pgd wrote:
In my view, the message the Obama White House is sending is to look like Barbie and Ken dolls from Hollywood. ... eliminate fat children [ so as ] to perhaps roll back time to an era when new recruits for the armed forces were deemed to be healthier than today.
I wonder whether it might have something to do with "control". Fatness is seen as lack of control, ( always has been to some extent but the association has become increasingly powerful in the last four decades or so since people started "struggling" with fat, attempting to lose weight, etc ), and perhaps the Administration/govts see "fat"/fat people as a sign of, and easy scapegoat for, what they perceive as a nationwide "loss of control", over a lot of things.
Fatness may be acting as a symbol for "that which can not control", which might go someway towards explaining why attempts to deal with it have been so stunningly inept, govt campaigns so ill-informed, etc such that the population earnestly following govt advice, ( to eat more complex carbos and less fat ... ha!
), etc has actually ended up fatter than ever before. ... If fat/fatness is acting as a symbol for "that which can not control" then it cannot disappear.
I was leaning towards the theory that fat/fatness represents the sexless but feminine maternal, which our society provides so little space for ... but the fact that one of the most hostile reactions that many fat people get is that they are unable to control themselves, that they must be "weak", undisciplined, self-indulgent, etc does suggest that fat may be functioning as a scapegoat for widespread anxiety about ( an apparently increasing ) loss of control. Which is interesting.
:lol
.