Evolution is the biggest lie ever told !

Post Reply New Topic

The earth hath existed waste and void - Genesis 1:2 - Young's Literal Translation.

Existed - past tense.

What does that have to do with your thesis that science is bad and nefarious?

Scientists are mostly con-men that seek money by pretending they know what they're talking about.

These con-men are nefarious and dangerous, because their PHD degree gives them respect, and power over people.

We see this on television with the daily lawyer commercials .... "Have you been a victim of a scientist..."? .... sueing these con-men for their harmful drugs, or cancer-causing materials.

Your child might be forced to take drugs, because some full of sh*t PHD con-man said so.

We have seen on WP , con-men PHD who torture ASD people at that Canadian ASD facility.

Some of these con-men are just idiots, and blindly believe their own bullcrap, however, even they still cause harm.

The fact that people here echo the words of these con-men shows you the power of their persuasion.

The truth is these con-men don't understand reality, never will, and mostly don't care. They care about the money.

That will happen naturally.

Scientists are mostly con-men that seek money by pretending they know what they're talking about.

These con-men are nefarious and dangerous, because their PHD degree gives them respect, and power over people.

Creationists: Explain this.



These are all real fossils. Am I supposed to believe that this is all a coincidence?

Smaller horse fossils are found in older rocks. Isn't there a pattern here?

Homologus structures, all of these evolved from a common ancestor.

There were one hundred of them-biologists, chemists, zoologists, physicists, anthropologists, molecular and cell biologists, bioengineers, organic chemists, geologists, astrophysicists, and other scientists. Their doctorates came from such prestigious universities as Cambridge, Stanford, Cornell, Yale, Rutgers, Chicago, Princeton, Purdue, Duke, Michigan, Syracuse, Temple, and Berkeley.

They included professors from Yale Graduate School, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Tulane, Rice, Emory, George Mason, Lehigh, and the Universities of California, Washington, Texas, Florida, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Ohio, Colorado, Nebraska, Missouri, Iowa, Georgia, New Mexico, Utah, Pennsylvania, and elsewhere.

Among them was the director of the Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry and scientists at the Plasma Physics Lab at Princeton, the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institute, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Lawrence Livermore Laboratories.

And they wanted the world to know one thing: they are skeptical.

After spokespersons for the Public Broadcasting System's seven-part television series Evolution asserted that "all known scientific evidence supports [Darwinian] evolution" as does "virtually every reputable scientist in the world," these professors, laboratory researchers, and other scientists published a two-page advertisement in a national magazine under the banner: "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism."

Their statement was direct and defiant. "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life," they said. "Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."

These were not narrow-minded fundamentalists, backwoods West Virginia protesters, or rabid religious fanatics-just respected, worldclass scientists like Nobel nominee Henry F. Schaefer, the third mostcited chemist in the world; James Tour of Rice University's Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology; and Fred Figworth, professor of cellular and molecular physiology at Yale Graduate School.

Together, despite the specter of professional persecution, they broached the politically incorrect opinion that the emperor of evolution has no clothes.

As a high school and university student studying evolution, I was never told that there were credible scientists who harbored significant skepticism toward Darwinian theory. I had been under the impression that it was only know-nothing pastors who objected to evolution on the grounds that it contradicted the Bible's claims. I wasn't aware that, according to historian Peter Bowler, substantive scientific critiques of natural selection started so early that by 1900 "its opponents were convinced it would never recover."

Viewers of the popular 2001 PBS series weren't told that, either. In fact, its one-sided depiction of evolution spurred a backlash from many scientists. A detailed, 151-page critique claimed it "failed to present accurately and fairly the scientific problems with the evidence for Darwinian evolution" and even systematically ignored "disagreements among evolutionary biologists themselves." - Lee Strobel, 'The Case for a Creator'

God, what a load of shyte. Do you have ANY evidence whatsoever to back up your, positively barmy, claim?"Pretending to know what they are talking about..." - No, they usually DO know what they are talking about, because it happens to be what they do for a living.

It could be the case that when you wrote this silly nonsense you had the "science" of global warming/climate change/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it in mind, where politicisation has occurred to such an extent that there is little, if any, actual science left. That is, however, an exceptional case. Things usually don't get so out of hand, but one can blame others for this, not scientists (ex. "science reporters", politicians, economists, naive environmentalists...).

You know that some people need drugs to live right?

If you want to live in a world without science, move to Saudi Arabia.

You aren't a victim of science. You are consciously choosing to be a victim in order to gain sympathy.

Choose to be a winner instead. Have you ever tried that?

Here's an idea. If you think that people with PHDs are controlling the world, you should go out there and get yourself a PHD. You'll discover that it's not easy. Scientists work their asses off so that you can live the cozy lifestyle that you take for granted.