TheDarkMage wrote:
its clear to me that apart from one or two people on this thread, the rest just havent got a clue. You can spout figures and theories all day and it wont make a difference. the fact is BRITAIN IS OVERCROWDED. saying britain needs more immigrants is like saying the worlds fattest man needs more burgers..
i dont think ive ever heard such denial of truth in my entire life.
maybe if some of you canadians came to london for a few days you would soon see how bad it is.
And there's your critical mistake.
London =/= Britain.
London is overcrowded in the same way that successful cities the world over are crowded. Economic growth happens faster than new infrastructure can be built. London is crowded. New York is crowded. Beijing is crowded. Vancouver is crowded. People migrate from where the jobs aren't to where the jobs are. And when your economy moves from being a manufacturing economy to being a service enconomy, those jobs get increasingly focussed in ever larger centres.
But service economies cannot function without services to provide and customers to buy them--and that means economic growth. The two engines for economic growth are: efficiency and population growth.
From a fiscal policy perspective, it is axiomatic:
a country with an aging population, and a fertility rate below replacement must import the new labour that it is not producing through native births. Any other conclusion is economic folly.
_________________
--James