Anger at God and Autism
First off all, I want to set the mood straight off the bat- this post isn't a atheistic or agnostic tirade against God (and when I saw "God" in this context, I'm talking about the God of the Bible, of Christianity and Judaism)- Yahweh, God the Father, Jesus, etc).
The point of this post is to share my personal beliefs, and present the claim that anger towards God is a direct and
understandable response to an individual being autistic.
Autism and Its Effect on Neurotypical Parents via Faith:
I have read many articles and stories on the Internet about parents who give birth to autistic children. Autism advocacy is big right now with the whole "Autism Awareness", and growing statistic of autism rates. 1 in 88 children in the United States are born with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). 1 out of 54 boys and 1 in 252 girls are diagnosed with autism in the United States (www.autismspeaks.org).
From the many articles I've read, when neurotypical parents give birth to severely to moderately autistic kids, a lot of them immediately get angry at God, or if they have a stronger faith, they question Him as to why He allowed their child to be born autistic. But often, their train of thought is this (and in the articles I've read, they've expressed their thoughts)- "Why is my child so different from every other child?" "Am I being punished by God for something I did by creating my child autistic?", "My child will never be like other children- he/she will never be able to do AB and C". Most learn to cope with their child's disability, and learns to love and appreciate their child just the way they ware.
In some cases neurotypical parents even blame God for "ruining" their child, even though these instances are rare.
So Autism does create anger towards God, as well as it does create confusion, even among neurotypicals.
Autism advocacy primarily focuses on parents and family members who have children who are severely to moderately autistic, and are in need of daily assistance and help. I do not believe that autism advocacy really focuses on high functioning autistics, like the majority of the people on this forum, because in my opinion, the focus is more on the parents of autistic children, and their struggle to cope wit their children's disabilities.
No, this is not a "us vs. them", "aspies vs. neurotypicals" debate, it is simply what I believe to be true. Autism advocacy is focused primarily on neurotypical parents and family members dealing with someone who has severe to moderate autism.
My testimony:
I used to be a Christian for a long time, and used to go to youth groups at church, and read my Bible often. I used to be very knowledgeable on the Bible, and was able to remember Scripture by heart. I used to feel like I was love by God because I was accepted by His children, other Christians.
But when I started looking at question of "Why did God create me autistic?", I couldn't find the answer. I have struggled in my life because of autism- I've never had a legitimate girlfriend, never dated, never got married, don't have a career started yet (and I'm nearing 27), and don't live independently yet. The future fills me with dread and apprehension, because I question my competency because I am so far behind in so many areas.
When I started looking at the World, and seeing how far behind I was because of my autism, that is when I began questioning God and His "goodness". The reference scripture for why people are disabled can be found in John 9:1-3. Jesus and His disciples are walking down a road, and encounter a blind man. His disciples immediately asked "Rabbi, what sin did this man commit, or what sins did his parents commit, that he be made blind." Jesus replied "This man is blind not because of his sins, or the sins of his parents. He is blind so that the power of God could be seen through him." After saying that, Jesus healed the man.
I felt that was insulting- God purposely made me delayed and weaker than everyone else to somehow show the world His glory through my weakness. If I told you that you were autistic because God wanted to show His glory through your disability, would you not be insulted?
I have been told by Christians (whom I still hold in high regard, because they are creations of God, like myself) that "God loves you, and He has a plan for your life!", "You can still serve God with your disability", "God loves you and created you the way you are for a reason!"
Really? If He loved me so much, why didn't He make me like the rest of His children, neurotypical, without mental or physical defects? How do I know He has a purpose for my life if He has allowed me to struggle in so many areas? He does not vindicate Himself, He does not explain Himself, despite my requests that He would show me why He made me this way.
I am merely supposed to assume He has my best intentions without evidence to support that belief.
I don't want to be angry at God, but I feel like I don't have any other choice- He doesn't explain Himself, even though He can. If He would just tell me that my life has a purpose, and that He created me the way I am for a reason, I would have no reason to be angry at Him.
But I suppose that is too much to ask....
I see a lot of autistics who are agnostic or atheist. I respect their belief to not believe in God, or to believe there is a God, but not know who He is. But I know who God is, I know He exists, but I can't fathom for the life of me why He allows so many innocent people to suffer, while He allows so many others to be created "normally". It is almost random. This is my testimony.
I take the comment "He is blind so that the power of God could be seen through him" to be explained by the next sentence: "After saying that, Jesus healed the man". In other words, this is not a comment about all blind men, or all disabled people, it is a comment about one specific disabled person - the blind man that Jesus is about to heal. At the particular moment that Jesus found that blind man, his blindness became an opportunity for Jesus to show his compassion and his power over nature - rather than an opportunity for pondering whose fault it was that he was blind. The disciples should not have been judging the blind man or his parents, they should have been helping him. Jesus doesn't really explain why disability exists - or even why this particular person became disabled in the first place. By healing those he came across, Jesus showed that God cares about the disabled - and he wants us to care about them too. It is much more important that I know what I should be doing for disabled people than that I know why they exist - it is enough for me to know that they exist (as far as my responsibility goes) for showing how much God loves them and not for stigmatising, casting out, bullying, neglecting, etc. In relation to me and my responsibility, they exist for me to show forth the glorious compassion of God.
I use my Aspie qualities to mentor an Aspie teenager. There are plenty of opportunities for Aspies to help others - both other Aspies and NTs in need. I am prepared to be an Aspie for God's sake (hopefully the best Aspie I can be), and to use my Aspie-ness as a way of serving others. I can research well, because I am an Aspie, so I try to give people the information that they want and need. I can accept people that NTs stigmatise, because I too am a stigmatised Aspie. The apostle Paul did not think that disability was any reason to pull back from God: " And {the Lord} said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you: for my strength is made perfect in weakness'. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me." Becoming an NT won't make your life more worthwhile - there are plenty of worthless NTs. Becoming the best Aspie you can be, with the help of God, will make your life worthwhile.
PS: what makes you think that NTs don't have defects? They can have mental defects, physical defects, and - more importantly - moral defects. Not all defects or differences are neurological. A broken leg is a defect - plenty of NTs get those. NTs can be the victims of crime. NTs can lose their whole family in a car accident. NTs can have perfectly formed children who grow up to become mass murderers - with hindsight they would much rather have had an autistic child. NTs can end up in concentration camps; be swept away by tsunamis; get blind drunk and fall onto the railway line (I know an NT who lost an arm and a leg that way). Being an NT is no guarantee of happiness or superiority. Most NTs would be extremely proud to have the accomplishments that Temple Grandin or Vernon Smith (Nobel Prize) or, say, Daryl Hannah (actress) achieved as people on the autism spectrum.
Being an NT is overrated; being a good person is underrated.
I'm not a religious man, but I do believe that there is an unnamed, unknown force in the universe behind it all.
And I may as well call it god, for the sake of this argument.
And recently, I've gone through yet another rough patch, and again I question why, why did he make me like this. Why did he make me autistic, why couldn't I at least look normal, why did I have to be an abomination. Where the hell is this in his bloody plan?
More so, why did he make the normal people hate us? It's barely even opinion. It's almost instinct for them.
Does he want me pushed to the edge? For what purpose? Because I have to become a monster for something? Or a test? Because I don't see anyone else going through such a test aside from us, and it never ends, it never gets better, I never find anywhere I can fit in.
And the details. The intolerably cruel details. Why would he give something with no possibility of ever being loved the ability to love? Surely I'd be better off without it. Why would he give me ambitions I have little hope of accomplishing? Why give me the constant, grinding background noise of a sex drive without the ability to be sexually attractive?
The more I think about it, the more I hate him. The more I think that he'll have a lot to answer for, and this time, "myterious ways" is NOT going to cut it.
I take the comment "He is blind so that the power of God could be seen through him" to be explained by the next sentence: "After saying that, Jesus healed the man". In other words, this is not a comment about all blind men, or all disabled people, it is a comment about one specific disabled person - the blind man that Jesus is about to heal. At the particular moment that Jesus found that blind man, his blindness became an opportunity for Jesus to show his compassion and his power over nature - rather than an opportunity for pondering whose fault it was that he was blind. The disciples should not have been judging the blind man or his parents, they should have been helping him. Jesus doesn't really explain why disability exists - or even why this particular person became disabled in the first place. By healing those he came across, Jesus showed that God cares about the disabled - and he wants us to care about them too. It is much more important that I know what I should be doing for disabled people than that I know why they exist - it is enough for me to know that they exist (as far as my responsibility goes) for showing how much God loves them and not for stigmatising, casting out, bullying, neglecting, etc. In relation to me and my responsibility, they exist for me to show forth the glorious compassion of God.
I use my Aspie qualities to mentor an Aspie teenager. There are plenty of opportunities for Aspies to help others - both other Aspies and NTs in need. I am prepared to be an Aspie for God's sake (hopefully the best Aspie I can be), and to use my Aspie-ness as a way of serving others. I can research well, because I am an Aspie, so I try to give people the information that they want and need. I can accept people that NTs stigmatise, because I too am a stigmatised Aspie. The apostle Paul did not think that disability was any reason to pull back from God: " And {the Lord} said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you: for my strength is made perfect in weakness'. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me." Becoming an NT won't make your life more worthwhile - there are plenty of worthless NTs. Becoming the best Aspie you can be, with the help of God, will make your life worthwhile.
PS: what makes you think that NTs don't have defects? They can have mental defects, physical defects, and - more importantly - moral defects. Not all defects or differences are neurological. A broken leg is a defect - plenty of NTs get those. NTs can be the victims of crime. NTs can lose their whole family in a car accident. NTs can have perfectly formed children who grow up to become mass murderers - with hindsight they would much rather have had an autistic child. NTs can end up in concentration camps; be swept away by tsunamis; get blind drunk and fall onto the railway line (I know an NT who lost an arm and a leg that way). Being an NT is no guarantee of happiness or superiority. Most NTs would be extremely proud to have the accomplishments that Temple Grandin or Vernon Smith (Nobel Prize) or, say, Daryl Hannah (actress) achieved as people on the autism spectrum.
Being an NT is overrated; being a good person is underrated.
And why would god create a disabled person to help the disabled people he created, who wouldn't need help if not for him?
And where's that compassion now? Where as I sit here with no future and options beyond horrendous crimes running thin? As I'm about to go outside to get food and be judged and hated, to have to fear crowds of his rabid creations, waiting to kill whatever dares show difference to them? Where's that love? Because the way I see it, he loves the NTs. He hates us.
I think the real problem is the OP's negativity about himself and being an Aspie. There are plenty of Aspies who don't believe in God who still manage to like themselves and like being an Aspie. Blaming God could allow you to avoid taking responsibility for yourself.
I felt bad about myself after getting a diagnosis - that was internalised prejudice. It was not a pleasant experience. For me, mentoring an Aspie school student has been a useful thing for my sense of self-worth: in a practical way I realised that being an Aspie enables me to do things that most other people cannot do - things that other Aspies could do too.
Asking yourself "what worthwhile things can I do?" may be a more useful line of thought for you than worrying about God and the existence of disability. In the end, you will be happier as a person I think.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9448b/9448bad1a14a481e19228f10f77575947453353d" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
I'm actually quite happy, now that I've learned what and who I am. I enjoy my obsessive interests - it's hard to understand how most people don't have subjects they focus on like a laser.
And to the OP - for the longest time I thought I would never meet anyone, but today I'm a husband and a father. It can happen to you, too.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
V, just one thing to add that I forgot to mention earlier. Make sure you actually really do know God exists and that you're not mistaking your strong conviction that God exists to knowledge that he does. Knowledge of someone to exist requires a significant degree of observation of such an entity that just doesn't seem to apply whenever it comes to God.
Have you ever seen God literally? Have you seen a physical incarnation of God or a series of amazing fantastical signs that conclusively showed you he was at least something worthy of being called God? Have you ever heard God's voice?
You may feel God's existence is intuitive but that does not mean God actually exists because it feels intuitive to you.
What makes you so sure that the strange coincidences, things you couldn't explain, and lucky happenings in your life were the work of a god? If you can hear a voice in your head, that sounds unlike your own, that you believe to be God, why don't you try asking it if it is really God, or has ever met a god? Whatever strange things have happened in your life, that seem too unlikely to have happened by chance, you can't be sure that a limitless source of power caused them to happen. There are other possibilities. There can be higher powers in existence that aren't all-powerful or omnipotent, without there being a god. There can be power without there being limitless power.
AngelRho
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40a52/40a5250dc4163a35cb216f017ca32e665aed619f" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
The point of this post is to share my personal beliefs, and present the claim that anger towards God is a direct and
understandable response to an individual being autistic.
Autism and Its Effect on Neurotypical Parents via Faith:
I have read many articles and stories on the Internet about parents who give birth to autistic children. Autism advocacy is big right now with the whole "Autism Awareness", and growing statistic of autism rates. 1 in 88 children in the United States are born with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). 1 out of 54 boys and 1 in 252 girls are diagnosed with autism in the United States (www.autismspeaks.org).
From the many articles I've read, when neurotypical parents give birth to severely to moderately autistic kids, a lot of them immediately get angry at God, or if they have a stronger faith, they question Him as to why He allowed their child to be born autistic. But often, their train of thought is this (and in the articles I've read, they've expressed their thoughts)- "Why is my child so different from every other child?" "Am I being punished by God for something I did by creating my child autistic?", "My child will never be like other children- he/she will never be able to do AB and C". Most learn to cope with their child's disability, and learns to love and appreciate their child just the way they ware.
In some cases neurotypical parents even blame God for "ruining" their child, even though these instances are rare.
So Autism does create anger towards God, as well as it does create confusion, even among neurotypicals.
Autism advocacy primarily focuses on parents and family members who have children who are severely to moderately autistic, and are in need of daily assistance and help. I do not believe that autism advocacy really focuses on high functioning autistics, like the majority of the people on this forum, because in my opinion, the focus is more on the parents of autistic children, and their struggle to cope wit their children's disabilities.
No, this is not a "us vs. them", "aspies vs. neurotypicals" debate, it is simply what I believe to be true. Autism advocacy is focused primarily on neurotypical parents and family members dealing with someone who has severe to moderate autism.
My testimony:
I used to be a Christian for a long time, and used to go to youth groups at church, and read my Bible often. I used to be very knowledgeable on the Bible, and was able to remember Scripture by heart. I used to feel like I was love by God because I was accepted by His children, other Christians.
But when I started looking at question of "Why did God create me autistic?", I couldn't find the answer. I have struggled in my life because of autism- I've never had a legitimate girlfriend, never dated, never got married, don't have a career started yet (and I'm nearing 27), and don't live independently yet. The future fills me with dread and apprehension, because I question my competency because I am so far behind in so many areas.
When I started looking at the World, and seeing how far behind I was because of my autism, that is when I began questioning God and His "goodness". The reference scripture for why people are disabled can be found in John 9:1-3. Jesus and His disciples are walking down a road, and encounter a blind man. His disciples immediately asked "Rabbi, what sin did this man commit, or what sins did his parents commit, that he be made blind." Jesus replied "This man is blind not because of his sins, or the sins of his parents. He is blind so that the power of God could be seen through him." After saying that, Jesus healed the man.
I felt that was insulting- God purposely made me delayed and weaker than everyone else to somehow show the world His glory through my weakness. If I told you that you were autistic because God wanted to show His glory through your disability, would you not be insulted?
I have been told by Christians (whom I still hold in high regard, because they are creations of God, like myself) that "God loves you, and He has a plan for your life!", "You can still serve God with your disability", "God loves you and created you the way you are for a reason!"
Really? If He loved me so much, why didn't He make me like the rest of His children, neurotypical, without mental or physical defects? How do I know He has a purpose for my life if He has allowed me to struggle in so many areas? He does not vindicate Himself, He does not explain Himself, despite my requests that He would show me why He made me this way.
I am merely supposed to assume He has my best intentions without evidence to support that belief.
I don't want to be angry at God, but I feel like I don't have any other choice- He doesn't explain Himself, even though He can. If He would just tell me that my life has a purpose, and that He created me the way I am for a reason, I would have no reason to be angry at Him.
But I suppose that is too much to ask....
I see a lot of autistics who are agnostic or atheist. I respect their belief to not believe in God, or to believe there is a God, but not know who He is. But I know who God is, I know He exists, but I can't fathom for the life of me why He allows so many innocent people to suffer, while He allows so many others to be created "normally". It is almost random. This is my testimony.
From my understanding of the Bible, it doesn't necessarily follow that God intended that you (or anyone else) to be autistic or have any form of disability. Sure, God is responsible for our creation, but I don't think that disability, pain, sorrow, etc., were ever supposed to be all part of God's plan.
It's the age-old question: "Why is their pain?/Why do good people suffer?/Why do bad things happen to good people?/..." I know several people who have either died from cancer or are currently in treatment for it. One guy I know is a preacher's kid with a brain tumor. Rather than freaking out about a potentially deadly disease, or going on and on about how he's ready to fight/being overly optimistic, his MAIN concern in dealing with his illness is that at all stages of treatment that his mind won't be affected to the point that he says/does things that would appear to be dishonoring to God. It reminds me of the rantings of Job, repeatedly calling out to God "Why...?" Much of what Job had to say was the result of someone whose mind was deeply affected by the level of suffering he had to endure.
The thing is, while my acquaintance with a brain tumor is handling things quietly and serenely, being angry or feeling abandoned is a natural response when bad things happen.
I would say that it is not good to direct anger towards God. It isn't sinful to be angry; rather, we go wrong when we choose poor responses to our situation.
And since injustice, pain, disease, and such are not part of God's plan, it is incorrect to "blame God" for all the ills of the world.
If you want to blame someone or something, blame the imperfect world we live in and the people living in it who made it the way it is. Disease, war, and all kinds of suffering are products of a fallen creation--not the world as God created it, but the world that mankind replaced it with. Suffering and death are all part of our reality, and that goes all the way back to Eden.
All you can do is trust God and do the best you can with what you're given. That's all that any of us can do. You should feel angry. I imagine God is pretty angry, too, with things the way they are. But, of course, if you know the Bible very well, then you'll understand that the way things are right now are only temporary.
If God is in full control as you believe, then he must be responsible not only for all good but all evil. If he created beings and gave them free will and they were wholly good, then free will would be a choice among good deeds with good outcomes. There is no escaping this. If god created a tempter or prosecutor to test His creations and also created an impulse in his creations to do evil, then God is responsible for that impulse and how it is evident in the choices his creations make.
If you are going to believe in God and that God controls the makeup of individual creations, then I think you have to give God the benefit of the doubt: the relevant scripture is "All things work together for the good" -- all things must include hell, evil, suffering, pain, death, and the autistic traits that make you feel injured. If you Believe in God and reject the possibility that He might be something like the evil Demiurge of the Gnostics, then you must have faith in the idea that all things work together for the good. I think the key scripture is not the parable in John, but rathe the whole of Job, Ecclesiastes, Isaiah and Micah together with Luke and Acts. I realize that's a lot of scripture, but it makes no sense to chop these huge ideas into little snippets and argue them.
I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.
What does chance mean, here?
He has told you, O mortal, what is good;
and what does the Lord require of you
but to do justice, and to love kindness,
and to walk humbly with your God?
Do the words say that God is fair by standards we can judge? I think not. If you are to believe meaningfully, I think this understanding is the beginning of wisdom.
But I am probably a lost heretic, so take this with a few grains of salt!
Theoretically speaking, there are infinitely better worlds than the world we happen to live in, especially those that lack the antecedents of evil, thus rendering such worlds logically better than a world that allows for evil. Suggesting that God needs hell and evil to exist for the ultimate good is just wrong.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Autism and Fatigue? |
10 Dec 2024, 9:10 am |
Autism & Talking |
02 Feb 2025, 6:39 pm |
Autistic vs Has Autism |
22 Jan 2025, 10:20 pm |
How can autism be monetized? |
30 Jan 2025, 10:37 am |