McJeff wrote:
While I deeply sympathize with the plight of the Lebanese citizens, I find it necessary to mention that Hezbollah brought this conflict on when they disregarded Israel's sovreignity and ambushed a guard station during a time of declared peace, kidnapping two soldiers and executing the rest.
Israel is fully within its rights to do these things.
This destruction rests soley on the hands of those who will not return the captured Israelis.
That statement is so contradictory. If you think Israel is fully within its rights to do these things, then you can not possibly "deeply sympathize" with the plight of the Lebanese citizens.
These are actions that have to do with the creation of "nation" states. Israel, like the United States, doesn't care about the Geneva convention, nor do they care about the innocent lives they slaughter in the name of freedom any more than the terrorists they so claim to be fighting against. Israel is in the position of strategic domination of the Middle East, and are provided with funds and weapons from the United States to do so. If the United States attempted to do anything about conflicts in the Middle East, it would prosecute Sharon for war crimes and halt any further shipments of weapons of warfare, including bulldozers and other tractor equipment knowingly sold by Caterpillar. This would have much more of an impact than waging war with a third-world, primarily defenseless country like Iraq. It might anger people who, for reasons of bigotry, support the nation state of Israel, but then again, nationalism is a global disgrace.
- Ray M -