The one good thing about Mitt Rommey

Post Reply New Topic

Helping people figure out that charity is a freaking hoax.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyat ... wn-church/

He gives money to the Mormon Church even Bill Maher said that is not given to charity if it was given to Charity then name me one poor mormon

Now a real charity to give to are and I'll be glad to give a list.

ACET (AIDS charity)
Acid Survivors Trust International
Action Against Hunger
Acumen Fund
Adopt-A-Minefield
Adventist Development and Relief Agency
Afghanaid
African Children's Choir
African Medical and Research Foundation
African Well Fund
Africare
Age Concern
Age NI
Age UK
Aidchild
Aide médicale internationale
Aiducation
Al Birr Foundation
Al-Haramain Foundation
Åland Islands Peace Institute
Alfanar
Amazon Conservation Team
American Near East Refugee Aid
American Refugee Committee
AmeriCares
Amici del Mondo World Friends Onlus
The Asia Foundation
Asian-German Sports Exchange Program
Atlantic Philanthropies
AUMOHD
Australian Doctors for Africa
Avatar Meher Baba Trust
AVERT

Pandita Ramabai Mukti Mission
Partners In Development, Inc.
Peace Dividend Trust
Peace Players International
Peja Stojakovic Children's Foundation
Penal Reform International
Personal Energy Transportation
User:Phantasus38/sandbox
Plan (aid organisation)
Plan USA
Plan UK
Population Services International
Progressio Ireland
Project HOPE

Yet Mitt Romeny never gives to any of those charites only to the Mormon church which Bill Maher calls a cult he doesn't view it as a religion at least he said and I quote. The Jew Christian Muslim religion are religions at least they accept their craziness.

There are a number of good things about Mitt Romney. He is an honorable man of state. However, he is a fallible one, and there are things he does that I feel were misguided, and there are things he believes that I think are misguided, even harmful or downright dumb. That doesn't make him a bad guy. I'm just not going to vote for him: I think the man he is running against has done a fairly good job--certainly better than his predecessor--and I don't see any reason to replace him. I don't see anything so stellar about Mitt Romney that I ought to hold him in special favor.

Leave it to Republicans to start mud-slinging matches, I say. I think Dems ought to have higher style. But don't mind me. I'm just yakking.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDlM8MlmDfU[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6toQgXq1--s&feature=related[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvls4tnZs_A[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQwrB1vu74c&feature=related[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyp2QIGejq4[/youtube]

Maher has a point. No matter how charities divide and apply the money they raise (I think many of them are indeed a hoax), it makes no sense that charity donations are deductible. If the middle class taxpayer is forced to foot the bill for publicity stunts of billionaires and corporations, how is that charity?

Good question it isn't a charity when it is a publicity stunt for billonaires and corperations. They give to charity to make themselfs and their image look good so people will vote or support them.

He certainly did that when he put his dog in a carrier on top of the station wagon for a 12 hour ride to Canada.

I actually liked the guy from a few years ago.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer