Swiss even more hostile to EU entry idea than last year

Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

29 May 2012, 8:34 pm

Quote:
'Blessing' not to be in EU: Swiss poll (http://www.thelocal.ch/3386/20120524/)

A survey has found that the Swiss are even less in favour of joining the EU than they were last year.

The survey, carried out by the MIS Research Institute in Lausanne, has found that 82 percent of Swiss people are against accession talks with the EU, preferring instead to remain with the current bilateral treaty arrangements, newspaper Tages Anzeiger reported.

This figure is up from 72 percent last year, and will be the subject of a discussion on Thursday at the “Forum des 100” in Lausanne, which has invited some 850 guests, including Federal Councillor for the Free Democratic Party of Switzerland, Simonetta Sommaruga.


Good for the Swiss. :)



HisDivineMajesty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Planet Earth

29 May 2012, 9:49 pm

Damn these Swiss and their chocolate, mountains, clocks, stolen art and able democratic government! That said, we would have similar opposition if we had never joined it. The only reason a lot of people support is now because they've been scared into thinking there's no way back and we'll just have to take the poison.



CSBurks
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Apr 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 766

29 May 2012, 9:58 pm

Not surprising in my view. I imagine if member states held referendums, the EU would all but completely collapse.



HisDivineMajesty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Planet Earth

29 May 2012, 10:03 pm

CSBurks wrote:
Not surprising in my view. I imagine if member states held referendums, the EU would all but completely collapse.


If they held referendums over the new stability mechanism, accession of new member states and annually-increased budgets for private jets, they would collapse. Luckily, they can sneak those things through parliament in most cases. In the few cases where they tried a referendum, their proposals were cleanly removed from the political agenda, only to return with a different title as normal legislation.



Keeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2006
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,875
Location: Earth

01 Jun 2012, 4:54 am

This is no wonder when you look at it from a economic point of view, as Switzerland has always been ahead in terms of EU countries on wealth measures. There's another obvious country in the same situation, and that is Norway.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

01 Jun 2012, 8:47 am

Given Europe's current economic woes, is it any wonder?

I think part of the EU's problem is that it allowed a bunch of economically-weak countries at the far eastern edge of Europe to join, and join quickly. Among other things, this caused mass migrations of workers to stronger nations, where they over-saturated the job market and drove down wages for everyone.
You can't have a successful common currency without a centralized economic policy.



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

01 Jun 2012, 9:06 am

Not surprised by this at all.

While I am definitely in favour of regional integration to some extent, I think the EU has taken it way too far. I've been waiting for it to come tumbling down like a pack of cards for some time now.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


DC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,477

02 Jun 2012, 6:36 am

CSBurks wrote:
Not surprising in my view. I imagine if member states held referendums, the EU would all but completely collapse.


You could probably say the same thing about the US...



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

02 Jun 2012, 9:11 am

It would be good for America to divide into about 4 to 6 countries, perhaps with a common currency. We are too large, and there is too much power and money in the hands of our elected officials. This has resulted in almost incomprehensible levels of corruption. Our different regions have different economic bases and different cultures, and each could better look after its own interests without the input of these millionaire "representatives" from afar.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

02 Jun 2012, 11:13 am

The Swiss weren't even apart of the UN until 10 or so years ago.

If you're already a developed country, why would you want to join the EU?



TM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,122

02 Jun 2012, 11:17 am

The Swiss being against the EU is obvious, they have a hell of a lot more to lose than gain by membership. They aren't Greece, Italy, Spain who would get cheaper loans if they joined, they largely have access to the markets already through trade agreements, they currently run a very responsible fiscal policy and so on.

There is no reason for a country to join the EU when there is nothing for them to gain. Germany gained a huge export market, Italy, Spain, Greece, and so on gained the ability to borrow money as if they were running responsible, conservative budgets and a positive trade balance.