Aspie Communists Unite

Post Reply New Topic

Well, if you follow the classical Marxist model then yes, but the generally broad term of 'communism' per se is a typical kind of political structure regardless of arrival process, one that is nearly - if not quite - indistuinguishable from socialism.

You talking about Communism or communism? Communisms a form of goverment, communisms a political philosophy, that can encompass many different forms of goverment that in many cases can completely contradict each other.


Its not democracy they fall through the cracks of, its capitalism. And you dont have to take democracy or communism over the other, you can have both - http://s12.invisionfree.com/the_project


Technically... no. Its what communism is, but Communism manages to fail completely in that regard. Current and past Communist Parties allow their people no power whatsoever - see Tiannamann Square, and the suppression of Alexander Dubceks "Socialism With A Human Face" campaign in the days of the Soviet Union.


Sounds like it ¬_¬


Thats Communism, but not a necessary tenet of communism.


I think the people making these comments are mixing up communism with Communism. There are differences.

Ah yes true, true.

That said, they - along with socialism - all have the same driving force, and that is basically what was said in the original post that started this thread.

Communism (small c) is just the basic idea of everyone being equal. Communism (capital C) is the system of goverment used in China, Cuba and in the past, Russia. Communism (capital C) has the driving force that the guy who started the thread (who, Ive noticed, hasnt posted in it since) what talking about; communism CAN have that driving force, but not necessarily.

I wonder if the poster of this thread actually reads these replies at all.

lol yeh

althogh, in his defence, it IS moving pretty quick, I think Ive started a thread that I couldnt keep up with myself at some point, not sure whether it was on this forum...

But still, I at least TRIED to keep on top of it.

Yeah at least you tried. Did you fail as yet?

yeh, but at least i didnt just give up after the original post ¬_¬

MsAmericanPatriot made one mistake for sure. http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/blondes.asp I'm not a Communist myself, but I am interested in mutualism. I consider myself to be a geo-libertarian. I'm indifferent towards racial nationalism. If you want to live amongst your own kind only, more power to you. I don't see the need however. but as long as no other peoples rights are violated, white nationalism is alright. If the Jews can have there zion, why can't whites have there vinland? maybe we should have neuro-diverse nationalism.

Im not a Communist either, Im a communist (I think Ive explained the distinction, not sure, lemme know if I havent)

"If you want to live amongst your own kind only, more power to you." - I dont see anything particularly wrong with that either, just a little exentric. What I DO see something wrong with is forcing OTHER people to move so you dont have to live around them, the only implementation of "racial nationalism" that Id condone is to find somewhere where theres either nobody (if it still exists on Earth) or only your own kind already and move there, not to herd everyone else out.

Touchy subject but force is not required. it happens spontaneously, people will autmotically congregate together based upon a common trait. i suggest you read the latest thomas sowell(who is by the very not white) work.

i dont mean to be inflammatory but diversity requires force to keep going.

What exactly are you trying to say?

i forgot

Well, next time come up with the reasons first them type. Maybe think about it a little.

soory the medication, oh well heres what is like attracts like ( read the latest tomas sowel work, who very very black by the way, very influential writer and economist) people natural congregrate together based on income eduction culture class, religion, ethnicity, language, neurologic status, politics, national/regional backround and subgroupings of those those things too.

force is not required to make them do this

its force that makes not do this.

People are naturally attratted to place where there are others like them,
for example most towns are either strongly conservative, or strongly liberal

noone rights need be violated. its all unconsciously voluntatry

im not attempting to be offensive, just pointing something out

i hope havent offended ayone, just trying get my "see legs" bacK

Whatever Society is or is not for We all make Society as We want to see it. Nations come and go over time. In any Society or Nation to move forward it needs to grow in understanding. The World is only civilized by the people that make it. That makes any government or system of government what it is in the end.