Jacoby wrote:
I thought of Waterworld when I saw this thread, the answer to that would of been an emphatic no.
Waterworld... oh jeez, I'm sorry my thread made that invade your mind even if temporarily
Oodain wrote:
as i understand it its being used as an ultra secure serverpark at the moment.
only the 5 or so residentys and technicians are allowed out there.
other than that i think anyone has a right to start a country if no one else has laid claim to that particular plot of land (originally sealand was bhought from the british government as far as i know)
Yeah its an interesting concept, the "micro-nation". There are others in the world as well. Concepts such as "Sea-Steading"
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Seasteading could lead to further growth in this little part of the Human race. As server parks or data centers offshore they can be used to circumvent certain laws of censorship and observation. Unfortunately that can aid some of the wrong people too...
Tequila wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Since these ding-a-lings occupy an otherwise desired spit a land
It's an old RAF tower built in the sea. It's not a proper nation - it has no land - and no country recognises it.
I'm sure the local armed boat police could easily put a stop to their existence if they wanted to.
There is no
de jure recognition but there has been limited contact which leads some to say it is
de facto. But is a nation just real estate or is it people?
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do