Coalition Forces Have Upper Hand in Iraq

Post Reply New Topic

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/15/D8I8LJBG0.html

Let's see how our good little lib friends spin this one.

DANCE, MONKEYS! DANCE!

Mad Lib 1 enters room. Everything quiet as he prepares to speak. Mad Lib 1 starts laughing hysterically.
Mad Lib 1:This is a joke, right? There is not an organized resistance. I'm well aware of that. This is horribly unorganized among people that hate us. Maybe they hate us for the wrong reasons. Maybe it's for the right reasons. I haven't been and do not know. But they do hate us, and they want us out. As such, we can't be happy over a single death. There is already a new "leader" taking his place. He shall act as a nice figurehead, claim responsibility, and generally be a nice face. I personally believe that the US employs these people to put a face on things and then kills them when approval is low. In conclusion, we need to get out of Iraq, things are getting worse and cannot be repaired, and we honestly don't have any business there anyhow. We aren't rebuilding, we're destroying. Or they're destroying. Put it however you want, things are getting torn down faster than they're getting put up.

If we pull out now, things will get worse for us. We cannot back down to the insurgents who are attacking our troops.
But by all means,keep dancing monkey!

Compliments of subatai_baadur, we've got the "Bury your head in the sand, ignore the reality of the situation in Iraq and claim we're losing even though it's been proven time and time again that we're winning" strategy.

Who's next? Entertain me. The liberal who comes up with the most amusing reason as to why Iraq isn't becoming a bigger success by the day, gets a dog biscuit.

Mad Lib 1 reenters. He is hopelessly outnumbered by several dumber creatures known to dwell in dark places and only come out to attack when accompanied by a Hummer. Suddenly, he steps onto a large rock and prepares his defense. He starts to speak as the slow witted Bush creatures react far too slowly yet again. Their reflexes have been shown to be inhibited for some time since the great flood hit a large amount of their constituancy. He begins to speak.
Mad Lib 1: They are attacking us because we are there. They do not attack us here. If you want to hit them where they are, I don't mind. Go to Pakistan. Go to Saudi Arabia, where most of the 9/11 attackers were from. But you are using the troops as a deflectors so that they don't hit us here. 2500 soldiers dead does not equal progress. You are creating terrorists there by pissing them off. Nothing is going well. We cannot occupy a country that is bombing the troops. They don't really even deserve democracy. Latest polls indicate that most Iraqis want to attack us. If you want my strategy, here it is. We divide the country in 3. Shi'ites get one part, Sunnis get another, Kurds get the third. We then let the UN take over. If the UN ****s it up, then it's on them. But we need to get out of there and focus on those countries that now have missiles capable of hitting our bear and moose country, or the country that is growing nuclear capabilities. But Iraq is going worse, not better.
Mad Lib 1 closes his statement. He prepares for an onslaught as he sees several figures in the distance. Could they be people who agree with him? Well, could they?

It has never been a case of a gauge you can pull out of a mystical box and say whether you are winning or losing the battle against resistance in Iraq. When does the occupation of a foriegn country and the complete annihilation of resistance ever happen within history? Especially where the occupying power has no concept or understanding of Arabic people and culture. I tell you who the Yanks really need right now is to ressurect Moshe Dayan from the grave cause he by far understood the Arabic culture better then any americain general every will.

All Bush-haters want America to fail utterly in Iraq. They're so blinded by their hatred of one man that they've lost all rationality when it comes to things involving politics in general and Iraq in particular.

I wish I could respond to that with a characteristically flip remark, but alas.

What if I told you all that one of the primary reasons I went from being a Bush supporter to a disenfranchised moderate, was because Bush refused to hold Rumsfeld responsible for his criminally neglegent (when not outright criminal) handling of the Iraq war?

I'm not a liberal or a conservative, if I offend someone oh well, all you people are doing is sincelessly bashing anyhow. And it's pathetic when everyone slaps a label on themselves and goes the extra mile to defend their label to the death and act like they are incapable of doing any wrong, totally by-passing or denying any obvious facts that are clearly out of place. This is especially true of conservatives.
However I'm not a supporter of libs either, they lack the balls to run the country and are too afraid of being called "politically incorrect". Take illegal immigration for an example, of how libs have no balls. Most hard-line libs will claim if you don't support illegal immigration that hurts our economy and is destroying social security, but if you don't support it your a "racist" against mexicans. I could give a rats @$$ what color they are, and in all honesty I don't even blame the mexicans seeing as they are migrating out of poverty and hunger. I do, however, think it is the government's job to effectively handle the situation, but I don't think militarizing our borders is the way to do it. This is very possibly another piece of the puzzle in a police state set-up, not to keep people out, but to keep people IN. And McJeff, you have you conservatives have your head so far up your @$$ if Fox News said the sky is green you'd swear on your grandparent's graves that the sky is green. What more evidence do you need, read a history book, watch the news, and ad up the facts. It's this simple.
Though I do not think Bush will succeed in setting up a police state. He only furthered it by a long mile. However he is pushing to get his brother Jeb in the race, perhaps to finnish his work?
Point blank I think blinding following a label and angelicizing a label JUST BECAUSE **YOU** HAPPEN TO FOLLOW IT IS STUPID. That goes equal for libs.