ArrantPariah wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Okay when the Bible makes a reference to falling stars, it is likely a reference to meteors...
You do realize that people of that time had no vocabularly concerning meteors. Anyone care to suggest how God is supposed to explain to a people that are at a Bronze Age technological level the concept of Outer Space...
Meteorites used to quite literally be considered fallen stars, so we have to look at the level of understanding of the people at the time.
Quite trying to claim that God doesn't exist because he didn't explain to people running around with spears, how to build a Saturn V rocket. It would have been completely pointless because they wouldn't have understood a word of it.
You're funny!
I fail to see what is so humorous about pointing out something that is so blatently obvious that it is surprising a lot of people didn't realize this.
In order to explain things, one needs a common frame of reference, considering they didn't even have telescopes at the time, and most telescopes couldn't see asteroids or meteors anyways, the people of that era would have no frame of reference.
Closest thing to what they would be able to understand, is to associate meteorites as fallen stars.
What is noted in the Bible that people think disproves God, simply because it is explaining things in a manner that we know isn't accurate from a scientific standpoint, doesn't disprove God at all. All it demonstrates is that the Bible was written in a manner so that people from that time period would be able to understand it on a conceptual basis.
If you lived in a cave your whole life and never saw a tree, would you have a clue what someone meant when they said they saw a Pine Tree. You wouldn't because you would have no frame of reference.