Joined: 16 Oct 2011 Age: 39 Gender: Female Posts: 707
21 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
Ok a bit of background: I am currently an agnostic was raised a Christian. Not particularly taking a side here I just thought this was a hilarious thing to put into one of those mass-fowarded "inspiring" emails that religious people like to send.
It was all about a dying baby who was miraculously revived by the loving song of her little brother = a miracle of god, etc etc. Then at the end in a giant font is this gem:
'The evidence of God's presence far outweighs the proof of His absence.'
Really? Proof of his absence?? Not a good word to use when you're trying to advocate for his existence.
_________________ Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.
Joined: 6 May 2008 Gender: Male Posts: 60,939 Location:
21 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
It is fair to point out that the article was likely written by fundies for fundies, just as it is also fair to claim that most fundies have no idea how reason and logic actually work.
Joined: 26 Aug 2010 Age: 70 Gender: Male Posts: 35,189 Location: temperate zone
21 Oct 2011, 1:56 pm
I guess they meant that the "proof" for his existence outweights the "evidence" for his nonexistence, and they just mistakenly flipped the words "proof" and "evidence".
Joined: 6 May 2008 Gender: Male Posts: 60,939 Location:
21 Oct 2011, 2:04 pm
naturalplastic wrote:
I guess they meant that the "proof" for his existence outweights the "evidence" for his nonexistence, and they just mistakenly flipped the words "proof" and "evidence".