. you are immediately targeted for vicious treatment. Ha. Don't believe it? Follow me around portland (or spokane for that matter) for a week with a hidden camera and we'll go back and mark the footage for all the evidence I experience regularly.
Classism. That's what it's all about today, dude. Racism is just distraction from present reality, an issue of novelty for those who miss the way things used to be...
You don't have your assigned box on cataloged grid, your own private cell in cellblock of your somewhat choosing they do bad things to you and sometimes the people who have their "own" cells do cruel things too. It's "acceptable" and "justified" because "majority rules". Wow.
So where does morality have any place in "society", again?
Second,
If we look at modern social equivalent to "lynching era" events and parameters revolving around that, especially considering "slave patrol" doing much of the lynching... You are absolutely wrong. Refer to my previous too lengthy response covering "white dudes" being killed for being poor as much as any other poor being killed for being poor. Is what it is.
Finally,
I'm convinced that nearly any conversation that can loosely associated with "race" as a subject probably launches an emotional thought train for you, as it does for many many, nonsensically, as far as I can tell. However, surely you don't mean no one has ever lost out on a job or housing simply for being white...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ff2/57ff265f4e08602e0af8a325e43a50c473daa53b" alt="Wink :wink:"
Yes, white men have been killed - even lynched - but never because of the color of their skin.
And while race shouldn't matter, it clearly does. Most people who are not white dudes rarely get to be anything but second class citizens, and that is a historic fact.
And yes, I am well aware of the war between the rich and poor, as my dad was a member of the United Steelworkers of America, and my grandfather was a member of the legendary Industrial Workers Of the World. Working people have been vilified for organizing in order to get better wages and benefits. I know how businesses squeeze as much work out of working people, and pay them as little as possible, then damn said working people when they have to seek public assistance to eat, or see a doctor, or to just have a roof over their heads. And guess what: those working people are of all colors, not just white.
As I am fifty years old, maybe I am an old guy in your eyes. But I hardly doubt I'm brainwashed for understanding that racism is a terrible social disease that afflicts our country. Denying it, or placing the blame on non-whites, isn't going to make it any better.
And "slave patrol?" What's that supposed to be?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Biden’s Pardons during last hours as President |
20 Jan 2025, 11:59 am |
South Korean president to lift martial law |
14 Jan 2025, 11:01 pm |
Why ABC News settled with Donald Trump for $15 million |
18 Dec 2024, 11:39 pm |
Donald Trump Asks The SCOTUS To Block Sentencing In His Hush |
08 Jan 2025, 9:46 pm |