What is the Difference between Anarchists and Libertarians?

Post Reply New Topic

First pic refers to?

Otpor. The Serbian youth movement that took down Slobodan Milosevic.

Milosevic was more than 10 years ago, surely. (Not that I disagree with what you said.)

Good call. 11 years.

What is the Difference between Anarchists and Libertarians?

Anarchists will relieve themselves on your property, then they will leave.

Libertarians will relieve themselves on your property, then they will demand payment for what they consider a valuable service to the property.

Tadzio

Serbia: Are they free under those who replaced him? “There isn’t enough political will and readiness in the country to fight corruption. So far, the results are disappointing as the laws are improperly implemented, institutions are weak, and enforcement mechanisms almost non-existent,” Vladimir Goati, the head of Transparency Serbia told SETimes.(Dec 2011) They don't sound free to me.

Iceland: The politician who led them into the economic crisis IS STILL IN power. Their currency is so f**ked that they are arranging talks hoping to adopt the Canadian Dollar. This would means that the BofC would dictate their monetary policy.

MENA: Whether it's Libya, Tunisia or Egypt they have merely exchanged one ruler for another. Permit me one example. In Egypt they had one man(Mubarak) ruling them using a military, and now they have a different man ruling them using the EXACT SAME military.

All efforts to overthrow the Masters have failed. Any future attempts will also fail. Wasn't there something about an Occupy Movement going to bring down the 1%....how is that working out?

The picture is Egypt.

Well there was that Russian Revolution thing. And France, three times. And Haïti. And the fall of the Iron Curtain. And the Chinese revolution of 1911. And all of Africa except Ethiopia. And South East Asia except Thailand. And arguably all South America but Brasil. And the United States. And Belgium (1830). I mean, you can argue around that they didn't work by playing with the definition, but they all changed something, for good or ill, and they were all popular movements in one way or the other.

I wouldn't overestimate the power of protests, but saying History proves them wrong is untrue. Yes, taking down one Master generally brings another, but it does not mean it failed in the first place. Also, yes, our silly protests marches are, well, silly, and don't achieve anything, but that could be because they are entirely legal, well organized and tame, unlike what once was.

And the Occupy Movement is nonsense for many other reasons, the first being that they don't do anything in the first place. I don't know why anyone would want to stop them. It's like trying to win a boxing match by staring at you opponent.

Neither group is right

Libertarians belice in a police force and army and a goverment to run them and enforce contracts nothing more

Also to deter and punish bad acts, such as the initiation of force. Basically the government has to deal with people who keep other people awake at night and who scare the horses.

ruveyn

I believe you owe me $5

Didn't some judge just tell Paul to give the money to Peter over "their all" mutual transactions involving some Bernie?



But!! !, ruveyn may have already moved for first dibs!! ! Still, before the calls for any payment, I called hazardous waste management services for info, and with perhaps help from EPA's notice of rights after exhaustion of administrative remedies, I'll not only get my share of SEC Golden wealth back from Peter & Paul, but also, PLUS, the actualization in rewards for damages comorbid with trespass and the actualizations of the various self-identified toxic reliefs of civilly plausible Libertarians.

Tadzio

And what do eastern governments like the People's Republic of China or the government of North Korea or the Saudi Arabian government use?

ruveyn