Separation of Church and State
This is what irritates me about the Religious Right - they're always going on about how prayer in school is "illegal". Only school-led prayer is illegal, but students are perfectly free to pray on their own as long as they do so in a non-disruptive manner.
I know of many schools that have a "See You At The Pole" event organized by Christian students, and it's perfectly legal as long as participation is voluntary and not compulsory. Yet I'm always hearing stories about how religious conservative parents protest schools allowing Gay-Straight Alliance clubs to form, or allowing students to form a "Day of Silence" event. If they expect us to tolerate their students organizing Christian-related clubs and events, then they should expect to show some tolerance for non-Christians/LGBT students and their right to form clubs/events for their respective interests.
I know of many schools that have a "See You At The Pole" event organized by Christian students, and it's perfectly legal as long as participation is voluntary and not compulsory. Yet I'm always hearing stories about how religious conservative parents protest schools allowing Gay-Straight Alliance clubs to form, or allowing students to form a "Day of Silence" event. If they expect us to tolerate their students organizing Christian-related clubs and events, then they should expect to show some tolerance for non-Christians/LGBT students and their right to form clubs/events for their respective interests.
But it's precisely because they are Christian that they are so intolerant.
I will tell you this just once - since if you have a smidge of intellectual honesty you know it anyway.
I have known MANY intolerant people who were not Christian, many who were not of anything we might call a religion, many who were atheist and, yes, antitheist. Should you doubt, you may check out my brother.
I have known MANY tolerant people who were Christian, not a few of other religions, as well as some irreligious and atheist [though I have not knowingly met an antitheist tolerant toward religion, for logical reasons].
An intolerance programmed person will be so wherever he is and whatever he aligns himself with.
A tolerance inclined person likewise.
You may, if you wish, maintain that an intolerant Christian would doubt the Christian standing of a tolerant Christian - that happens.
But if you have truly never met a tolerant CXhristian, you must rarely have left the house. Maybe you just never recognized them? Or they never mentioned they were Christian?
leejosepho
Veteran

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
Tolerance is not really the issue here. The issue here is sloth: Parents not doing their jobs. They send their children to government schools as a convenience for themselves ... and then they dare to complain about the environment there or about how someone else does that.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
Having both homeschooled and outsourced Number One Son, having been publicly and privately schooled, may I say:
outsourcing your child's education is not in all cases a convenience
in some places the barriers raised against homeschooling are too high for some parents
even with scholarship help, private school is out of reach for many, even if a good option exists in the vicinity
As for the public schools - teaching at the U I had to deal with the output. LOTS of remedial work installing stuff that in my day in some cases was grade school, not high school.
leejosepho
Veteran

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
in some places the barriers raised against homeschooling are too high for some parents
Understood, and I spoke too broadly as to sloth. Nevertheless, parents who send their children to government schools and then complain ... well, they at least need some education for themselves: There is no point.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
It's all a certain group of people who want to enforce their will upon everyone elses. It's not so much doing the right thing for their children, but pushing their beliefs upon everyone else.
If you want to pray in school, fine. However, if you don't want to pray in school - you shouldn't have to. Those that do can keep to themselves and do their thing, while not being a distraction or trying to push their beliefs upon others.
I have known MANY intolerant people who were not Christian, many who were not of anything we might call a religion, many who were atheist and, yes, antitheist. Should you doubt, you may check out my brother.
I have known MANY tolerant people who were Christian, not a few of other religions, as well as some irreligious and atheist [though I have not knowingly met an antitheist tolerant toward religion, for logical reasons].
An intolerance programmed person will be so wherever he is and whatever he aligns himself with.
A tolerance inclined person likewise.
You may, if you wish, maintain that an intolerant Christian would doubt the Christian standing of a tolerant Christian - that happens.
But if you have truly never met a tolerant CXhristian, you must rarely have left the house. Maybe you just never recognized them? Or they never mentioned they were Christian?
Of course there are tolerant Christians. I never said all Christians are intolerant. But those who adhere to the Bible which directs them to be intolerant to gay people and believers in other gods are intolerant because they are following Christian directions to be intolerant. Some Christians permit their decent feelings to over ride the Biblical directions and therefore ignore the Biblical directives.
This position is silly. The Bible does not say being Gay is wrong, it says sodomy is wrong. Nor does it entitle one to hate someone for the committing of a prohibited act. It states that people should follow the ways of Jesus and that the only certain way into heaven is to follow his example, but it does not allow the hatred of people from other religions. In fact it encourages one to love their enemies. Good tolerant Christians are the ones that follow the teachings of Christ not the ones that ignore them.
The only people who would find your argument persuasive sand are those who are already prejudice against religious people.
_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.
This position is silly. The Bible does not say being Gay is wrong, it says sodomy is wrong. Nor does it entitle one to hate someone for the committing of a prohibited act. It states that people should follow the ways of Jesus and that the only certain way into heaven is to follow his example, but it does not allow the hatred of people from other religions. In fact it encourages one to love their enemies. Good tolerant Christians are the ones that follow the teachings of Christ not the ones that ignore them.
The only people who would find your argument persuasive sand are those who are already prejudice against religious people.
One of the ten commandments clearly states "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" Obviously other religions violate that. And to claim gay people are not discriminated against out of Christianity is to be about as unaware of world events as it is possible to be. Gay sex cannot exist without sodomy so denial of gay freedom is an inherent part of Christianity. Your statements are incredibly obtuse.
Yes it does say that; but it does not say 'thou shalt hate people who worship other Gods'. I also do not doubt that some Christians discriminate against people who are Gay, they cannot claim a Biblical licence for this though. It does indeed prohibit Sodomy in the book of Leviticus a Christian would not be entitled to hate that person though. I personally do not think that sodomy is moral but I have no Biblical grounds for insisting that people should not be legally allowed to commit that sin, considering much of the law in the Old Testament that talks about Sodomy, discusses it in relation to ritual law not state law.
The problem I have, is that if one wants to one will find groundings for their prejudices. It cannot be that this is simply a religious issue; since it have proven time and again that atheists can also be prejudice.
_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.
Yes it does say that; but it does not say 'thou shalt hate people who worship other Gods'. I also do not doubt that some Christians discriminate against people who are Gay, they cannot claim a Biblical licence for this though. It does indeed prohibit Sodomy in the book of Leviticus a Christian would not be entitled to hate that person though. I personally do not think that sodomy is moral but I have no Biblical grounds for insisting that people should not be legally allowed to commit that sin, considering much of the law in the Old Testament that talks about Sodomy, discusses it in relation to ritual law not state law.
The problem I have, is that if one wants to one will find groundings for their prejudices. It cannot be that this is simply a religious issue; since it have proven time and again that atheists can also be prejudice.
Much of Christian persecution is derived from the passages I have indicated. Of course there are many Christians who, like yourself, are not self righteous about their beliefs but it cannot be denied that there is huge disdain and sometimes terrible events derived from the dogmatic readings out of Christianity. Vicious people have tortured and killed people for their personal beliefs and sexual orientation and I see no way to condone that.
The perennial declarations that somehow bad behavior is excused by bad behavior from other quarters is, if nothing else, logically absurd.
Sand: A
But it's precisely because they are Christian that they are so intolerant.
Sand: B
Of course there are tolerant Christians. I never said all Christians are intolerant.
A true and consistent Emersonian, Sand is.
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day."
leejosepho
Veteran

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
Those are the kind I view as slothful, but some might just be delusional concerning authority in the matter.
I fall way short of knowing all the details here, but I believe schooling in the States began at the local level and with no government involvement or oversight, and "the Bible" was used primarily as a reader for all amidst common-law people who largely embraced it anyway ... and now people get married by entering into a contract with the state and produce children -- "products" -- subject to state control and then complain because things are done differently there.
Nowhere in Scripture is anyone told to force anything upon non-believers, and followers *are* told to come out from among them and to attend their own responsibilities.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
[quote="Philologos"]Sand: A
But it's precisely because they are Christian that they are so intolerant.
Sand: B
Of course there are tolerant Christians. I never said all Christians are intolerant.
A true and consistent Emersonian, Sand is.
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day."[/quote
My statements were not at all inconsistent. They do require a bit of thought which may be difficult for some.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Brian James of The Dammed and Lords of The New Church R.I.P. |
14 Mar 2025, 8:57 pm |
Black Church gains control of Proud Boys trademark |
05 Feb 2025, 5:51 pm |