Should Organ Donation Be Mandatory? (Supplemental)

Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 


Should Organ Donation Be Mandatory?
Absolutely; regardless of anybody's wishes to the contrary 11%  11%  [ 2 ]
Yes, but limited approved by the deceased or his executor 21%  21%  [ 4 ]
Maybe ... if there is a real need for THAT organ at THAT time 11%  11%  [ 2 ]
Maybe not ... medical science may soon make it unnecessary 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
No, except under extreme conditions 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Never; regardless of anbody's need for a transplant 47%  47%  [ 9 ]
Other: ________________ (Please explain) 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 19

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,817
Location: Stendec

04 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm

Let's do this one up right.

Another thread posed the same question, but without a poll. I'm starting a poll as a supplement to it.

Perhaps the mods can merge the two threads?


_________________
 
I have no love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


StevieC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 649
Location: Cupboard under the Stairs

04 Sep 2011, 9:31 pm

I'm not sure about certain organs tho - ie my brain and liver for different, but obvious reasons :P 8O


_________________
I'm a PC and Ubuntu was my idea.


My RSS feed:
www.steviecandtheplacetobe.net/rss.xml


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Sep 2011, 9:41 pm

StevieC wrote:
I'm not sure about certain organs tho - ie my brain and liver for different, but obvious reasons :P 8O


You can presume "donated" organs will become available only after their owner dies.

ruveyn



cw10
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 973

05 Sep 2011, 9:17 pm

No, for the same reasons selling your organs is illegal. Once it becomes law, the line becomes blurred.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

06 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm

Mandatory? Most assuredly not. I see a host of medical-ethical issues coming into play here, not the least of which is the creation of a therapeutic incentive to withhold treatment from a terminal patient with viable organs. When I suggest a DNR to a patient, I have no other incentive but the patient's quality of life. To create an internal pressure where my surgical colleagues are looking for donors is to blur what should be an absolutely clear ethical line.

And that's just post-mortem donation. There is nothing in this thread to distinguish an inter vivos gift of tissue. Kidneys and bone marrow are both donated by living donors--most often in directed donation, where the donor knows the recipient and donates with the express intention of therapeutic transplant to that recipient. But there are also undirected donations, and these are also valuable from a therapeutic perspective but we certainly should not (in my view) be compelling either type of donation.

But all that being said, tissue donation is a laudable act that saves countless lives. To the extent that we can encourage tissue donation, we should do so.


_________________
--James


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm

visagrunt wrote:

But all that being said, tissue donation is a laudable act that saves countless lives. To the extent that we can encourage tissue donation, we should do so.


That is why I am a thirty gallon blood donor. Lately I mostly do platelets because I can donate every two weeks. With whole blood one must wait 56 days. If I ever need a transfusion (I have yet to have one) I will not be ashamed to ask.

ruveyn



Judith_27
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13

19 Sep 2011, 7:08 am

No way, it should not be made mandatory. There is so many ethical issues about this, I would not know where to begin.. But yeah we could start at looking at a patient that is very sick, yet has some organs that work. And since that person is "most likely" to die from their sickness then the organs should be harvested... HOW HORRIBLE..

No way - absolutely and emphatically no way...



Booyakasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Oct 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,898

19 Sep 2011, 7:25 am

Fnord wrote:

Perhaps the mods can merge the two threads?


Sorry, the merge function is acting up.



Abgal64
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

19 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm

As soon as one is dead, of course. When a person is dead they are just resources that should be used to the fullest extent possible; they cannot feel, come back, think but they can help the living by being a resource for raw materials. As a precaution against organ harvesting from the terminally ill, I suggest strict punishments for those who withhold treatment from the terminally ill for the purpose of getting their organs.

Of course, cloning could soon make this debate moot.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

19 Sep 2011, 1:48 pm

Abgal64 wrote:
As soon as one is dead, of course. When a person is dead they are just resources that should be used to the fullest extent possible; they cannot feel, come back, think but they can help the living by being a resource for raw materials. As a precaution against organ harvesting from the terminally ill, I suggest strict punishments for those who withhold treatment from the terminally ill for the purpose of getting their organs.

Of course, cloning could soon make this debate moot.


The corpse of the dead is property of the estate of the deceased person. It should be disposed of by those who inherit control of the estate, namely the close relatives. If the deceased has made prior arrangement about donating his giblets then that arrangement should be honored. One's body is his -property- and not the property of the State.

ruveyn