Obama vs. Ryan's plan to Reduce Federal Debt
A one page analysis of differences per quote from this article:
Report from the Deficit commision is also included.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/04/how-the-white-house-deficit-reduction-plan-compares/237271/
White House: Find $4 trillion in savings in "12 years or less."
Paul Ryan: Find $4 trillion in savings by 2022
Deficit Commission: Find $4 trillion in savings by 2020.
Spending Cuts
White House: Save $750 billion in domestic spending over 12 years. Review military spending for further savings. Maintain or increase spending in medical research, clean energy technology, roads, airports, broadband access, education, and job training.
Paul Ryan: Bring non-security discretionary spending to below 2008 levels, resulting in a 33 percent cut in non-security discretionary spending in 2020 below the baseline. Reduce inefficient defense spending by $178 billion but reinvest $100 billion to achieve savings of $78 billion.
Deficit Commission: Cut $100 billion from defense and $100 billion from non-defense spending by 2015 by taking total spending down to 2008 levels over two years, and then limit growth to half the rate of inflation. Put special limits on war spending.
Tax Reform
White House: Let the Bush tax cuts expire for "the wealthy," which will save more than $700 billion over ten years. Limit itemized deductions for the wealthiest 2% of Americans to reduce the deficit by an additional $320 billion over ten years. Convene a panel on tax reform. (Another part of the speech calls for "tax reform to cut about $1 trillion in spending from the tax code")
Paul Ryan: Extend the Bush tax cuts and enact tax reform. Repeal $800 billion in tax increases imposed by Affordable Care Act. Enact simpler, less burdensome tax code for households and small businesses. Consolidate and lowers tax rates for individuals so that the top rate comes down from 35 to 25 percent and pay for it by sweeping out deductions and exemptions. Lower corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent and pay for it by sweeping out tax expenditures.
Deficit Commission: Enact comprehensive tax reform. Consolidate and lower individual income rates to 12%, 22%, and 28%. Eliminate most tax expenditures that don't protect the low-income. Tax capital gains and dividends as normal income. Lower corporate income rate to 28%, eliminate most deductions, and move to a territorial tax system, which would not tax profits made by U.S. multinationals overseas.
Health Care Reforms
White House: Keep the Affordable Care Act. Find $500 billion in additional savings by reducing waste, using Medicare's purchasing power to drive down prices, and work with governors to keep down Medicaid costs. Strengthen the independent Medicare advisory board to control costs in Medcare.
Paul Ryan: Repeal the Affordable Care Act. Starting in 2022, convert Medicare into a voucher program where the size of the voucher is sensitive to the senior's income and grows slower than health care inflation. Establish a medical savings account for low income beneficiaries. Convert Medicaid cost-sharing into block grants that increase according to population growth and inflation.
Deficit Commission: Keep most of the Affordable Care Act. Strengthen the independent Medicare advisory board. Reform the "doc fix" and pay for it by increasing cost sharing in Medicare. Establish a long-term budget for total health care spending that limits health care cost growth to GDP+1%.
Social Security Changes
White House: Unspecified changes: "both parties should work together now to strengthen Social Security for future generations."
Paul Ryan: Unspecified changes.
Deficit Commission: On benefits side: shrink Social Security checks by changing the benefits formula; slowly raise the retirement age to 69 by 2075; refine the cost-of-living measure used to increase Social Security checks every year. On the revenue side: raise the "ceiling" of taxable income to 90 percent of earnings; create higher minimum and old-age benefits.
Difference is, I believe Paul Ryan is serious about cutting spending, I do not believe Obama.
Obama is pushing for class warfare and tax increases, our economy is already struggling, Obama wants to hike taxes on small business owners making their struggle to stay in business even more difficult.
Obama's plan looks like income redistribution and more of the same.
Obama is pushing for class warfare and tax increases, our economy is already struggling, Obama wants to hike taxes on small business owners making their struggle to stay in business even more difficult.
Obama's plan looks like income redistribution and more of the same.
What do you think about the recommendations of the Deficit commision?
Obama is pushing for class warfare and tax increases, our economy is already struggling, Obama wants to hike taxes on small business owners making their struggle to stay in business even more difficult.
Obama's plan looks like income redistribution and more of the same.
What do you think about the recommendations of the Deficit commision?
Obamacare (barring a judge suddenly retires or dies) is likely to be ruled Unconstitutional in the US Supreme Court. Also the limiting wartime expenditures by military is kinda idiotic.
Obamacare (barring a judge suddenly retires or dies) is likely to be ruled Unconstitutional in the US Supreme Court. Also the limiting wartime expenditures by military is kinda idiotic.
Our military has being doing warfare retail, when it should be doing it whoesale. If we had dumped our nukes on the Middle East back in 2001, do you think we would be having this trouble now?
How did we win WW2 in the Pacific? By nuking our enemy. The lesson is very clear. If you have nuclear weapons, then use them.
ruveyn
Last edited by ruveyn on 13 Apr 2011, 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Obama is pushing for class warfare and tax increases, our economy is already struggling, Obama wants to hike taxes on small business owners making their struggle to stay in business even more difficult.
Obama's plan looks like income redistribution and more of the same.
What do you think about the recommendations of the Deficit commision?
Obamacare (barring a judge suddenly retires or dies) is likely to be ruled Unconstitutional in the US Supreme Court. Also the limiting wartime expenditures by military is kinda idiotic.
Is Ryan's plan completely acceptable, or do you see any need for modification?
Obamacare (barring a judge suddenly retires or dies) is likely to be ruled Unconstitutional in the US Supreme Court. Also the limiting wartime expenditures by military is kinda idiotic.
Our military has being doing warfare retail, when it should be doing it retail. If we had dumped our nukes on the Middle East back in 2001, do you think we would be having this trouble now?
How did we win WW2 in the Pacific? By nuking our enemy. The lesson is very clear. If you have nuclear weapons, then use them.
ruveyn
Would their be a legitimate concern over nuclear fallout to the neighboring countries considered our allies?
Obamacare (barring a judge suddenly retires or dies) is likely to be ruled Unconstitutional in the US Supreme Court. Also the limiting wartime expenditures by military is kinda idiotic.
Our military has being doing warfare retail, when it should be doing it retail. If we had dumped our nukes on the Middle East back in 2001, do you think we would be having this trouble now?
How did we win WW2 in the Pacific? By nuking our enemy. The lesson is very clear. If you have nuclear weapons, then use them.
ruveyn
Would their be a legitimate concern over nuclear fallout to the neighboring countries considered our allies?
In a real war collateral damage is inevitable.
Over one million civillians were killed in WW2 on the enemy side. C'est dommage. War is a b***h. In a war people are killed and their sh*t is all busted up.
ruveyn
Nukes are genocidal weapons that cause damage to uninvolved countries. Bad idea ruveyn. You drop enough nukes, even the weather in New Jersey is going to be affected
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Obamacare (barring a judge suddenly retires or dies) is likely to be ruled Unconstitutional in the US Supreme Court. Also the limiting wartime expenditures by military is kinda idiotic.
Our military has being doing warfare retail, when it should be doing it retail. If we had dumped our nukes on the Middle East back in 2001, do you think we would be having this trouble now?
How did we win WW2 in the Pacific? By nuking our enemy. The lesson is very clear. If you have nuclear weapons, then use them.
ruveyn
Would their be a legitimate concern over nuclear fallout to the neighboring countries considered our allies?
In a real war collateral damage is inevitable.
Over one million civillians were killed in WW2 on the enemy side. C'est dommage. War is a b***h. In a war people are killed and their sh*t is all busted up.
ruveyn
We were attacked by extremist terrorists that were largely of Saudi origin. Which middle east countries, could we have bombed with nukes to lessen the threat for another terrorist attack on our soil?
And, is a real war of any kind a solution to fight extremist terrorists. How do you kill an ideology?
In my opinion a nuclear attack by the US on a Middle east country would exponentiate the threat of terrorist attacks on our Country. Extremist terrorists are everywhere, even in our country. Do you think a nuclear attack would scare terrorists, willing to die for their cause, like they did on 9/11? Or would it make it more likely that we would be attacked again on our soil?
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
The deficit commission's recommendations are pretty good too. Notably they follow Ryan's approach of cutting the top income tax rate. Obama should get a clue from the fact that his own experts recommend that.
With Obama refusing to back the commission, though, their proposal has no political support and is dead on the vine.
And, is a real war of any kind a solution to fight extremist terrorists. How do you kill an ideology?
?
By killing everyone who holds that ideology. next question?
It is not easy, but it is possible. The only question is: is the cost worth it?
ruveyn
In an attempt to try to understand the strategy on the otherside of the fence, judging from the fact that we have had no more serious attacks on our soil; I'm thinking the strategy there was to knock one domino over and wait to see how many more fall.
Hopefully both sides will come to some kind of serious agreement on reducing the budget deficit to stop the dominoes from falling.
Killing those responsible by starting two conventional wars, was our attempt to kill the ideology; one could say we've been successful, with no more attacks on our soil, but one could also ask were we really successful, or did we do exactly what they expected?
The deficit commission's recommendations are pretty good too. Notably they follow Ryan's approach of cutting the top income tax rate. Obama should get a clue from the fact that his own experts recommend that.
With Obama refusing to back the commission, though, their proposal has no political support and is dead on the vine.
At this point reducing the debt by four trillion dollars, over a span of approximately ten years, seems to be the main goal shared by the three plans. I could see the goal posts moving closer to what the commission recommends. Neither the Ryan plan or the Obama plan have a chance of passing as is.
I think the battle to pass something is going to be as hard fought as the passage of healthcare reform. But at least, it is understood by both sides, that something has to be done now.
We should be able to do better than four trillion dollars over ten years; and could with effective tax reform and spending cuts.
While the commision recommends the consolidation and lowering of three tax brackets, the other measures within that plan get rid of loopholes, that in effect, significantly raise taxes for those that take advantage of the loopholes.
The biggest battle will probably be over letting the tax cuts expire for the top tax bracket. This along with a one percent rise for the other tax brackets could generate much more revenue, and perhaps be seen as evidence that the rich aren't the only ones making a sacrifice.
One percent for a married couple making $60,000 a year is about $15 deducted from bi-weekly paychecks. And, about $85 dollars deducted from bi-weekly paychecks for a married couple that makes $249,000 a year.
Add in dependents and it is a little less. It really isn't that much of a sacrifice, if it could be seen as the patriotic thing to do.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
federal judge temporarily blocks plan to pause federal aid |
28 Jan 2025, 7:02 pm |
oh no, breaking federal laws like we did with weed. |
11 Dec 2024, 12:40 am |
Federal judge blocks Louisiana's Ten Commandments law |
12 Nov 2024, 8:31 pm |
Federal rules on ABA hours and technician qualifications |
08 Jan 2025, 10:53 am |