Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 

jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

27 Oct 2013, 9:46 am

Not the sense that it claims, obviously.

A Good Men’s Rights Movement Is Hard to Find

Quote:
Last month, AVFM and CAFE (the Canadian Association For Equality, an MRA group) held a “historic” rally in Toronto. Attended by a few dozen people, the rally featured speakers airing grievances about violence against men, and men’s unfair treatment in family courts, the workplace, and educational institutions. "Men matter,” the crowd cheered. One speaker, who was quickly ushered away from the mic, called for violent uprising against communism. But what was most notable about the rally was that not a single speaker proposed a solution to any of the problems they identified.

Instead, no matter what the issue is, the response from Men’s Rights Activists is the same: blame, threaten, and harass women, mostly online.
...
One of their tactics is to put out a cash bounty for personal information—including home addresses, places of employment, email addresses, and phone numbers—of feminists who upset them. The deluge of hate mail, rape and death threats for those on the receiving end of these witch hunts is hard to describe.


The article documents some of the actual hate mail, but it would violate the TOS for this forum so I could not quote it here. Click on the title to read the full article.

For a brief analysis of the article, and a parallel perspective, click the link below.

How So-Called “Men’s Rights Activists” Make Actual Work On Behalf Of Men Harder

Quote:
Men’s higher death rate in wars and from crime, men’s higher death rate on the job, sexual violence against men, and men’s higher suicide rate are all issues that are important, but represent to MRAs one thing and one thing only: A chance to deflect and derail discussions about feminist issues. They don’t do [anything] to actually address these issues. They often distort them deliberately, hiding some of the relevant contextual factors that would make it clear that what they call “men’s issues” are often labor issues, results of racial discrimination, and yes, feminist issues—particularly sexual violence, which affects both men and women but is nonetheless enacted primarily by men as an expression of masculine power.
...
The good news is I think it’s unlikely that many people will be snookered if they go looking for real information and instead find MRA sites whose primary interest in these issues is to use them to accuse feminists of man-hating because reasons. The bad news is Jaclyn is dead right that the problem is people who actually care might not be able to wade through all the misogynist nonsense to find real activists doing real work to help men and boys—work that usually involves helping women and girls, as well.


Both titles link to the articles themselves.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

27 Oct 2013, 1:16 pm

Meh.

Smart guys will be bright enough to see through the garbage. Dumb guys won't.

It's not so much an issue of MRAs, it's just the age-old problem of dumb people. The majority of men I know are smart and don't go for woman-hating.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

28 Oct 2013, 6:28 pm

Interesting perspective. Thanks.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

29 Oct 2013, 3:20 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
Meh.

Smart guys will be bright enough to see through the garbage. Dumb guys won't.

It's not so much an issue of MRAs, it's just the age-old problem of dumb people. The majority of men I know are smart and don't go for woman-hating.
:thumleft:



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

Geekonychus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,660

29 Oct 2013, 4:16 pm

AceOfSpades wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Meh.

Smart guys will be bright enough to see through the garbage. Dumb guys won't.

It's not so much an issue of MRAs, it's just the age-old problem of dumb people. The majority of men I know are smart and don't go for woman-hating.
:thumleft:
:thumright:

The MRA movement hasn't done a single thing to actually help men. Maybe some of those "cash bounties" used for harrassing feminists could be used to open a Men's DV shelter or something.........Nope.........



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

29 Oct 2013, 5:18 pm

LKL wrote:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/10/20/the-masculine-mystique-inside-the-men-s-rights-movement-mrm.html

here's another one.


I think that the writer offers a valuable perspective, although I came away from reading the article feeling that it characterized death threats and the like as more counterproductive than vile and despicable.

Using intimidation to silence people who disagree with you, or deliberate distortions to counter rational argument discredits any cause, in my opinion. We can disagree about the validity of the way a particular event is framed (and I consider reframing events to have substantial value when done conscientiously), but inaccurately reporting salient facts in order to reshape an event to fit an agenda indicates arguing in bad faith.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

29 Oct 2013, 5:22 pm

Geekonychus wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Meh.

Smart guys will be bright enough to see through the garbage. Dumb guys won't.

It's not so much an issue of MRAs, it's just the age-old problem of dumb people. The majority of men I know are smart and don't go for woman-hating.
:thumleft:
:thumright:

The MRA movement hasn't done a single thing to actually help men. Maybe some of those "cash bounties" used for harrassing feminists could be used to open a Men's DV shelter or something.........Nope.........
It's strange how people spend money destructively instead of constructively. But then again I guess it's easier to destroy than create things. That's the difference between being pro and anti. MRA is fundamentally anti-feminist so it's no surprise.



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

30 Oct 2013, 2:13 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQ1Ix4tR1AM[/youtube]


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

30 Oct 2013, 9:49 pm

For that kind of man, it's better for everyone if he 'goes his own way' rather than get frustrated trying to inflict his ideology on women who aren't interested in validating it.



Declension
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,807

30 Oct 2013, 9:59 pm

Men have a lot of problems that women don't. The funny thing is, people who call themselves "feminists" are the main people who have identified these problems and have developed theory about how to fix them. MRA's like to ignore that particular part of feminist history - it isn't very convenient for them.



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

30 Oct 2013, 11:17 pm

I can't speak for the present as my only experience is of the mid-90's during my parent's divorce. During that time my parents separated and my sister and I went to live with out mother. Who very quickly moved into a new permanent relationship with one of my Father's very close friends. Although the relationship between my mother and her new partner seemed to improve her happiness, it came at a fairly serious cost. He decided that he did not like me and took to beating me. From this, I told my mother and father and my the former told me to get along and the latter was furious. His fury nearly led my father take become quite violent but before he could complain to the police, my mother accused him of being physically violent towards her during their relationship. Although the accusation was false, it was enough to ensure that the family court revoked my father's visitation rights and as a result I lost access to the only person who was supporting me through a very rough time.

Eventually, after some very old fashioned policing by our local constables, my stepfather backed off quite a bit. I was able to see my father after sneaking off from school. He took me to the police and they took my statement and then had to take action against my father for violating a family court order. It was enough for the court to take action and I was allowed to live primarily with my father. There was a little stipulation in the ruling, I had to go back and spent time with my mother on every second weakened. What a great idea that was, sending me back to a place where I was physically in danger. Eventually after six months of that, where on every second weekend the police had to take me to my stepfather's house because I refused to go voluntarily (the police hated this by the way and always apologised for having to do it), the family court gave me the choice to live with my father permanently. My sister however had to stay with my mother and the family was totally broken up and my father had exhausted his middle class wealth in order to get me away from my stepfather. As a result we spent the next 5 years dependent on the Salvation Army living on very little money, as jobs for people my father's age are not easy to come by.

The story has a happy ending though. My father took care of me, so now my fiancé and I take care of him. The battle took a hell of a toll on him (he looks like he is 20 years older than he is) but he is still a pretty awesome dad. He worked two jobs, one of them night shift to put me through university and then helped me pay for grad school in America. When I got into a top school in the States we burned a collection of statistics we had beaten to get to where we are today.

I cannot stomach the MRA movement, it has too many very nasty people in its ranks and to be honest I can see why the system had a preference for taking my mother's side a priori. What happened however was that the system did very lasting damage to my family despite its best intentions. Thus I take issue with people who say there is nothing to discuss and to move along. The reforms are obviously not complete and more work needs to be done. Fathers will have a voice in where the system goes to from here and shutting them out or creating a negative association with a political movement will do nobody any good except those with vested interests in the status quo. I don't hate women, I have been in a happy committed relationship for 5 years and she earns more than I do. So there are obviously benefits to the feminist revolution but separating the debate from men and treating cases with ideological lenses that allow people to be silenced because of what they are not who they are or what they have done will do none of us any good over the long term.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


redriverronin
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 267

LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

30 Oct 2013, 11:36 pm

wow, that really sucks, 91. I feel personally very lucky that when my parents split up, they kept my brother and I out of the fight and they both made sure that we still had two parents.

No matter how much one side hates the other, there's no excuse for lying about one's former partner in court, in an attempt to hurt them or deny them visitation without cause.



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

30 Oct 2013, 11:43 pm

LKL wrote:
No matter how much one side hates the other, there's no excuse for lying about one's former partner in court, in an attempt to hurt them or deny them visitation without cause.


My view is that the number one thing these situations call for is compassion and empathy for every party. MRA groups dig trenches and that is just never going to solve the problem, but it does make for a spectacular dummy spit.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.