Quote:
Jehovah's Witness boy ordered to have transfusionA teenage boy suffering a lethal form of blood cancer has vowed to "rip out" the IV needle if doctors attempt a blood transfusion against his religious beliefs.But the NSW Supreme Court has overruled the wishes of the 17-year-old patient and his parents, ordering him to undergo the potentially lifesaving procedure.
The teen, a devout Jehovah's Witness, was admitted to the Sydney Children's Hospital with Hodgkin's disease in January last year.
I would be tempted to say "let him die" if he's over 18. If he's of sound mind and if he knows what he's doing, then frankly he should be quite free to see through the consequences of his religion-fuelled stupidity.
If, on the other hand, his parents are actually coercing him to reject blood, then that's another matter altogether.
What do others think?