Scott_R92 wrote:
Absolutely none of that is proof. It is completely opinion driven, and provides no tangible evidence to the lack of existence of a supreme being. Given there is no evidence for or against such an idea, everyone is able to part ways with their belief.
how could there be tangible evidence to the lack of a supreme being?
i can understand tangible evidence to support the idea of a supreme being...but tangible evidence to the lack thereof? is that like following instructions in holy books and then observing that there is no divine intervention?
anyways, i think bill hicks is more likely to be right with his views on the issue than christians, muslims, jews, mandeans, wiccans, scientologists*....well you get the point.
*one of the most pitiful groups of mental midgets, by far.