Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Homosexuality

Page 61 of 93 [ 1477 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 ... 93  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

10 Aug 2007, 5:30 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
greenblue wrote:
How did you come up to the conclusion that Sopho hates men?

Yeah I would like to know this too (for about the tenth time... lol)

You made a post to that effect quite a while ago, when I was lurking for a short time.

Why are you replying to me when I was clearly waiting for Ragtime's response? Didn't you criticise me for this before?
And I don't recall ever claiming that Ragtime hated a particular group of people when I had absolutely no reason to believe that.

You made ten posts on it effectively asking for attention, i thought I would give you some, dearie...

and you are the one who says is being attacked :roll:

I guess Ragtime didn't answer becuase he realised he screwed up?


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 5:33 pm

greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
greenblue wrote:
How did you come up to the conclusion that Sopho hates men?

Yeah I would like to know this too (for about the tenth time... lol)

You made a post to that effect quite a while ago, when I was lurking for a short time.

your point being.....?

*sighs* I thought I was clear. Stop being obtuse.

That was a valuable question
and you feel attacked when you are the one who is attacking, aren't you?

*snorts* Have you pooped your diapers by any chance. I still see no thread on intensity calling me out...



Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 5:38 pm

greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
greenblue wrote:
How did you come up to the conclusion that Sopho hates men?

Yeah I would like to know this too (for about the tenth time... lol)

You made a post to that effect quite a while ago, when I was lurking for a short time.

Why are you replying to me when I was clearly waiting for Ragtime's response? Didn't you criticise me for this before?
And I don't recall ever claiming that Ragtime hated a particular group of people when I had absolutely no reason to believe that.

You made ten posts on it effectively asking for attention, i thought I would give you some, dearie...

and you are the one who says is being attacked :roll:

I guess Ragtime didn't answer becuase he realised he screwed up?

Well if he did I saved his bacon.



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

10 Aug 2007, 5:41 pm

Sedaka wrote:
i sincerely doubt you'd walk away if i were infront of you on my knees

Then you misjudge me. I am quite the stoic.



Last edited by Ragtime on 10 Aug 2007, 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 5:44 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
greenblue wrote:
How did you come up to the conclusion that Sopho hates men?

Yeah I would like to know this too (for about the tenth time... lol)

You made a post to that effect quite a while ago, when I was lurking for a short time.

Why are you replying to me when I was clearly waiting for Ragtime's response? Didn't you criticise me for this before?
And I don't recall ever claiming that Ragtime hated a particular group of people when I had absolutely no reason to believe that.

You made ten posts on it effectively asking for attention, i thought I would give you some, dearie...

Ten posts on what?
Accusing Ragtime or asking for an explanation from him?
And I'm definately not looking for attention. There would be better places to go if that was what I wanted. Who am I going to want attention from in here anyway, you? Ragtime? lol



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 5:48 pm

Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
I guess Ragtime didn't answer becuase he realised he screwed up?

Well if he did I saved his bacon.

How? By saying I was looking for attention? lol
I posted it so many times because I wanted an explanation and I didn't want him to be able to just get away with not responding.



Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 5:50 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
greenblue wrote:
How did you come up to the conclusion that Sopho hates men?

Yeah I would like to know this too (for about the tenth time... lol)

You made a post to that effect quite a while ago, when I was lurking for a short time.

Why are you replying to me when I was clearly waiting for Ragtime's response? Didn't you criticise me for this before?
And I don't recall ever claiming that Ragtime hated a particular group of people when I had absolutely no reason to believe that.

You made ten posts on it effectively asking for attention, i thought I would give you some, dearie...

Ten posts on what?
Accusing Ragtime or asking for an explanation from him?
And I'm definately not looking for attention. There would be better places to go if that was what I wanted. Who am I going to want attention from in here anyway, you? Ragtime? lol

I stepped in and saved him the bother. And yes 10 posts askig for a response like that is attention seeking, forgive me for feeding you...
Oh and GreenBlue, you have been called out. Go and look.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

10 Aug 2007, 5:50 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Gays have less children than Hetrosexuals
More gay people reduces birth rate.
Promoting homosexuality increases the amount of people choosing to be gay (as bisexuals undergo more homosexual relationships etc)
Reduced birth rate has to be made up for, or we end up with economic problems
Immigration makes up reduced birth rate
Too much immigration leads to social instability.
Now what dont you follow?


and how have you missed my point that gays can't put a dent in population distributions........................

think how exponential growth works... seriously, take a math class

ive said that before...

Yes they can. Less indigenous people having children lowers the birth rate, which has an effect on future generations. As for maths, i think I know my stuff on that one.


unless you're gonna specify and say illegal immigration.... then it doesnt matter where the kids come from**

and as for math......... no, you havent demonstrated that... so think all you want

**unless you wanna play up the emmigration aspect... and it's not gays making ppl leave

I am talking about legal immigration, and bear in mind my posts relate to the UK. We have a low birth rate. It is topped up to an acceptable level by immigration. Increasing the amount of gay people reduces the amount of immigration.
As for the maths front, I have two A-levels in the subject, more than likely both with top grades in them.

1. What are you so sure that it will be an economic repercussion because of this? you really aren't that sure, are you? You are not even 100% sure if your claims about gays being because of choice is really truth.

2. Wouldn't society adjust somehow if that would be the case? We are not in the 1940s anymore you know.

2.5 As you may know, there is no single solution to economy problems, the Nazis had one, and if they had won, probably their economy would have been great, but is that the best path to follow to solve those problems?

3. Explain to me this: Hate groups have used the economy thing as an argument to support their hatred, can you tell me this is different? if not, why?


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 5:52 pm

Hadron wrote:
I stepped in and saved him the bother. And yes 10 posts askig for a response like that is attention seeking, forgive me for feeding you...
Oh and GreenBlue, you have been called out. Go and look.
You didn't save him from anything. He STILL hasn't answered. I'm not looking for attention. I could get attention easily through other means, if I wanted. But I don't. I will continue posting about it until he gives me a response.



Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 5:58 pm

greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Gays have less children than Hetrosexuals
More gay people reduces birth rate.
Promoting homosexuality increases the amount of people choosing to be gay (as bisexuals undergo more homosexual relationships etc)
Reduced birth rate has to be made up for, or we end up with economic problems
Immigration makes up reduced birth rate
Too much immigration leads to social instability.
Now what dont you follow?


and how have you missed my point that gays can't put a dent in population distributions........................

think how exponential growth works... seriously, take a math class

ive said that before...

Yes they can. Less indigenous people having children lowers the birth rate, which has an effect on future generations. As for maths, i think I know my stuff on that one.


unless you're gonna specify and say illegal immigration.... then it doesnt matter where the kids come from**

and as for math......... no, you havent demonstrated that... so think all you want

**unless you wanna play up the emmigration aspect... and it's not gays making ppl leave

I am talking about legal immigration, and bear in mind my posts relate to the UK. We have a low birth rate. It is topped up to an acceptable level by immigration. Increasing the amount of gay people reduces the amount of immigration.
As for the maths front, I have two A-levels in the subject, more than likely both with top grades in them.

1. What are you so sure that it will be an economic repercussion because of this? you really aren't that sure, are you? You are not even 100% sure if your claims about gays being because of choice is really truth.

2. Wouldn't society adjust somehow if that would be the case? We are not in the 1940s anymore you know.

2.5 As you may know, there is no single solution to economy problems, the Nazis had one, and if they had won, probably their economy would have been great, but is that the best path to follow to solve those problems?

3. Explain to me this: Hate groups have used the economy thing as an argument to support their hatred, can you tell me this is different? if not, why?

1. Basic understanding of pensions, as I outlined earlier.
2. Adjust how exactly, i doubt any move that could be made would be good.
2.5 I was just pointing out how gay people are a factor, i certainly did not say or imply that making gay marriage laws would have a massive impact, its the cumilative effect of many smaller things that make an economy.
3. I am not advocating mass murder, or any murder to start with. Do I need to continue
Oh, and answer your call out on Intensity, I dare you.



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

10 Aug 2007, 6:00 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
I guess Ragtime didn't answer becuase he realised he screwed up?

Well if he did I saved his bacon.

How? By saying I was looking for attention? lol
I posted it so many times because I wanted an explanation and I didn't want him to be able to just get away with not responding.


I generally try to avoid responding to silly questions, but alas, am usually unsuccessful at restraining myself. I find it interesting that my accusation touched such a nerve with you (which is a rare thing for you -- you're usually pretty laid-back and/or cocky). So I wanted to see how long you'd squirm about it. You see, I never said you SAID you hated men. I simply stated what must be likely be true at least on some level, if you truly can NEVER, EVER, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, do a man. I mean, come on, that's quite an absolute, seeing as how you've got the parts for it. I just assumed you have a severe problem with the very fact that they're men. I mean, there are some VERY effiminate men, who basically have women's personalities. No other factor is left for you to object to except for the mere FACT that they are designated "men". Because, with the extreme variety of "men" that exist, I find it impossible to believe you couldn't halfway enjoy even one!



Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

10 Aug 2007, 6:02 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
I guess Ragtime didn't answer becuase he realised he screwed up?

Well if he did I saved his bacon.

How? By saying I was looking for attention? lol
I posted it so many times because I wanted an explanation and I didn't want him to be able to just get away with not responding.


I generally try to avoid responding to silly questions, but alas, am usually unsuccessful at restraining myself. I find it interesting that my accusation touched such a nerve with you (which is a rare thing for you -- you're usually pretty laid-back and/or cocky). So I wanted to see how long you'd squirm about it. You see, I never said you SAID you hated men. I simply stated what must be likely be true at least on some level, if you truly can NEVER, EVER, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, do a man. I mean, come on, that's quite an absolute, seeing as how you've got the parts for it. I just assumed you have a severe problem with the very fact that they're men. I mean, there are some VERY effiminate men, who basically have women's personalities. No other factor is left for you to object to except for the mere FACT that they are designated "men". Because, with the extreme variety of "men" that exist, I find it impossible to believe you couldn't halfway enjoy even one!

Ragtime has now spoken. Thank you.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 6:06 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
I guess Ragtime didn't answer becuase he realised he screwed up?

Well if he did I saved his bacon.

How? By saying I was looking for attention? lol
I posted it so many times because I wanted an explanation and I didn't want him to be able to just get away with not responding.


I generally try to avoid responding to silly questions, but alas, am usually unsuccessful at restraining myself. I find it interesting that my accusation touched such a nerve with you (which is a rare thing for you -- you're usually pretty laid-back and/or cocky). So I wanted to see how long you'd squirm about it. You see, I never said you SAID you hated men. I simply stated what must be likely be true at least on some level, if you truly can NEVER, EVER, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, do a man. I mean, come on, that's quite an absolute, seeing as how you've got the parts for it. I just assumed you have a severe problem with the very fact that they're men. I mean, there are some VERY effiminate men, who basically have women's personalities. No other factor is left for you to object to except for the mere FACT that they are designated "men". Because, with the extreme variety of "men" that exist, I find it impossible to believe you couldn't halfway enjoy even one!

You could say that to any straight man as well. You suggested that I hate half the population. It didn't 'touch a nerve' with me, I just found it irritating. I genuinely want to know if I come across as if I hate half the population simply for having a penis. Why is it so hard for you to understand that I'm just not attracted to men in the same way that straight men aren't. I would have sex with a man under some circumstances: possibly if someone held a gun to my head, if I had to choose between that and the life of some kid somewhere etc. etc. But I've never been attracted to a guy before, even when I tried for several years, therefore it's unlikely I ever will now. So I can safely say I probably never will have sex with a man. What's wrong with that? I don't like the idea of someone I only like as a friend sticking their penis inside me. I'm sure you don't either.
And what I asked was not a silly question. You were saying I hate men, I asked why. If anything was silly, it was what you said.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

10 Aug 2007, 6:07 pm

Hadron wrote:
Ragtime has now spoken. Thank you.

Finally.



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

10 Aug 2007, 6:08 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i sincerely doubt you'd walk away if i were infront of you on my knees

Then you misjudge me. I am quite the stoic.


im quazi afk cooking for my family...

but i believe this is the edited response to my post regarding your inuendoes you make from time to time about me...


i pmed you a response (cause i read it before you changed it) and dont really care to hear anything back from you...



but i am done. whatever we disagree on in threads and call each other names... i do so cause i thought we at least had some sort of respect for eachother on a different level

and to think the times i do come to your defense... amidst our in-thread arguments

but i see that you really dont care what lines you cross or whether you really do offend people on a very personal level (and im not talking about our bantar)


we'll still have our knitty gritty debates... but if you somehow get the feeling they're a bit colder

it's because they are


so as i left it in the pm

gl take care

good bye



and i really dont appreciate that you change your response to this lame smartass remark that is so one-dimesnional of you... you shoulda left the other response


apologies in advance if im just overlooking the real response due to lag

time to get back to chores

80 pgs or bust!


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

10 Aug 2007, 6:14 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i sincerely doubt you'd walk away if i were infront of you on my knees

Then you misjudge me. I am quite the stoic.


'Tis hard to turn down a supplicant,
however.