DentArthurDent wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Yes!
And the concept of "infinity" too. This concept exists only in the mind as a thought, yet, it is used extensively in mathematical and scientific "proofs".
which is exactly what you did when debating evolution and your out of context definition of "determinism" as used by a particular study
Not appropriate to discuss this here, so no comment.
DentArthurDent wrote:
Oh here we go again mixing fact from fiction! To the best of my knowledge there is no such thing as a scientific proof, mathematics yes. . What next LNH are you about to argue the falseness of mathematical proofs or maybe you will to hunt down a 'scientific' study and warp the meaning of a word to suit your purposes,
Perhaps you are right, however, I was calling scientific ideas like 'The Heisenberg Uncertainty principal' a "scientific proof"?
I found this physics website calling it a "scientific proof":
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questi ... ific-proof
Many science "proofs" incorporate probability theory - which brings in integration across the space -- integration is often the whole space -- so negative to positive infinity -- which is what is seen here ... (scroll down)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle