AceOfSpades wrote:
I'm not sure whether a God exists or not, but I won't believe in a God that would punish people. God is the creator and has no reason to punish people when God understands people most.
For example, a mother may get p***ed off at her child for not getting good grades, but the mother doesn't understand how the child feels. The child may feel very overwhelmed by work and gives in to computer addiction.
The mother thinks that the child doesn't care about his/her grades, but in reality, the child may feel weak for being addicted to the computer and finding work overwhelming. As a result, the mother punishes the child by taking the monitor away.
The mother doesn't understand how the child feels and the child doesn't understand why the mother doesn't understand him/her. The reason the child is getting punished is due to the mother's lack of understanding. God however, understands both people and know a lot more about them than anyone living on the earth.
This is why I refuse to believe in a God that punishes people.
As for why a God would let people get cancer: The answer is beyond our limited knowledge and imagination. Maybe God is a creator and not a modifier?
Actually, there is a hole in your argument.
So you are saying that the child is not lazy, but as a result of his mom not knowing his thoughts, she thought he was just lazy. Okay this scenario is possible. But there is ANOTHER scenario that is also possible. What if the child IS lazy, AND his mom is telepathic. In this case she will think that he is lazy DESPITE being delepathic, because this will indeed be true. In other words, you seem to assume that no one in the planet is lazy, or bad in any other way. This assumption is needed in order to make a claim that the ONLY way to think of someone as bad is to misunderstand them.
And by the way, look at yourself. You don't have a perfect knowledge of other people. Yet, you were able to make such claim DESPITE your lack of knowledge. So, following your logic, it might be possible for the mom of a child to make similar inference that you did, and to say that IF she knew all about the child she won't be punishing him. Then, she would go to logical conclusion that she shouldn't punish him, period. After all why punish someone else for her own lack of knowledge?