Socialite Monkey Wana-B Diagnosticians

Post Reply New Topic

Socialite Monkey Wana-B Diagnosticians

1. Unethical practice of diagnostics criterion, instead of the student open minded study and thought exchanges.

2. Assert authority in what he or she believes of his or her unqualified knowledge without question, sometimes abusing psychology to manipulate others.

3. Makes free expressions and ideas including thought styles of natural mind ability, such as extreme visual spatula ability found in gifted similaritiarians insain. Ahh Noodles and sauce!

4. Uses psychology to assert narcissistic views of self superiority of educational status and knowing, to protect his or her nerotic knowings to protect intellectual ego and status.

5. Events criterion, and or manipulates the criterion of qualified individuals to fit a situation directly, instead of speaking situational indirectly, usually in an attempt to create fictions of character of another.


Who let the dogs out, who who who.

The differences between the genuin persuit of intelectual growth in the attempt in socializations and that of the prick, the willingness to learn from one another and genuin tolerance of others. Instead making burden to the experience in general.

Nathan
- In Victory

whooo yaaa

so, sc, what are you getting at? Is this an effort to create debate or are you finger pointing? (please note that I am being polite, not "flaming")

Sounds like me, but i'd LIKE to believe that I have a genuine desire to learn. And perhaps I am lying to myself when i buy hundreds of dollars of college books(of classes i'm not taking) just because i'm curious about it(and want it written in textbook form). And when I write all my questions down and ask the instructor in private after class so i dont look like a know-it-all-whore in class that I engage in that whole ritual just to convince myself I have genuine interest in learning that i dont have. Scares me really. But that does sound awfully like me. He might not be talking about me specifically, but it sounds like i'm one of em.

Am i one of em? Cause I probably am narcissistic and I DO rationalize all that crap using psychology. But i'd like to think that despite my high opinion of myself I am willing to be open minded about s**t. If i manipulate people through psychology, i'm sorry about that, i wasn't intending that.

No was referring to someone who said to me directly some things, he has not really talked to me since, thankfully.

I read textbooks only, However I do not retain all the information, new thought processes and dissecting intellectually things people don't typically spend time on is what I do (perhaps other intelectualites). Other then textbooks I have Jung books, but with any of these things I'll take a few pages and spend a few hours on it. Classes can, but not all go to fast or to slow, independently learning makes you a better learned monkey.

Freedom can be contradictive, like the universe and its illogicalities in origins theoretically. The mind though, for sure originating in our heads from first thought and can think as it pleases.

It would be nice to find constructive conversations of a limited nature or be able to sit in on philosophy, psychology and sociology classes. I have no delusion of intellectual superiority nor inferiority, rather an independent thought style.

--------------------------

More so, if you were called schizophrenic for being of religion directly, then it would be abuse of psychology. Such as I have seen on Atheists websites. However logically not all atheist (which I am not) cannot be judged of that act, nor can an individual of religion due to the acts of others of religion.

As long as it's not done on purpose, it should not bother anyone, if it does then say so. Other then that I think that social conflicts of psychobabble insults is enough.

All information I consume is placed into a box titled, "Under Consideration." And then it never ever leaves. The christian god being the one true god is in there somewhere, as well as evolution is the origin of all life, and god is the origin of all life. All are under consideration. I don't like to discount anything, because even if it isnt entirely true it may be applicable to something i come across in life. I operate from moment to moment on the items under consideration which seem safest and most relevant to reality. I got like a dozen if not more different approachs to understanding Freud in my box and his theories because i've heard many teachers opinions and perspectives toward Freud, as well as other peoples opinions and perspectives(TV, books, movies, ect.)

I used to like writing original s**t, and thinking up original ideas(And infact i have plenty of ones i plan to write on in my life) but i got sick of my dad telling me that someone already thought up that stuff.

Today I will have to be gone until the evening, to many things that are disorganized in my surroundings, time to clean.

Freud, the rival of Jung, which is sort of funny because Jung I believe had gone insane at one point, I think I remember him questioning his sanity in a book, yet it is human to experience delusions whether it be a complex of them or not.

Freud has been argued against I've been told and proven wrong. He seems very blunt and likely too direct for most. I read his books I have them as well, they are considered text books, but are old school. I think or try to think with concern to both Jung and Freud, as their influence was so great.

Typically, just in my experience, Jung is preferred by those who have the complex of delusion. Namely my old doctor who he himself believed people could leave their bodies. Yes some doctors are nuts.

I'm fascinated in how the individual believes, then I cannot help myself from spending great lengths of time figuring people out. I am only interested in certain subjects for certain reasons, however the more I read the more it becomes part of my mind, the more situations I can think through intellectually, yet the totality of situations are not always of genuin knowledge.

Theoretics and facts do not always match and opinion and ideas at times believed over that that of the critical thought analysis’s determination in society.