Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 

Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

27 Jul 2011, 11:48 am

A. An oldy but goody:

" There is a story of an old-fashioned minister who preached a sermon against women "doing up" their hair, taking as his text, "Topknot come down." When one of his hearers indignantly insisted that there was no such text in the Bible, the defender of the faith triumphantly pointed to the verse in Matthew which reads, "Let him which is on the housetop not come down."


B. One more time:

"The owner of an old-fashioned corner grocery store in a small country town was fond of quoting a passage of Scripture after each sale. He had three old friends that would sit around a pot-bellied stove, playing checkers on a faded board. His ability to produce a Scripture for all occasions never ceased to amuse the old timers, and they would listen to see what verse he would come up with that was relevant to the sale made.

A lady purchased some material and he said, “She seeketh wool, and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands.” A man bought a bag of flour and he said, “Man does not live by bread alone, but every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” A little boy bought some lollies and as he rung it up he quoted, “Suffer the little children to come unto me.”

It was nearly closing time when the chimes over the door jangled loudly. A well dressed young man, obviously a stranger from one of the larger towns down the road, entered. “Can I help you?” offered the proprietor.

“I need a blanket for my horse,” said the man. “He’s out in his trailer and it’s too cold for just one. Bring me the nicest one you’ve got!” The store owner went in the back store room and came back with a brown blanket. “That’ll be five dollars.”

“Five dollars? You’ve got to be kidding!”, said the man. “This horse is a thoroughbred. He gets only the best! He wouldn’t stand still for an old five-dollar blanket.” Without comment, the store owner took back the blanket, then merely selected a different colour and brought it out. “This one’s $25 dollars.”

“Now, look,” said the young man, “Perhaps I didn’t make myself clear. This isn’t just any old horse! He’s worth thousands! Now I want the best, most expensive blanket you’ve got! Understand?” The owner once more went into the store room, pulled out another colour of the same material and brought it back. “This is the only one left, and it’s $100 dollars.” “Now that’s more like it!” enthused the young man as he paid. Then, throwing the five dollar blanket over his shoulder, he left.

The old timers stared silently at the shopkeeper as they waited to see what possible Scripture he could come up with for that sale! Going behind the register, he rung up the hundred dollars and said, “He was a stranger, and I took him in.”

----------------

A liberal education is so useful. I suspect may people these days would never get to hear these classics.



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

27 Jul 2011, 12:03 pm

Thing is, like a lot of humor, those stories are funny because, frankly, they are too true to be funny.

There are people who do just that - as Peter said of Paul's writings, [there are "some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction."

There are those in the Abrahamic religions [as I cannot doubt there are in other religions] those who distort the words of the written or oral tradition to suit their purposes. Wrong thing to do, ruveyn, even if the intention be good, just as wrong if thde aim be bad.

Those who critique Christianity and the other religions are absolutely right to object to this objectionable practice.

-----------

But soft. If an atheist twists the words of scripture to score a point, is that not JUST as wrong? Yes, Socrates, that is pretty bad.

If a politically minded person - of any persuasion whatsoever - twists the wirds of a constitution or a law to suit his needs, is THAT not just as wrong.? You betch, Socrates.

And if a scientist adjusts his data, or a New Ager reinterprets the scientists theory, to bolster up a lie, to sell books or get a grant, is that not just as wrong? Socrates, that is incomprehensible and unpardonable.