Aha.
So, to kill innocent people in stupid wars (and majority of wars are stupid) or when instructed by authority
is OK or noble, but to kill innocent people if you are not backed up by goverment ( and you have a cause) is totally different issue?
At the end of the day we are all responsible for our own actions.
I said noble
murderer.
Murderer is not a very pretty word, is it?
By using that word I was acknowledging the horror of the act.
However she was starved of love, yet she used her life to save others from the same fate.
Yes, she was misled.
But she was pure in heart. That is my opinion.
I do not think I will become a mass murderer,
as I respect life in all forms.
And do not kill even insects.
Maybe I am too brutally honest, maybe I should kept some things to myself.
BTW: how many people that we see as noble were actually murderers?
(like Robin Hood, for example)
"So, to kill innocent people in stupid wars (and majority of wars are stupid) or when instructed by authority
Never said that. You're putting words in my mouth. A murder is only justified if the murder in question does more benefit than harm. For example, killing a brutal dictator is usually OK, but it depends on the case. And she wasn't noble at all.