Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

What do MRAs have against France or the beach?

Page 7 of 7 [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Previous topic | Next topic

AspieRogue

26 Nov 2012, 11:49 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
It is precisely this dynamic – women good/men bad – that has destroyed the relationship between the sexes. Yet somehow, men are still to blame when love goes awry. Heck, men have been to blame since feminists first took to the streets in the 1970s.
It is funny. Cause early this morning I was about to post this link as an example of Fox News idiocy and the overall stupidity and bigotry between the people that tout for so-called men's rights.

But then I regretted it. I thought to myself "nay. Besides of Inuyasha nobody in WP.net would take Fox News seriously and quite frankly it is a dead horse".

So, thanks for the lesson...

It is a bit dumb to even claim that there is a war on men specifically in a country in which congressmen still get to discuss whether or not they can decide whether women should be pregnant or do the ultra so-so progressive and "radical" to them thing of letting them choose.

So I will begin linking to this: http://jezebel.com/5963161/fox-news-pub ... war-on-men

Now, let me say a couple of things:
Quote:
It’s the women who lose. Not only are they saddled with the consequences of sex, by dismissing male nature they’re forever seeking a balanced life. The fact is, women need men’s linear career goals – they need men to pick up the slack at the office – in order to live the balanced life they seek.

Fortunately, there is good news: women have the power to turn everything around. All they have to do is surrender to their nature – their femininity



All of this moronic article is based on the authors unfounded assumptions about "feminity" and what women's nature is supposed to be. I don't really understand why are we still given forum to idiots like this.




Funny enough, those congressmen you speak of who made such remarks lost his seat to an opposing party member. So yeah, that is what happens to politicians who make flippant rape apologist comments: They LOSE their job!

And then you have states like Oregon which, thanks to stupid myopic feminists, have a non-domestic stalking protective order with unlimited duration and all a woman has to do to get one(regardless of actual evidence) is to petition a judge and use the right language and it is *he* who is guilty until proven innocent! This happened to an aspie friend of mine. A stupid, over-privileged white girl got one against him even though she never actually met him. All because she thought he was "creeeeeeeeeeeeepy" and she lived in his neighborhood.