Page 7 of 21 [ 331 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 21  Next

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

17 May 2022, 10:49 am

magz wrote:
One could as well claim that the South should undo their loss of Civil War and bring back slavery.
The same thing could be accomplished by England undoing their defeat in the Revolutionary War.

Imagine the restoration of not only slavery, but also the subjugation of women; imperialistic expansion by genocide of native peoples; religious persecution; abolition of due process; and the rights to free speech, free press, voting, and ownership of real-estate held only by wealthy, white, protestant males.

Undoing the fall of Russia is mere fantasy.



Last edited by Fnord on 17 May 2022, 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

carlos55
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,999

17 May 2022, 10:50 am

magz wrote:
carlos55 wrote:
Russia sees Nazism as hatred of Russians only nothing to do with Jews.
In other words - paint whoever does not like me, for a good reason or not, as nazi. Handy. No responsibility for all the harm I did when those who hold a grudge against me are nazi by definition. Ain't it nice?

carlos55 wrote:
When the new style gov came to power back in 2014 they banned the Russian language
No, they didn't. Half of Ukrainians are native Russian speakers, includiung the president. They weren't banned nor rejected.
And don't you even go into the 2014 events in Donbas. I've met enough people who had to flee when the separatists took power and I've heard enough of what it looked like.

carlos55 wrote:
Ukraine needs a more inclusive gov reflective of its ethnic population
It does have. Jews, Tatars, Ukrainian-speakers, Russian-speakers - all are in the current Ukrainian govt. It's much more diverse than in many other countries, Russia included.
Russia should be more inclusive with all the ethnicities inhabiting Russian Federation - Buryats, Chechens, Chukchas, Tatars, countless others - to have fair representation in decision-making processes. Why are they calling others to do something they don't?

carlos55 wrote:
Also the countries surrounding Russia should remain neutral and not join NATO
Why TF do you tell us what to do?
In an ideal world, Rusia would not be a threat, so there'd be no need for us to join NATO - but they've proven beyond any doubt that we're not living in this ideal world. Art 5 is why my city has been not been shelled yet.


Hitler’s nazism had the Russian Slavs down near the Jews in the racial pecking order.

So Russians see nazism as hatred of Russians, Jews and disabled people in no particular order even if one or two is omitted.

What I mean is nazism is just plain racism with a racial supremacy pecking order.

It’s not just white people Black people can believe in racial supremacy just as Jews and Muslims.

There’s no I’m not a Nazi get out clause because my racial group was victim last time round

Nazism is just hate and anyone can hate

Also I’m not saying scrap nato just create a neutral zone around Russia’s border like Ukraine, belerus, Finland etc.. It appears they just don’t want US bases near them.

Advancing into neutral territory after a treaty is just as much an act of war as invading an article 5 country.

Article 5 is over rated anyway the biggest open secret of the Cold War was the US was not going to loose NY or Washington in a nuclear exchange over Europe.

It just wouldn’t, they clearly won’t fight for Ukraine now and they won’t loose NY in the future just because a piece of paper is signed by Ukraine.

Sure tensions would be super high there may be a breaking of relations a phony war may be declared.

But at the end of the day the US won’t end itself over a country thousands of miles away, just as the USSR wouldn’t have done for Cuba.


_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."

- George Bernie Shaw


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

17 May 2022, 11:02 am

carlos55 wrote:
Hitler’s nazism had the Russian Slavs down near the Jews in the racial pecking order.

So Russians see nazism as hatred of Russians, Jews and disabled people in no particular order even if one or two is omitted.
Guess where Poles fell into this equation?
Genocided from both sides.
Shot at by Germans, raped, looted and shot at by Soviets.

carlos55 wrote:
What I mean is nazism is just plain racism with a racial supremacy pecking order.

It’s not just white people Black people can believe in racial supremacy just as Jews and Muslims.

There’s no I’m not a Nazi get out clause because my racial group was victim last time round

Nazism is just hate and anyone can hate
Then let's admit it: Putin is nazi.

carlos55 wrote:
Also I’m not saying scrap nato just create a neutral zone around Russia’s border like Ukraine, belerus, Finland etc.. It appears they just don’t want US bases near them.

Advancing into neutral territory after a treaty is just as much an act of war as invading an article 5 country.

Article 5 is over rated anyway the biggest open secret of the Cold War was the US was not going to loose NY or Washington in a nuclear exchange over Europe.

It just wouldn’t, they clearly won’t fight for Ukraine now and they won’t loose NY in the future just because a piece of paper is signed by Ukraine.

Sure tensions would be super high there may be a breaking of relations a phony war may be declared.

But at the end of the day the US won’t end itself over a country thousands of miles away, just as the USSR wouldn’t have done for Cuba.
You're basically denying others a right to join an alliance for protection, partially directly, partially by devaluating the idea of the alliance.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

17 May 2022, 11:08 am

Pay attention to Magz, comrades; she and her family have live through the Cold War AND Soviet rule.

Anything she says about either one can be trusted.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

17 May 2022, 11:20 am

I'm not omniscient, lol.
I just have close look on some things, with my own experiences, my family's experiences, experiences of the people I know, including several Russians and Ukrainians.
And I follow the topic closely because it does directly influence my life.

What annoys me really seriously is when people ignore that nations other than USA and Russia (and China) have their own points of view, their own interests and their own right to choose paths and alliances. We get denied this even if it's literally our lives at stake. Like we weren't peoples and societes, only tokens in games of some big fish.
That's still the bitter taste after Yalta Conference.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

17 May 2022, 11:28 am

Neutral Zones are nonsense.

Reminds me of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) during Vietnam.

They would be an unjustifiable concession to Russia.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

17 May 2022, 11:34 am

magz wrote:
I'm not omniscient, lol.  I just have close look on some things, with my own experiences, my family's experiences, experiences of the people I know, including several Russians and Ukrainians.  And I follow the topic closely because it does directly influence my life.
That is what I had in mind when I sat your word could be trusted.
magz wrote:
What annoys me really seriously is when people ignore that nations other than USA and Russia (and China) have their own points of view, their own interests and their own right to choose paths and alliances.  We get denied this even if it's literally our lives at stake.  Like we weren't peoples and societies, only tokens in games of some big fish.  That's still the bitter taste after Yalta Conference.
For those unwilling to do their own web searches . . .
Wikipedia wrote:
The Yalta Conference (codenamed Argonaut), also known as the Crimea Conference, held 4–11 February 1945, was the World War II meeting of the heads of government of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union to discuss the postwar reorganization of Germany and Europe.  The three states were represented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and General Secretary Joseph Stalin, respectively.
It was like three wolves deciding how to divide a flock of sheep.



Last edited by Fnord on 17 May 2022, 11:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

17 May 2022, 11:34 am

In retrospect, the Yalta Conference was “the Big Three” divvying up the spoils—for only the “Big Three.”

Everyone else was a pawn in their game.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

17 May 2022, 11:34 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
Neutral Zones are nonsense.

Reminds me of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) during Vietnam.

They would be an unjustifiable concession to Russia.
Yep.
And tens of millions of people in those "neutral zones" are to be denied a right to join alliances?
"Demilitarized zones" are most often uninhabited - for a reason...


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


carlos55
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,999

17 May 2022, 11:35 am

Fnord wrote:
Pay attention to Magz, comrades; she and her family have live through the Cold War AND Soviet rule.

Anything she says about either one can be trusted.


I accept the bad things the Russians did at the start of WW2 to Poland and during the Cold War.

But at the end of the day if a nuke hits your city and kills many in your family or if your given just a few days to live because you’ve had a lethal dose of radiation will you think im glad we expanded NATO to Russia’s border and we to war

Or

I wish we just found a way to all get on


_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."

- George Bernie Shaw


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

17 May 2022, 11:37 am

I genuinely prefer taking the risk of being nuked (we've heard threats for the last 20 years, I've had time to think it over) over falling back to "Russian world".


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

17 May 2022, 11:39 am

carlos55 wrote:
. . . But at the end of the day if a nuke hits your city and kills many in your family or if your given just a few days to live because you’ve had a lethal dose of radiation will you think im glad we expanded NATO to Russia’s border and we to war. . .
Apropos of nothing.  The only people objecting to NATO seem to be those who are expressing support for Russia.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

17 May 2022, 11:42 am

Sweden and Finland are expressing with action, what they think about "expanding NATO to Russia’s border"'s risk-benefit balance in the face of current threats...


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


SkinnedWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2022
Age: 26
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,538
Location: China

17 May 2022, 12:00 pm

magz wrote:
What annoys me really seriously is when people ignore that nations other than USA and Russia (and China) have their own points of view, their own interests and their own right to choose paths and alliances. We get denied this even if it's literally our lives at stake. Like we weren't peoples and societes, only tokens in games of some big fish.

China in modern history was once the fish itself on the chopping board. But the internal forces at that time kneaded the various ethnic groups into a "Chinese nation".(This has also led to deliberate confusion over the translation of ethnic/nation in our language.) (note: this predates the CCP)

The EU is a sensible and necessary idea, if it works well.
Singapore is another way, a highly efficient player under a centralized operation.

I don't believe this rule will ever be changed in the foreseeable future, so I support that groups bound by it can take action to protect themselves from harm.


_________________
With the help of translation software.

Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.

You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.


Last edited by SkinnedWolf on 17 May 2022, 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

17 May 2022, 12:07 pm

SkinnedWolf wrote:
The EU is a sensible and necessary idea, if it works well.
The EU and NATO would not be necessary if the former Soviet Union and Russia were not so aggressively imperialistic.

Russia is like a playground bully who chooses his victims for their lack of friends.

The EU and NATO are like groups of friends saying, "Come join us" to the bully's past, present, and future victims.



SkinnedWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2022
Age: 26
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,538
Location: China

17 May 2022, 12:15 pm

Fnord wrote:
SkinnedWolf wrote:
The EU is a sensible and necessary idea, if it works well.
The EU and NATO would not be necessary if the former Soviet Union and Russia were not so aggressively imperialistic.

I only mention the EU because a particular member of NATO makes me wonder if its purpose is always so credible.
But if it's the only option to protect yourself, it's still necessary.


_________________
With the help of translation software.

Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.

You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.