Meowpurr wrote:
Aren't you using the same scare tactics using pictures that have been regurgitated time and time again to promote several agendas using multiple arguements for several different topics?
Partial birth abortion is not necessary to save a mother's life. If you want pics here you go. Tell me how this is saving the mother's life.
"Tell me how..." I never said that partial birth abortion was "necessary to save a mother's life" by it's very nature. It is when it is and it isn't when it isn't.
Listen, dude. Partial birth abortion is actually an uncommon procedure. And it's hardly ever done except to save a mother's life. That's what I meant.
If your placenta became gangrenous and guaranteed your death from septicemia during the next 24 hours and the only choice was removal of the entire reproductive apparatus, what would you do? If the doctors told you that a six-month old fetus had priority over you and just stood around to watch you die (and--duh--what's fatal for mom is fatal for baby), how would you react?
You know what's barbaric? Cutting people up with knives, poisoning people, exposing people to radioactive material, sticking probes in people, sawing people's skulls in half, pumping people full of unnatural chemicals, cutting organs out of people, putting said organs into other people, and denying people solid food. That's surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, exploratory procedures, neurosurgery, pharmaceuticals, life-saving (organ of choice)-ectomies, organ transplantation, and recovery diets for people with serious gastrointestinal infections.
_________________
Powered by quotes since 7/25/10