Gurdjieff was an interesting character. In some senses, even though his non-scientific approach was the polar opposite of Dennett's, his interests and some of his essential ideas were broadly similar.
I should say straight away that I subscribe fully to Dennett's kind of materialism on the basis that I can see evolution by natural selection being sufficient as an explanation for the organization of all living things however, the raw materials at nature's disposal for this exercise are not yet fully understood and therefore many mysteries still remain.
I think the level of reduction we've gotten to so far is already pretty impressive. Studies by Garner et al.and Liu et al. have now achieved artificial memory formation and recall in lab animals and the function of some nervous subsystems of insects have been duplicated in out-board electronics so I think it's perfectly appropriate to consider some of the implications of thought experiments along the lines that Dennett and Hofstadter have written about. To save any confusion, by this I mean that I can accept that if the functional components of my brain were carefully migrated, one by one, to a different physical substrate - then there would be no point at which I would lose consciousness or memory etc. but may actually have been "teleported" to someplace else. If this much can be accepted, then the fun begins
physicsnut42: What was the movie you mentioned?