The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
So how the US and their supporters (the Americans, Israelis and pro-Israel) expect from Palestinians to cease terrorism while both of their governments are playing hard to keep this people stateless like this?
It's been my experience that the vast majority of my fellow Americans really have little inkling what life is like for those in Israel, and have less than no inkling about what life is like for Palestinians.
It's too bad, really, because I seriously doubt our foreign policy would be what it is if they had any idea.
Quote:
Are they really realizing that casting the veto against forming a Palestinian state would be the death of the whole peace-process and the end of all Moderate and west-friendly Middle-eastern currents? Abbas would resign, Fatah will be no more, 14 March in Lebanon will be weaken even more, same for the Saudi King's current, the moderate branch of the Syrian opposition and Egyptian's rising new forces and the green movement in Iran....
Most of them don't realize there is even anything important going on in the conflict. The football season has started. And if it weren't football, they'd be doing something else.
Never, ever, underestimate the isolationist tendencies of Americans. The bulk of people here don't take notice that other countries exist unless we want to go on a sightseeing tour or someone makes the severe mistake of harming Americans on the American mainland.
Quote:
On the other hand, the only other alternative left would be the war-process and extremism , yes that's right, the veto will serve the causes of Hamas , Hezbollah, the Muslim brotherhood and what's worse of all, the Pro-Qaeda (Anti- Saudi King) branch of Wahhabists greatly, and they would all gain more popularity. In other term, there will be a lot of blood.
I can't say I understand the issues even remotely well, though I do seek out information from various sources to try to understand, at least somewhat, what they are.
As for the Saudis, you may see a gov't becoming truly opposed to U.S. gov't positions, but I have to wonder how much of that is just for domestic consumption. As long as the Saudi king depends on buyers for his oil, he will find it as difficult to make war with the West as the West finds it impossible to make war with the major oil-producing nations. And "war" includes diplomatic war as well as the literal sort.
The Saudi king seems to be affected by what's been going on in Arab countries. There are Saudis who seek goals of liberty just as there are people in the countries that are rising up against autocratic rulers.
How much of the standing tall against the U.S. is nothing more than yet another distraction to keep Saudis paying attention to what's going on outside their own country, so they don't get uppity about the problems in their own backyard?
Rulers of all sorts and of any culture are known to do this sort of thing. Certainly our politicians in the U.S. do it, and I seriously doubt Saudi rulers are so dimwitted they can't figure out it's a handy tool to maintain power.
You don't have to be Italian to realize that Machiavelli's methods can work.