funeralxempire wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
If white people had "privilege", no one would be allowed to criticise them and get away with it. Instead, it's all we hear. "Angry white men" blamed for Trump's victory, as well as white Russians. White people in the south of the US are made fun of and made to look like inbred simpletons in films. "White trash" is a socially acceptable term. You replace "white" with some other groups and you're done.
I guess if you insist on redefining white privilege you might have a point. Unfortunately it's not one that actually addresses what the concept refers to.
Feel free to read this so you can actually make arguments that respond to the concept of white privilege instead of just sounding triggered:
http://code.ucsd.edu/pcosman/Backpack.pdf "The problem is that you simply don't understand that the phrase "white privilege" refers to a grand conspiracy theory in which all white people are purposefully conditioned to be oppressive and racist towards non-whites whilst also deliberately conditioned not to know that they're doing it.""White privilege" as a concept predates McIntosh and, no matter how much obfuscatory academic language anyone may try to envelop the term in, it remains a value judgement based solely on an immutable characteristic and typically manifests as such. McIntosh's "list" was a personal anecdote. She claimed to have never been asked to speak on behalf of her "race", yet presumed to speak on behalf of all white people. The kafkaesque suggestion that those white persons who disagreed with her were proof of the legitimacy of her hypothesis is an irony which I hope will not be lost on you.
The more egregious uses of "white privilege" include it's application as a litmus test or as a pseudo-religious rite of passage in which one is deemed to be unworthy or impure unless one has confessed one's original sin of being born a wrongskin - see "Weatherman" or "The Weathermen" or, indeed, check out some of the 'Progressive' groups on any campus.