Raptor wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Tough titty.It's not that I had two,I really didn't want any but lucky accidents happen.Two means you have reproduced yourselves,that's why I like that figure.I'm not saying you can only have one.Like some countries.
No, one means you've reproduced yourself.
Quote:
Do you like it when you see all those litters of pups abandoned?Whats the difference with a mom and dad just cranking out the babies and neglecting them?
I have a rather
*austere
"don't breed 'em if you can't feed 'em" mentality about having kids, but that doesnt mean I want the government to step in and do something about every problem. There's no law about dogs having to be fixed, either. The answer to everything doesnt lie in government intervention.
*Austere: Often intentionally mislabeled as thinly veiled hate speech or racism by liberals.
Misslizard wrote:
I never used the word austere.
I did.
Quote:
It takes two to have a baby,you must have been bad at biology,two people having two babies means they have reproduced each other.
No, it takes two (2) people to produce one (1) offspring. Having done that, those two (2) people have reproduced. That is unless you're suggesting having two in the form of one of each gender so
they can reproduce together (a.k.a incest). How much further are you going to paint yourself into a corner on this?
Quote:
Since you don't like welfare,why would you think this is a bad idea,it would cut down on food stamps and services,plus the consumption of resources.
I dislike being told what to do by the government even more than welfare.
Quote:
People seem to think they are not animals,they are,overcrowding leads to problems.More competition for resources such as water,oil,or food,stop population growth and some of these will lessen.
Life's a sh!t sandwich, aint it......
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson