Sand wrote:
What is more important to me is whether God believes in me. I haven't seen Him around or heard his footsteps and the written material ascribed to him is much too ridiculous to have been written by a God. So I feel left out.
I have been considering the idea that god may be an interested observer. A scientist of sorts who watches and does not interfere. He does not want to change the rules by acting in the universe like human scientists observing animal behaviour try not to change the rules by not interfering with animals. If this is the case, then god does not want people to believe in him without evidence and since he does not provide evidence, it is right not to believe in him. Perhaps if there is an afterlife god will be annoyed in the theists for going against his will that humans not know about his existence. This would be a highly ironic situation. The theists are the blasphemers not the agnostics or atheists.
I am an agnostic so I cannot so one way or another but I do not have any evidence to suggest that god does exist.