tarantella64 wrote:
Perhaps Ireland will accommodate then with a chunk of itself. Or maybe you can persuade Canada to donate. We're only there because of your own Bible stories anyway.
The zionists are there because of in part the holocaust, and the fact that the British promised both parties the lands and caused the conflict when they couldnt make good on those promises. The Americans enflamed the problem by giving disproportionate support to Israel. I have always maintained therefore that it should be the responsibility of the three countries that have created and maintained this crisis (Germany, USA and UK) to safeguard the sanctuary of the Jews. It certainly shouldn't be the burden of the indigenous arabs who made zero contribution historically to Jewish persecution.
tarantella64 wrote:
Do you honestly think that hundreds of thousands of European Jews really wanted to go live in the desert? It was the best of a set of bad choices.
I blame the historical anti semites in the west who didn't want to give sanctuary to the Jews in their own countries. Take it up with them.
tarantella64 wrote:
Oh? I know some Dutch, French, and English Jews who'd like to have a word with you. There are some Jews in Kansas, and for that matter in my town, who'd also like a word.
Some places of course are more welcoming than others. I was thinking much more of affluent sky-rise cities like New York and London. Of course if you go to whistling dixie country then people in these areas have an issue with anyone of difference, not just Jews.
tarantella64 wrote:
I'm mainly curious at this point about how you got to be such a deep-dyed moron on the subject.
The fact you're resorting to ad hominem means i assume you concede the debate.