Kahazidhea wrote:
If you want to attack another person's belief, at least be civil about it.
I always have been, I think. I used to be a Christian, so I've seen it from both sides.
And I consider some other options worse:
To declare all beliefs sacrosanct, for example.
That could give some seriously unpleasant views immunity.
There is no inevitable reason why to test, yes even attack, a belief need imply an attack on the person who holds it. Poor argument, personal insults and generic denigration, however, do crop up too often and blur the distinction.
I've always assuned that:
First person to go Ad Hominem loses.
First person to universalise "All xxx are yyy" loses.
First person to use expletives or other derogatory terms loses.